darknight wrote:
brianlange77 wrote:
What noun is "using novel techniques" modifying? Is there a noun its modifying? If it's an adverbial modifier... what is it referring to? There is no 'event of the treatment' in this sentence.
Why it cannot modify the verb "treated" ? Between the following two sentences, what is the underlying principle which makes one sentence correct and the other one wrong? Kindly elaborate.
Last night our air conditioner broke, causing great consternation.
The patient's rare disease was treated, using novel techniques.
Thanks!
The two sentences are different.
1. Last night our air conditioner broke, causing great consternation.
What/who caused great consternation? The breaking of our air-conditioner
"causing great consternation" modifies the entire preceding clause "Last night our air conditioner broke"
If you bring the modifier to the beginning of the sentence, it might be clearer: Causing great consternation, our air conditioner broke last night.
2. The patient's rare disease was treated, using novel techniques.
Who/what used novel techniques? No idea. The main clause is passive. The user is not mentioned.
Bring the modifier to the beginning: Using novel techniques, the patient's rare disease was treated. - Is this correct? Is the user there?
We know that we need to provide the do-er of the action here. For example: Using novel techniques, Dr. Sullivan treated the patient's rare disease.