Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 10:01 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 10:01

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Status:1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Posts: 421
Own Kudos [?]: 2976 [101]
Given Kudos: 630
Location: United States (FL)
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 2: 610 Q44 V30
GMAT 3: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 4: 590 Q35 V35
GPA: 3.45
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4450
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [48]
Given Kudos: 130
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Status:1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Posts: 421
Own Kudos [?]: 2976 [7]
Given Kudos: 630
Location: United States (FL)
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 2: 610 Q44 V30
GMAT 3: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 4: 590 Q35 V35
GPA: 3.45
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Mar 2013
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Sharing my findings..

A. appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

B. appeared — a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally
- Green highlights are fine. Red one is incomplete(sentence fragment) and hence incorrect.

C. appeared — a red sash across her chest; a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally
- Again the one highlighted RED is problematic as it is a fragment.

D. appeared with a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, she rode in circles on her gray horse, and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally
- here appreared with X(correct), Y(correct), she robe(wrong).. It should either be as below -
appeared with X and Y, and she robe..
appeared with X, Y and robe...

E. appeared with a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally
- highlighted GREEN is fine. But "And" is missing before robe.

By POE, A seems best and hence the ANSWER. :)
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 680
Own Kudos [?]: 1763 [3]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
avohden wrote:
Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally.

A. appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

B. appeared — a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

C. appeared — a red sash across her chest; a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

D. appeared with a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, she rode in circles on her gray horse, and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

E. appeared with a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally


oe to follow


A. appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally correct answer

B. appeared — a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally. She rode and waving are not parallel

C. appeared — a red sash across her chest; a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally 'a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat' separated by ';' is not a complete sentence

D. appeared with a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, she rode in circles on her gray horse, and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally 'She rode in circles on her gray horse' must be separated by ';' and not by ','

E. appeared with a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally. 'Appeared' and 'Rode' are not connected
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 May 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 106 [0]
Given Kudos: 105
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.7
WE:Analyst (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
Divyadisha wrote:

D. appeared with a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, she rode in circles on her gray horse, and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally 'She rode in circles on her gray horse' must be separated by ';' and not by ','


Could you please elaborate on why a semi-colon should be used in this sentence? Thanks!
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
fantaisie wrote:
Divyadisha wrote:

D. appeared with a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, she rode in circles on her gray horse, and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally 'She rode in circles on her gray horse' must be separated by ';' and not by ','


Could you please elaborate on why a semi-colon should be used in this sentence? Thanks!


A semicolon is required to join two independent clauses. Here the two independent clauses are:

1. The rodeo queen appeared.
2. She rode.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2016
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
Hello mikemcgarry. Thank you for the explanations,I have the following doubt:

1. Could an independent clause have a pronoun with its antecedent in the other independent clause? In this quest, "Rodeo queen......of her cowboy hat; SHE rode in circles........personally" She refers to rodeo queen and is still functioning as an independent clause, how?

2. Also, sentences beginning with however, can they be independent clauses?

Eg, - The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up
to 0.0005 millimeters; however, the wavelength of infrared radiation—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye

Is the sentence beginning with however, the... eye an independent clause?

Thanks in advance

mikemcgarry wrote:
avohden wrote:
Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally.

A. appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

B. appeared — a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

C. appeared — a red sash across her chest; a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

D. appeared with a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, she rode in circles on her gray horse, and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

E. appeared with a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

I'm happy to help. :-) This is a hard question.

The phrases "a red sash across her chest" and "a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat" are absolute phrases. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/absolute-p ... -the-gmat/
These are separated by commas, do not take conjunctions, and cannot be in parallel to anything other than another absolute phrase.
(B) is incorrect, because it puts a conjunction between two absolute phrases
(C) is incorrect, because it separates absolute phrases with semicolons
(D) is a run-on sentence
(E) is also a run-on --- the two verbs in parallel, "appeared" and "rode" must be joined by a conjunction.

Choice (A) has no flaws and is the best answer. The semicolon divides her appearance from her action. The sentence has a very nice flow.

It's funny --- the only error I saw in (A) wasn't the subject of a split at all.
"....waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally."
It's not clear to me that the pronoun "them" has a clear antecedent. This is the type of mistake that the real GMAT often employs in incorrect answer choices ---- using a singular collective noun, here "crowd", and then a plural pronoun referring to its members. That's illegal. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-pronoun-traps/
A possible correct phrasing would be ....
" ...waving at the crowd as if she knew each person personally."

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4450
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
Expert Reply
jjindal wrote:
Hello mikemcgarry. Thank you for the explanations,I have the following doubt:

1. Could an independent clause have a pronoun with its antecedent in the other independent clause? In this quest, "Rodeo queen......of her cowboy hat; SHE rode in circles........personally" She refers to rodeo queen and is still functioning as an independent clause, how?

2. Also, sentences beginning with however, can they be independent clauses?

Eg, - The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up
to 0.0005 millimeters; however, the wavelength of infrared radiation—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye

Is the sentence beginning with however, the... eye an independent clause?

Thanks in advance

Dear jjindal,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

As to your first question, one of the very few flaws of the Sentence Correction question format is that it predisposes us to think in terms of single sentences only. Of course, well-constructed sentences are the building blocks of fine writing. Nevertheless, there are grammatical & logical features that tie separate sentences together, and the GMAT SC typically neglects such features. One feature is that, in a paragraph, a main subject needs be mentioned only once, and often it is mentioned as a pronoun in subsequent sentences, as long as no ambiguity is introduced.
Einstein was a remarkable scientist. He published three papers in 1905. In the first, he explained . . .
It would be redundant to repeat the name in sentence after sentence. When you consider how a paragraph is constructed, it becomes obvious that of course it's fine that, when a sentence has two independent clauses, we can use a pronoun in one to refer to a noun in the other.

As to your second question, the word "however" here is simply an adverb. The presence of an adverb has no bearing on whether a clause is independent or subordinate. For more on the word "however," see:
The Word “However” on the GMAT

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2016
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.85
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
mikemcgarry wrote:
avohden wrote:
Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally.

A. appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

B. appeared — a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

C. appeared — a red sash across her chest; a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

D. appeared with a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, she rode in circles on her gray horse, and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

E. appeared with a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

I'm happy to help. :-) This is a hard question.

The phrases "a red sash across her chest" and "a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat" are absolute phrases.
These are separated by commas, do not take conjunctions, and cannot be in parallel to anything other than another absolute phrase.
(B) is incorrect, because it puts a conjunction between two absolute phrases
(C) is incorrect, because it separates absolute phrases with semicolons
(D) is a run-on sentence
(E) is also a run-on --- the two verbs in parallel, "appeared" and "rode" must be joined by a conjunction.

Choice (A) has no flaws and is the best answer. The semicolon divides her appearance from her action. The sentence has a very nice flow.

It's funny --- the only error I saw in (A) wasn't the subject of a split at all.
"....waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally."
It's not clear to me that the pronoun "them" has a clear antecedent. This is the type of mistake that the real GMAT often employs in incorrect answer choices ---- using a singular collective noun, here "crowd", and then a plural pronoun referring to its members. That's illegal.
A possible correct phrasing would be ....
" ...waving at the crowd as if she knew each person personally."

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)



Hi Mike,
Thanks for this explanation. I read the article on absolute phrases and have a doubt in reference to this question.
As I understand, an absolute phrase can modify the preceding clause. But in this sentence, the phrase "a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat" seems to be modifying "a red sash across her chest". Presence of "and" between these phrases would make both these modifiers separaetly modify the preceding clause which looks logical to me. Can you explain how is my understanding flawed?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally.

A. appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

B. appeared — a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

C. appeared — a red sash across her chest; a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

D. appeared with a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, she rode in circles on her gray horse and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

E. appeared with a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

This is indeed a daunting question to especially those non-natives who may not have heard of 'asyndeton' before. I was under the impression that the two modifiers are co-ordinate adverbs (which do not require to be conjugated with a conjunction) describing how the queen appeared. Still, we may try other roads to reach our Rome.

Choice B is unparallel with a clause before 'and' a phrase after.
Choice C is un-stylistic since a semicolon is not used unless there is a distraction from the presence multiple commas in a sentence.
Choice D is a run - on with no conjunction between the two ICs
Choice E is unparallel with no conjunction between the two verbs
What remains is A.

Incidentally, --waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally-- is common to all the five choices. Why underline that phrase unduly?

Originally posted by daagh on 08 Jun 2017, 07:08.
Last edited by daagh on 12 Jun 2017, 04:42, edited 1 time in total.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4450
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
Expert Reply
anupama000 wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for this explanation. I read the article on absolute phrases and have a doubt in reference to this question.
As I understand, an absolute phrase can modify the preceding clause. But in this sentence, the phrase "a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat" seems to be modifying "a red sash across her chest". Presence of "and" between these phrases would make both these modifiers separately modify the preceding clause which looks logical to me. Can you explain how is my understanding flawed?

Dear anupama000,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

The Touch Rule applies only to noun modifiers. It does not apply to verb modifiers or anything else. It is a very important pattern in only a limited context, and it is 100% irrelevant after that context.

Also, let's be precise with wording. It's true, as you say, that "an absolute phrase can modify the preceding clause'--yes, that's one possibility. This is not the same as "an absolute phrase must modify the preceding clause"--this latter statement is not true at all.

Absolute phrase modify verbs or clauses--we could say either, depending on perspective. They are not noun modifiers, so they are not at all subject the constraints of the touch rule. The pronoun "her" refers specifically to the "the rodeo queen," but the absolute clauses overall describe how she made her appearance--they answer a "how?" question, because they are adverbial in nature.

Adverbial modifiers, verb modifiers, don't have rigid rules on their placement. They don't have to touch what they modify. It's perfectly fine to have two in a row modifying the same clause, and that's exactly what we have here.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2016
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.85
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
mikemcgarry wrote:
anupama000 wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for this explanation. I read the article on absolute phrases and have a doubt in reference to this question.
As I understand, an absolute phrase can modify the preceding clause. But in this sentence, the phrase "a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat" seems to be modifying "a red sash across her chest". Presence of "and" between these phrases would make both these modifiers separately modify the preceding clause which looks logical to me. Can you explain how is my understanding flawed?


I'm happy to respond. :-)

The Touch Rule applies only to noun modifiers. It does not apply to verb modifiers or anything else. It is a very important pattern in only a limited context, and it is 100% irrelevant after that context.

Also, let's be precise with wording. It's true, as you say, that "an absolute phrase can modify the preceding clause'--yes, that's one possibility. This is not the same as "an absolute phrase must modify the preceding clause"--this latter statement is not true at all.

Absolute phrase modify verbs or clauses--we could say either, depending on perspective. They are not noun modifiers, so they are not at all subject the constraints of the touch rule. The pronoun "her" refers specifically to the "the rodeo queen," but the absolute clauses overall describe how she made her appearance--they answer a "how?" question, because they are adverbial in nature.

Adverbial modifiers, verb modifiers, don't have rigid rules on their placement. They don't have to touch what they modify. It's perfectly fine to have two in a row modifying the same clause, and that's exactly what we have here.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Yes, it makes sense. Thanks for the explanation Mike.
I just wanted to confirm if, in the above sentence instead of "-" we have used the modifier after comma, the behaviour would still be same. For instance, the following sentence is correct as it is, right?
Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared, a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4450
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
anupama000 wrote:
Yes, it makes sense. Thanks for the explanation Mike.
I just wanted to confirm if, in the above sentence instead of "-" we have used the modifier after comma, the behaviour would still be same. For instance, the following sentence is correct as it is, right?
Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared, a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat.

Dear anupama000

I'm happy to respond. :-)

The short answer is: yes. The sentence is grammatically correct with either a comma or an em-dash in that position.

Grammatically, they are about the same, but rhetorically, they are very different. The version with the comma is flat and dry, almost like a laundry list. By contrast, the version with the em-dash, the OA (A), is electric! The em-dash creates a momentary sense of anticipation, making us wait a fraction of a second to hear about how the rodeo queen looked. There is something tantalizing in this small delay, and sentence plays this up with great dramatic effect. The em-dash version is as engaging and exciting as the comma version is dull.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2014
Posts: 86
Own Kudos [?]: 67 [0]
Given Kudos: 522
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
mikemcgarry wrote:
avohden wrote:
Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally.

A. appeared — a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

B. appeared — a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

C. appeared — a red sash across her chest; a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

D. appeared with a red sash across her chest, a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, she rode in circles on her gray horse, and was waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

E. appeared with a red sash across her chest and a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat, rode in circles on her gray horse, waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally

I'm happy to help. :-) This is a hard question.

The phrases "a red sash across her chest" and "a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat" are absolute phrases. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/absolute-p ... -the-gmat/
These are separated by commas, do not take conjunctions, and cannot be in parallel to anything other than another absolute phrase.
(B) is incorrect, because it puts a conjunction between two absolute phrases
(C) is incorrect, because it separates absolute phrases with semicolons
(D) is a run-on sentence
(E) is also a run-on --- the two verbs in parallel, "appeared" and "rode" must be joined by a conjunction.

Choice (A) has no flaws and is the best answer. The semicolon divides her appearance from her action. The sentence has a very nice flow.

It's funny --- the only error I saw in (A) wasn't the subject of a split at all.
"....waving at the crowd as if she knew each of them personally."
It's not clear to me that the pronoun "them" has a clear antecedent. This is the type of mistake that the real GMAT often employs in incorrect answer choices ---- using a singular collective noun, here "crowd", and then a plural pronoun referring to its members. That's illegal. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-pronoun-traps/
A possible correct phrasing would be ....
" ...waving at the crowd as if she knew each person personally."

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Hi mikemcgarry, daagh, AjiteshArun, GMATNinja,

Could any of you please confirm if we can generalize Mike's rationale behind eliminating B?

(B) is incorrect, because it puts a conjunction between two absolute phrases. Can we say - "Two Absolute Phrases can never take a Conjunction?" Seems like an Extreme Statement to me.

I did however spot the "them" issue but noticed that that was a common across all options.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5179
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [0]
Given Kudos: 629
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
Expert Reply
anud33p wrote:
Hi mikemcgarry, daagh, AjiteshArun, GMATNinja,

Could any of you please confirm if we can generalize Mike's rationale behind eliminating B?

(B) is incorrect, because it puts a conjunction between two absolute phrases. Can we say - "Two Absolute Phrases can never take a Conjunction?" Seems like an Extreme Statement to me.

I did however spot the "them" issue but noticed that that was a common across all options.
As far as I know, an and can be used to join two absolutes. However, an absolute should not be joined to the rest of the sentence with a conjunction.

1. Absolute + and + Absolute ← This should be fine.

2. Absolute, Absolute ← This is also fine.

3. Absolute + Conjunction + Clause. ← This is not correct.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 255
Own Kudos [?]: 234 [1]
Given Kudos: 359
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
AjiteshArun : Does GMAT test this concept? An absolute phrase is tested frequently, but two absolute phrases not connected by any conjunction is rare.
There are other glaring errors by which we can discard other options. But the problem is we may think that this is also a glaring error if we are not aware of this concept, selecting another option which may have some "soft error" to our perception as I did.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5179
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [1]
Given Kudos: 629
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
ArupRS wrote:
AjiteshArun : Does GMAT test this concept? An absolute phrase is tested frequently, but two absolute phrases not connected by any conjunction is rare.
There are other glaring errors by which we can discard other options. But the problem is we may think that this is also a glaring error if we are not aware of this concept, selecting another option which may have some "soft error" to our perception as I did.
Hi ArupRS,

I don't think that the GMAT is going to go out of its way to test something like this, but I think you might just find this official question interesting. :)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 May 2014
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 109
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
Hello,

Can someone explain what's wrong with option C? I eliminated all others and picked C. I remember reading that hyphen is normally used to present reason/results/how. and the individual elements seemed like elements in a list explaning how the rodeo appeared. the latter part seems fine too.

GMATNinja
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5179
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [0]
Given Kudos: 629
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
Expert Reply
krishsaisree wrote:
Hello,

Can someone explain what's wrong with option C? I eliminated all others and picked C. I remember reading that hyphen is normally used to present reason/results/how. and the individual elements seemed like elements in a list explaning how the rodeo appeared. the latter part seems fine too.

GMATNinja
It's those semicolons. Semicolons are not used to join absolute phrases (there is no list here).

... a red sash across her chest; a crown hugging the band of her cowboy hat; she rode in circles on her gray horse...

In X; Y; and Z, we'd need an and, and we'd need X, Y, and Z to be parallel.

Here is an official question in which the semicolon is used correctly as a "big comma".
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Midway through the parade, the rodeo queen from New Mexico appeared—a [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne