Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 02:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Most cable television companies currently require customers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

Most cable television companies currently require customers [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 04:56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscribe to packages of channels, but consumer groups have recently proposed legislation that would force the companies to offer a la carte pricing. Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels. However, the cable industry argues that under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers. For this reason, the industry claims that it is always cheaper for the consumer to purchase many bundled channels than to buy them individually.

Which of the following would be most important for the government to determine before deciding whether to require
cable television companies to offer a la carte pricing in order to reduce consumer costs?
a Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a
result of the a la carte pricing structure
b Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
c Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
d Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
e Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 319
Location: Hungary
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 05:06
I think, D is the correct answer.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 2

Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 05:54
In for A
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 652
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 6

Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 06:22
IMO A.

cunclusion based on "cheaper for the consumer" because "many channels". If A is true, la carte will still provide bundle of channels and thus will criticize cable industries' argument.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 99

Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 09:27
IMO C.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1435
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 1

Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 09:40
ritula wrote:
Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscribe to packages of channels, but consumer groups have recently proposed legislation that would force the companies to offer a la carte pricing. Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels. However, the cable industry argues that under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers. For this reason, the industry claims that it is always cheaper for the consumer to purchase many bundled channels than to buy them individually.

Which of the following would be most important for the government to determine before deciding whether to require
cable television companies to offer a la carte pricing in order to reduce consumer costs?
a Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a
result of the a la carte pricing structure
b Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
c Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
d Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
e Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes


Gov is looking to reduce consumer costs and not any thing else as whether C & S companies can buy or not. Such a requirement will only be helpful if vast majority use AL pricing. If it is just a small percentage, it does not help the consumer base and the cable companies and most importantly money is not being saved for customers. Hence C
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 204
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 19:40
A

main intension of this paragraph is

Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels.
Cable industry - under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers.


now one should ask about the number of such less popular channels. to see weather the pricing model as proposed by
consumer groups above will make sense.

if there is very less less popular channels, then pricing model described abve will not make sense.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 20:18
ritula wrote:
Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscribe to packages of channels, but consumer groups have recently proposed legislation that would force the companies to offer a la carte pricing. Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels. However, the cable industry argues that under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers. For this reason, the industry claims that it is always cheaper for the consumer to purchase many bundled channels than to buy them individually.

Which of the following would be most important for the government to determine before deciding whether to require cable television companies to offer a la carte pricing in order to reduce consumer costs?
a Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a
result of the a la carte pricing structure
b Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
c Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
d Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
e Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes


C too

1. The goverment cares WHETHER OR NOT to help reduce the customers cost. So No matter what the results are of the Cable companies, if it forces the companies to offer a la carte pricing. A and B out

2. The Govt. does not care from WHERE the companies can buy channels, then sell them. D out

3. The argument does not mention "new TV st-top boxes", E out

C is the best
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 22:05
OA is C.
OE is :
If consumers would not choose to order all of the channels they currently buy as part of a package subscription, then the cable television industries' claim that a la carte costs always would increase is faulty. If most consumers only watch and wish to pay for a few of their favorite channels, a la carte pricing could very well result in lower cable bills for those consumers. Consumers who want to purchase more channels could still choose the package subscriptions, so a la carte pricing would not harm them.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 2

Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2009, 22:54
ritula wrote:
OA is C.
OE is :
If consumers would not choose to order all of the channels they currently buy as part of a package subscription, then the cable television industries' claim that a la carte costs always would increase is faulty. If most consumers only watch and wish to pay for a few of their favorite channels, a la carte pricing could very well result in lower cable bills for those consumers. Consumers who want to purchase more channels could still choose the package subscriptions, so a la carte pricing would not harm them.


Exactly. This is the only relevant issue when deciding whether or not to approve this legislation.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 2

Re: CR:cable [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2009, 00:25
I understand where I went wrong.
I read the argument and when moved on to the option , I mistakenly believed that it is from Customer point of view. That means it is sure customers want the Al A Carte in the first place.

But indeed , I was wrong.
Re: CR:cable   [#permalink] 14 Feb 2009, 00:25
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Most cable television companies currently require customers hitman4683v1 9 22 Feb 2010, 09:18
1 Most cable television companies currently require customers gddunton 9 10 Dec 2009, 17:59
4 Most cable television companies currently require customers noboru 10 30 Jul 2009, 03:15
Most cable television companies currently require customers dancinggeometry 7 13 Sep 2008, 01:56
Most cable television companies currently require customers agold 9 13 May 2008, 21:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Most cable television companies currently require customers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.