Montgomery, a biologist who is also well read in : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 18:02
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Montgomery, a biologist who is also well read in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1628
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 1057 [0], given: 2

Montgomery, a biologist who is also well read in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2010, 04:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

54% (01:34) correct 46% (01:51) wrong based on 10 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Montgomery, a biologist who is also well read in archaeology, has recently written a book on the origin and purpose of ancient monumental architecture. This book has received much positive attention in the popular press but has been severely criticized by many professional archaeologists for being too extreme. Montgomery’s views do not deserve a negative appraisal, however, since those views are no more extreme than the views of some professional archaeologists.
The argument is most vulnerable to which one of following criticisms?
(A) It fails to establish that professional archaeologists’ views that are at least as extreme as Montgomery’s views do not deserve negative appraisal for that reason.
(B) It assumes without warrant that many professional archaeologists consider biologists unqualified to discuss ancient architecture.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that many professional archaeologists are unfamiliar with Montgomery’s views.
(D) It provides no independent evidence to show that the majority of professional archaeologists do not support Montgomery’s views.
(E) It attempts to support its position by calling into question the motives of anyone who supports an opposing position.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 330
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 707 [0], given: 28

Re: Montgomery [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2010, 07:42
noboru wrote:
Montgomery, a biologist who is also well read in archaeology, has recently written a book on the origin and purpose of ancient monumental architecture. This book has received much positive attention in the popular press but has been severely criticized by many professional archaeologists for being too extreme. Montgomery’s views do not deserve a negative appraisal, however, since those views are no more extreme than the views of some professional archaeologists.
The argument is most vulnerable to which one of following criticisms?
(A) It fails to establish that professional archaeologists’ views that are at least as extreme as Montgomery’s views do not deserve negative appraisal for that reason.
(B) It assumes without warrant that many professional archaeologists consider biologists unqualified to discuss ancient architecture.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that many professional archaeologists are unfamiliar with Montgomery’s views.
(D) It provides no independent evidence to show that the majority of professional archaeologists do not support Montgomery’s views.
(E) It attempts to support its position by calling into question the motives of anyone who supports an opposing position.


I think this is a mistake .... you pasted a CR question in SC :wink:
_________________

press kudos, if you like the explanation, appreciate the effort or encourage people to respond.

Download the Ultimate SC Flashcards

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 747 [0], given: 36

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Montgomery [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jun 2010, 21:40
IMO : A

I believe this is the key

those views are no more extreme than the views of some professional archaeologists.

by POE.

(A) It fails to establish that professional archaeologists’ views that are at least as extreme as Montgomery’s views do not deserve negative appraisal for that reason.
(B) It assumes without warrant that many professional archaeologists consider biologists unqualified to discuss ancient architecture. >> Non sense
(C) It overlooks the possibility that many professional archaeologists are unfamiliar with Montgomery’s views. >> Non sense
(D) It provides no independent evidence to show that the majority of professional archaeologists do not support Montgomery’s views. >> but has been severely criticized by many professional archaeologists. This rings that this choice is wrong.

(E) It attempts to support its position by calling into question the motives of anyone who supports an opposing position. >> I didn't that that being questioned. Motives ?? I really doubt if this can be questioned unless someone know the motives.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 May 2010
Posts: 56
Schools: IU, UT Dallas, Univ of Georgia, Univ of Arkansas, Miami University
WE 1: 5.5 Yrs IT
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 3

Re: Montgomery [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2010, 05:02
IMO A too.

Montgomery's book -> Criticized for being extreme by prof archeologists.
Arguments says -> Should not be criticized by prof archeologists since their views are as extreme too.

So, anything that states the equivalent of - "there is no information on whether the prof archeologists' views were criticized" undermines the conclusion of the argument.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 22
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Montgomery [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2010, 05:12
The argument states that there are professional archaeologists with similar views, but it does not say that these archaeologists are not criticised by "the many professional archaeologists" critisising Montgomery.

Therefore: A

Quote:
Montgomery, a biologist who is also well read in archaeology, has recently written a book on the origin and purpose of ancient monumental architecture. This book has received much positive attention in the popular press but has been severely criticized by many professional archaeologists for being too extreme. Montgomery’s views do not deserve a negative appraisal, however, since those views are no more extreme than the views of some professional archaeologists.
The argument is most vulnerable to which one of following criticisms?
(A) It fails to establish that professional archaeologists’ views that are at least as extreme as Montgomery’s views do not deserve negative appraisal for that reason.
(B) It assumes without warrant that many professional archaeologists consider biologists unqualified to discuss ancient architecture.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that many professional archaeologists are unfamiliar with Montgomery’s views.
(D) It provides no independent evidence to show that the majority of professional archaeologists do not support Montgomery’s views.
(E) It attempts to support its position by calling into question the motives of anyone who supports an opposing position.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2014
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 4

Re: Montgomery, a biologist who is also well read in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2016, 11:14
Some people say his work is extreme
But he doesn't deserve this, because what some people say are just as extreme.

Clearly the author thinks those some people have higher standing, or else he wouldn't defer to their authority.
But then what if these guys are idiots? If their view was never good, then using such a bad standard could in fact suggest that he does deserve to be perceived as extreme.
Re: Montgomery, a biologist who is also well read in   [#permalink] 13 Oct 2016, 11:14
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
19 Experts publish their posts in the topic When I read a novel set in a city I know well, I must see temuchin 11 20 May 2014, 23:37
Most authors who write novels also write short stories, and bschool83 12 30 Aug 2011, 21:23
2 George: A well-known educator claims that children who are rohitgoel15 4 09 Jul 2010, 21:41
When I read a novel set in a city I know well, I must see ghentu 3 18 Oct 2009, 18:54
George: A well-known educator claims that children who are vineetgupta 5 14 Mar 2007, 07:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Montgomery, a biologist who is also well read in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.