Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 03:37
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 200
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2007, 17:46
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (01:47) correct 23% (00:46) wrong based on 45 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.

(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2492
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 729 [0], given: 19

Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2007, 20:17
ColumbiaDream wrote:
I'm afraid i have two OAs. I came across this question in an old paper test. The OA in that is different from the discussion here on the forum. Don't know which one to go with?!?!


Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.
(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will


D. idiom "so x that y"
E would be correct if it were "so as x to be y".
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2007, 22:17
ColumbiaDream wrote:
I'm afraid i have two OAs. I came across this question in an old paper test. The OA in that is different from the discussion here on the forum. Don't know which one to go with?!?!


Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.
(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will


Will go for 'E'...

But is it not weird to compare 'nuclear power' with 'coal or oil'.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 518
Location: Indonesia
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2007, 03:36
E for me

Choice is between D and E

In D though the idiom is correct "So X that Y" tense is the issue... in my opinion use of "will" instead of "is"would have made sentence correct.

E- Correct idiom So x to (be) Y... and use of will is right on dot.

Good question

Amar
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1104
Location: London
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2007, 04:00
ColumbiaDream wrote:
I'm afraid i have two OAs. I came across this question in an old paper test. The OA in that is different from the discussion here on the forum. Don't know which one to go with?!?!


Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.
(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will


E.

...so (adjective) as to (verb)...
so that is fine but not a proper structure to be used here
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1146
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2007, 04:44
I vote for (D)

:)
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1104
Location: London
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2007, 04:54
ColumbiaDream wrote:
I'm afraid i have two OAs. I came across this question in an old paper test. The OA in that is different from the discussion here on the forum. Don't know which one to go with?!?!


Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.
(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will


ah. that's from OG. i remember it.

i think in E. the structure is correct. only that makes some mess. but yet dunno.
I had it in my Powerprep test. it was D.

does any one have any other inputs about D and E.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 200
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2007, 18:08
Thanks guys.
The two answers I had were C and D.
According to an old paper test from mba.com the answer is C but according to the forum and ( i guess OG?) it's D.

Guess I'll look for it in OG now..
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 06 May 2015
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 42

Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2016, 23:00
ColumbiaDream wrote:
I'm afraid i have two OAs. I came across this question in an old paper test. The OA in that is different from the discussion here on the forum. Don't know which one to go with?!?!


Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.
(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will


Please could someone explain why option C is incorrecce.

ColumbiaDream The source of this question is GMAT Disclosed Versions TestCode 52 (Section 7) OA is D.
Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2134
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 83

Kudos [?]: 568 [0], given: 311

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2016, 00:31
ColumbiaDream wrote:
Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.

(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will


So x that Y is correct idiomatic usage ; errors in other options highlighted...
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1962
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 305

Kudos [?]: 1272 [0], given: 20

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2016, 11:15
reynaldreni wrote:
ColumbiaDream wrote:
I'm afraid i have two OAs. I came across this question in an old paper test. The OA in that is different from the discussion here on the forum. Don't know which one to go with?!?!


Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintaining nuclear reactors are too high for nuclear power to likely prove cheaper than coal or oil in the long run.
(A) too high for nuclear power to likely
(B) high enough for nuclear power to be unlikely to
(C) high enough that it is unlikely nuclear power will
(D) so high that nuclear power is unlikely to
(E) so high as to be unlikely that nuclear power will


Please could someone explain why option C is incorrecce.

ColumbiaDream The source of this question is GMAT Disclosed Versions TestCode 52 (Section 7) OA is D.


Two problems with C:

1. "High enough that" is idiomatically wrong - correct usage is "so high that". (already pointed out by Abhishek009 above).
2. "That" is missing after "unlikely".
Re: Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2016, 11:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic As a result of surging economic indicators, most analysts upgraded t carcass 3 25 Feb 2016, 08:19
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic Most historians now agree that the downfall of the Nixon administratio NickHalden 5 19 Jul 2015, 11:45
2 Increases in the cost of energy gigi66653 2 06 Aug 2014, 07:47
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic As a result of surging economic indicators, most analysts gmatchase 5 18 Nov 2012, 12:06
A} If the buildings contractor does not agree to repair the rohansherry 4 29 Aug 2009, 00:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Most energy analysts now agree that the costs of building and maintain

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.