Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 10 Jul 2014, 22:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Most cable television companies currently require customers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Most cable television companies currently require customers [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2009, 03:15
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

57% (01:51) correct 42% (02:24) wrong based on 7 sessions
Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscribe to packages of channels, but consumer groups have recently proposed legislation that would force the companies to offer a la carte pricing. Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels. However, the cable industry argues that under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers. For this reason, the industry claims that it is always cheaper for the consumer to purchase many bundled channels than to buy them individually.

Which of the following would be most important for the government to determine before deciding whether to require cable television companies to offer a la carte pricing in order to reduce consumer costs?
A Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
B Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
C Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
D Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
E Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Current Student
User avatar
Status: What's your raashee?
Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Posts: 1847
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: UNC (Kenan-Flagler) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 52

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: a la carte subscribers [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2009, 05:06
noboru wrote:
Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscribe to packages of channels, but consumer groups have recently proposed legislation that would force the companies to offer a la carte pricing. Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels. However, the cable industry argues that under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers. For this reason, the industry claims that it is always cheaper for the consumer to purchase many bundled channels than to buy them individually.

Which of the following would be most important for the government to determine before deciding whether to require cable television companies to offer a la carte pricing in order to reduce consumer costs?
A Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
B Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
C Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
D Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
E Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes


A-irrelevant since the customer's choosing.
B-out of scope - not one mention of revenue
C-MAYBE - if majority of customers buy those channels in the packages they wouldve have bought anyway it might be more expensive
D - not relevant
E - not relevant.

Seems only relevant one is C
_________________

If you like my answers please +1 kudos!

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: a la carte subscribers [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2009, 05:50
shaselai wrote:
noboru wrote:
Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscribe to packages of channels, but consumer groups have recently proposed legislation that would force the companies to offer a la carte pricing. Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels. However, the cable industry argues that under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers. For this reason, the industry claims that it is always cheaper for the consumer to purchase many bundled channels than to buy them individually.

Which of the following would be most important for the government to determine before deciding whether to require cable television companies to offer a la carte pricing in order to reduce consumer costs?
A Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
B Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
C Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
D Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
E Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes


A-irrelevant since the customer's choosing.
B-out of scope - not one mention of revenue
C-MAYBE - if majority of customers buy those channels in the packages they wouldve have bought anyway it might be more expensive
D - not relevant
E - not relevant.

Seems only relevant one is C


Why is E not relevant?

If new TV set top pox is required, that will economicaly impact the customer, right? Since the government wants in fact to reduce customer´s costs, E is relevant for the discussion...
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Current Student
User avatar
Status: What's your raashee?
Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Posts: 1847
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: UNC (Kenan-Flagler) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 52

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: a la carte subscribers [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2009, 06:02
noboru wrote:
shaselai wrote:
noboru wrote:
Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscribe to packages of channels, but consumer groups have recently proposed legislation that would force the companies to offer a la carte pricing. Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels. However, the cable industry argues that under the current package pricing, popular channels subsidize less-popular ones, providing more options for viewers. For this reason, the industry claims that it is always cheaper for the consumer to purchase many bundled channels than to buy them individually.

Which of the following would be most important for the government to determine before deciding whether to require cable television companies to offer a la carte pricing in order to reduce consumer costs?
A Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
B Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
C Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
D Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
E Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes


A-irrelevant since the customer's choosing.
B-out of scope - not one mention of revenue
C-MAYBE - if majority of customers buy those channels in the packages they wouldve have bought anyway it might be more expensive
D - not relevant
E - not relevant.

Seems only relevant one is C


Why is E not relevant?

If new TV set top pox is required, that will economicaly impact the customer, right? Since the government wants in fact to reduce customer´s costs, E is relevant for the discussion...

is E the correct answer? Yes they might need to buy new television sets but we dont know how much that sets them back and since it is most likely a one time fee i dont think it has a much bigger impact in the long run for the consumer. You could also argue B is relevant by saying lowering the revenue may cause companies to raise the price. But staying on the topic which is subscribing channels I think C is probably the right one... OA?
_________________

If you like my answers please +1 kudos!

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 852
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 106

GMAT Tests User
Re: a la carte subscribers [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2009, 06:34
A seems to go little out of scope

I will go with C.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: a la carte subscribers [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2009, 07:22
[/quote]
is E the correct answer? Yes they might need to buy new television sets but we dont know how much that sets them back and since it is most likely a one time fee i dont think it has a much bigger impact in the long run for the consumer. You could also argue B is relevant by saying lowering the revenue may cause companies to raise the price. But staying on the topic which is subscribing channels I think C is probably the right one... OA?[/quote]

OA is C
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Mar 2008
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [1] , given: 1

Re: a la carte subscribers [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2009, 07:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
IMO C.

Here is a strategy to attack this type of question. Since this is an evaluate argument type question, consider each answer choice and give a positive and negative response to it. Check whether the different response has just the opposite effect on the conclusion. The answer choice which will have the opposite effects on the conclusion for positive and negative response is the correct choice.
For example, let's consider each answer choice.

Here the industry concludes that bundled channels will be cheaper for consumer.

A) Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
positive response- YES . That means total no. of channel will decrease, but that does not provide any info about the cheapness of the bundle. so, effect on conclusion is nothing.
negative response - NO. That means total no. of channel will either increase or remain same, but again no info about cost. so irrelevant.

B) Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
Yes/ NO , in both cases no effect on the cost of the bundled channels

C) Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
positive response- Yes.now if the consumers reduce the number of channels and they are allowed to opt for only the desired channels then the bundled channels will not be cheaper.hence this weakens the conclusion.
negative response- NO. if the consumers increase the number of channels and are allowed to opt for their desired channels then the package will be cheaper for them. This strengthen the industry's claim.
--------hence C is the correct option.

D) Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
YES/No does not have any effect on the conclusion.
E) Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes
YES. But the cost of set-top box has nothing to do with the cost of bundled channel
No-does not effect the cost of the bundled channels.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 1

Re: a la carte subscribers [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2009, 07:21
Yep C.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: a la carte subscribers [#permalink] New post 19 Nov 2010, 10:46
Good job!

sudiptak wrote:
IMO C.

Here is a strategy to attack this type of question. Since this is an evaluate argument type question, consider each answer choice and give a positive and negative response to it. Check whether the different response has just the opposite effect on the conclusion. The answer choice which will have the opposite effects on the conclusion for positive and negative response is the correct choice.
For example, let's consider each answer choice.

Here the industry concludes that bundled channels will be cheaper for consumer.

A) Whether the total number of channels offered to consumers would decrease, along with programming diversity, as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
positive response- YES . That means total no. of channel will decrease, but that does not provide any info about the cheapness of the bundle. so, effect on conclusion is nothing.
negative response - NO. That means total no. of channel will either increase or remain same, but again no info about cost. so irrelevant.

B) Whether advertising revenue for the cable television companies would decrease as a result of the a la carte pricing structure
Yes/ NO , in both cases no effect on the cost of the bundled channels

C) Whether the vast majority of consumers would greatly reduce the number of channels purchased if given the option of purchasing them individually
positive response- Yes.now if the consumers reduce the number of channels and they are allowed to opt for only the desired channels then the bundled channels will not be cheaper.hence this weakens the conclusion.
negative response- NO. if the consumers increase the number of channels and are allowed to opt for their desired channels then the package will be cheaper for them. This strengthen the industry's claim.
--------hence C is the correct option.

D) Whether cable and satellite companies currently have the ability to buy channels individually from programmers and content providers
YES/No does not have any effect on the conclusion.
E) Whether a la carte subscribers would be required to have new television set-top boxes
YES. But the cost of set-top box has nothing to do with the cost of bundled channel
No-does not effect the cost of the bundled channels.

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 321
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 35

GMAT Tests User
Re: a la carte subscribers [#permalink] New post 19 Nov 2010, 12:32
C is the only one seems relevant ..because of this sentence in the question stem:

Subscribers would pay less, argue the consumer groups, because they could purchase only the desired channels This will cost to the company.
Re: a la carte subscribers   [#permalink] 19 Nov 2010, 12:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Most cable television companies currently require customers hitman4683v1 9 22 Feb 2010, 09:18
1 Most cable television companies currently require customers gddunton 9 10 Dec 2009, 17:59
Most cable television companies currently require customers ritula 10 13 Feb 2009, 04:56
Most cable television companies currently require customers dancinggeometry 7 13 Sep 2008, 01:56
Most cable television companies currently require customers agold 9 13 May 2008, 21:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Most cable television companies currently require customers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.