Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Oct 2014, 11:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Most geologists believe oil results from chemical

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Posts: 129
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 76 [1] , given: 2

Reviews Badge
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2012, 07:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:00) correct 41% (04:24) wrong based on 170 sessions
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical transformations of hydrocarbons derived from organisms buried under ancient seas. Suppose,instead, that oil actually results from bacterial action on other complex hydrocarbons that are trapped within the Earth. As is well known, the volume of these hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms. Therefore, our oil reserves would be greater than most geologists believe.

Which of the following, if true, gives the strongest support to the argument above about our oil reserves?

(A) Most geologists think optimistically about the Earth's reserves of oil.
(B) Most geologists have performed accurate chemical analyses on previously discovered oil reserves.
(C) Ancient seas are buried within the Earth at many places where fossils are abundant.
(D) The only bacteria yet found in oil reserves could have leaked down drill holes from surface contaminants.
(E) Chemical transformations reduce the volume of buried hydrocarbons derived from organisms by roughly the same proportion as bacterial action reduces the volume of other complex hydrocarbons.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post

Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 514
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 269

Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2012, 22:39
+1E

Premise 1 - Most geologists believe oil results from chemical transformations of hydrocarbons derived from organisms buried under ancient seas. Suppose instead, that oil actually results from bacterial action on other complex hydrocarbons that are trapped within the Earth.

Premise 2 - As is well known, the volume of these hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms

Conclusion - Therefore, our oil reserves would be greater than most geologists believe.

If we look at premise 2 , it states that the “volume of the hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms”. I think, if any option ascertains this or add something to the premise, it will be our answer.

Option E clearly states that that change in volume is same for both, (volume of the hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms), (oil actually results from bacterial action on other complex hydrocarbons that are trapped within the Earth), these imply that the oil reserves are high.

:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 464
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V0
GPA: 3.23
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 11

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2012, 00:09
(A) Most geologists think optimistically about the Earth's reserves of oil.
What they think has no bearing on the actual truth about oil reserve.

(B) Most geologists have performed accurate chemical analyses on previously discovered oil reserves.
doesn't put any support on why there are greater oil reserve than what most believe

(C) Ancient seas are buried within the Earth at many places where fossils are abundant.
we need something that explains why we should think we can extract more oil

(D) The only bacteria yet found in oil reserves could have leaked down drill holes from surface contaminants.
irrelevant

(E) Chemical transformations reduce the volume of buried hydrocarbons derived from organisms by roughly the same proportion as bacterial action reduces the volume of other complex hydrocarbons.

_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 818
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
Schools: Ross '17, Duke '16
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 41

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 43

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2012, 01:34
Firstly, I choose choice E. however, after a moment of stupid thinking. i think differently, and choose B. Can anyone help me to explore the confusion of choice B. Thank you.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 514
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 269

Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2012, 02:01
tuanquang269 wrote:
Firstly, I choose choice E. however, after a moment of stupid thinking. i think differently, and choose B. Can anyone help me to explore the confusion of choice B. Thank you.


It is given that VOLUME of these hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms. Let us say 100 m3 and 50m3

Option E states that the proportion with which they are converted are equal. (1 liter of oil is produced) from every 1m3 of buried hydrocarbons as well as from other complex hydrocarbons

This shows that 100m3 will give 100 liter of oil whereas 50 m3 will give 50 liter. Though this option does not relate the exact production of oil with their volume, I think it is open for debate. I still find it better than others.

Thoughts?

:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1227
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 694 [0], given: 116

Premium Member
Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2012, 02:26
E is right. We can check by negating E and seeing whether that would weaken the conclusion.
Chemical transformations reduce the volume of buried hydrocarbons derived from organisms in a much greater proportion than bacterial action reduces the volume of other complex hydrocarbons. - This would mean that even though the volume of the hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms, the oil reserves resulting from bacterial action on them might be much lesser.
eg: If 10000000000 Kgs of the hydrocarbons only gives 1 litre of oil this would hardly make any difference
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 514
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 269

Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2012, 02:31
MacFauz wrote:
E is right. We can check by negating E and seeing whether that would weaken the conclusion.
Chemical transformations reduce the volume of buried hydrocarbons derived from organisms in a much greater proportion than bacterial action reduces the volume of other complex hydrocarbons. - This would mean that even though the volume of the hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms, the oil reserves resulting from bacterial action on them might be much lesser.
eg: If 10000000000 Kgs of the hydrocarbons only gives 1 litre of oil this would hardly make any difference


Negation technique is used only in Assumptions type. Don't you think?

:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1227
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 694 [0], given: 116

Premium Member
Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2012, 03:36
getgyan wrote:
MacFauz wrote:
E is right. We can check by negating E and seeing whether that would weaken the conclusion.
Chemical transformations reduce the volume of buried hydrocarbons derived from organisms in a much greater proportion than bacterial action reduces the volume of other complex hydrocarbons. - This would mean that even though the volume of the hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms, the oil reserves resulting from bacterial action on them might be much lesser.
eg: If 10000000000 Kgs of the hydrocarbons only gives 1 litre of oil this would hardly make any difference


Negation technique is used only in Assumptions type. Don't you think?

:-D

True. However, you can see that what I did was not negation per se. The "opposite" maybe would be a better term to describe it. My logic is that a statement which strengthens a conclusion when "opposited"(for lack of a better word) should weaken the conclusion.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 299
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 32

Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2012, 22:41
kingb wrote:
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical transformations of hydrocarbons derived from organisms buried under ancient seas. Suppose,instead, that oil actually results from bacterial action on other complex hydrocarbons that are trapped within the Earth. As is well known, the volume of these hydrocarbons exceeds that of buried organisms. Therefore, our oil reserves would be greater than most geologists believe.

Which of the following, if true, gives the strongest support to the argument above about our oil reserves?

(A) Most geologists think optimistically about the Earth's reserves of oil.
(B) Most geologists have performed accurate chemical analyses on previously discovered oil reserves.
(C) Ancient seas are buried within the Earth at many places where fossils are abundant.
(D) The only bacteria yet found in oil reserves could have leaked down drill holes from surface contaminants.
(E) Chemical transformations reduce the volume of buried hydrocarbons derived from organisms by roughly the same proportion as bacterial action reduces the volume of other complex hydrocarbons.


King - could you please let us know the source of these problems please?
Thanks in anticipation...
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2008
Followers: 266

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2014, 01:10
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Most geologists believe oil results from chemical   [#permalink] 08 Jul 2014, 01:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Most geologists believe oil results from chemical sher676 9 20 Aug 2009, 15:00
1 Most geologists believe oil results from chemical vishy007 8 11 Jul 2008, 09:36
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical Skewed 9 20 Nov 2007, 20:30
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical mm007 10 26 Dec 2006, 11:32
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical sushom101 7 18 Oct 2005, 16:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Most geologists believe oil results from chemical

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.