Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 10:12 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 10:12

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Posts: 56
Own Kudos [?]: 1213 [60]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64895 [25]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Status:faciendo quod indiget fieri
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 109 [10]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 416 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.33
WE:Information Technology (Retail)
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
1
Kudos
conty911 wrote:
Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used to cool the plant, in wastelands or dried up rivers. Central water research institute, which monitors underground water quality for its consistency, report that uranium makes up for an ever increasing percentage of water pollutants in samples the institute collect. Hence, the efforts to decrease the amount of uranium in waste water that power plants dispose without treating are yielding no results.

Which of the following statements most seriously weakens the argument.



a.)The government has already spent millions of $$ to check contamination of ground water by uranium. -> doesnt matter what govt has already spent.
b.)The powerplants are now switching to better technologies which result in almost negligible uranium waste - I found this a good contender but then it says the efforts have reduced after what power plants dispose off, without treating.
c.)With the application of various governement initatives to check water pollution,the proportion of major water pollutants such as arsenic, fluorides which used to be reported earlier has been considerably reduced.- gives an alternate route to understand why the % of uranium has increased ( this is because all other pollutants have reduced )
d.)While the percentage of power produced by power plants has increased, the amount of uranium used is unchanged. - doesn't give us anything substantial
e.)Because uranium is radioactive in nature,most of the power plants are using certain technologies that can control and limit uranium's radioactivity. - out of scope literally !

I went for B initially but then on reading the question again I came down the correct choice C.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Status:Prevent and prepare. Not repent and repair!!
Posts: 146
Own Kudos [?]: 417 [0]
Given Kudos: 282
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.75
WE:Sales (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
I still think B is the ans. How can C weaken the arguement.?? Can anyone explain.
User avatar
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 416 [2]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.33
WE:Information Technology (Retail)
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
2
Kudos
rajathpanta wrote:
I still think B is the ans. How can C weaken the arguement.?? Can anyone explain.



Hey, we need not worry that power factories are now switching to better methods to reduce uranium waste.
The stem talks about those factories, which produce waste without treating and what measures do govt take to reduce the % of uranium among the pollutants?

Make sense?
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Affiliations: SAE
Posts: 380
Own Kudos [?]: 961 [2]
Given Kudos: 269
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE:Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
2
Kudos
+1 C

Premise - Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used to cool the plant, in wastelands or dried up rivers. Central water research institute, which monitors underground water quality for its consistency, report that uranium makes up for an ever increasing percentage of water pollutants in samples the institute collect

Conclusion - Hence, the efforts to decrease the amount of uranium in waste water that power plants dispose without treating are yielding no results.

Anything which weakens the conclusion is our answer i.e anything which proves that the efforts are yielding results is our answer

a.)The government has already spent millions of $$ to check contamination of ground water by uranium. (Irrelevant)
b.)The power plants are now switching to better technologies which result in almost negligible uranium waste. (Not related to governments effort)
c.)With the application of various government initiatives to check water pollution, the proportion of major water pollutants such as arsenic, fluorides which used to be reported earlier has been considerably reduced. (Percentage problem, this clearly shows that other contaminants has decreased because of governemnt initiatives and the uranium content remained the same, thus showing an increase in the overall uranium content. This is our answer)
d.)While the percentage of power produced by power plants has increased, the amount of uranium used is unchanged. (Irrelevant, nothing is given to relate the efficiency to population)
e.)Because uranium is radioactive in nature, most of the power plants are using certain technologies that can control and limit uranium's radioactivity. (Not related to governments effort)

:-D
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Nov 2014
Status:I am ready!
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 362
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
Amazing question.. Sometimes my head just shuts down when I do CRs ..I have no idea how to effectively answer every time. I guess one reason maybe because I dint spend enough time on them :|
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Answer C cannot be a correct option... Conclusion in detail is Efforts to reduce the amount of uranium in Waster Water generated from Power Plants is not yielding results... The conclusion does not talk about reducing the amount of Uranium in general, rather it is more concerned about the Waste Water -uranium content in detail.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64895 [0]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
Expert Reply
conty911 wrote:
Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used to cool the plant, in wastelands or dried up rivers. Central water research institute, which monitors underground water quality for its consistency, report that uranium makes up for an ever increasing percentage of water pollutants in samples the institute collect. Hence, the efforts to decrease the amount of uranium in waste water that power plants dispose without treating are yielding no results.

Which of the following statements most seriously weakens the argument.

a.)The government has already spent millions of $$ to check contamination of ground water by uranium.
b.)The powerplants are now switching to better technologies which result in almost negligible uranium waste.
c.)With the application of various governement initatives to check water pollution,the proportion of major water pollutants such as arsenic, fluorides which used to be reported earlier has been considerably reduced.
d.)While the percentage of power produced by power plants has increased, the amount of uranium used is unchanged.
e.)Because uranium is radioactive in nature,most of the power plants are using certain technologies that can control and limit uranium's radioactivity.


Responding to a pm:

Quote:
My Doubt - What if Uranium content in the water remains same and only others are going down e.g. Uranium is still 1 ltr and other pollutants have been dropped to 1 ltr then Uranium's concentration is still the same and proportion has increased , this could also lead to that industries are not doing anything to reduce concentration from 1 ltr to further below ?



Look at the argument:
"...report that uranium makes up for an ever increasing percentage of water pollutants in samples the institute collect."
Hence, the efforts to decrease the amount of uranium in waste water that power plants dispose without treating are yielding no results.

We are deducing the conclusion (underlined) from the given data. When we add option (C) to the mix, we cannot make the conclusion anymore. It is possible that the efforts to control Uranium are yielding results but the efforts to reduce other pollutants are also yielding results. Hence (C) certainly weakens our conclusion. Remember, our conclusion is still possible. Just that it is weaker now.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 170 [0]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Send PM
Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used to cool the plant, in wastelands or dried up rivers. Central water research institute, which monitors underground water quality for its consistency, report that uranium makes up for an ever increasing percentage of water pollutants in samples the institute collect. Hence, the efforts to decrease the amount of uranium in waste water that power plants dispose without treating are yielding no results.

Which of the following statements most seriously weakens the argument.

power plant => dispose water
uranium increase % of water polluyant
so the efforts to decrease the amount of uranium in waste water that power plants dispose without treating are yielding no results.

[color=#ff00ff]Prethinking:-
1> must be other reason for increase in U in water, may be some other industry that dispose water into the water
2> or if there is no effort, U would have been more. so atleast some effect of treatment.

C. With the application of various governement initatives to check water pollution,the proportion of major water pollutants such as arsenic, fluorides which used to be reported earlier has been considerably reduced.

So if A, F has decreased and that is even if U is decreased it's % has increased.
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [0]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
Although the source of this question is unclear, the question ins interesting.
The answer is C by using POE.
Also, the pattern in C is that the fact is misinterpreted.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
Got it wrong, but lovely question.

Posted from my mobile device
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 290 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
Narrowed down to B and C. But to me neither make much sense. I feel the options are of a very poor quality. When the argument specifically says that uranium is not being treated and the plants have failed in treating them, how can we put C as an answer saying that your argument is weak because they are treating other major pollutants.
But, damn they are still not treating Uranium.

Not really convincing....B and C are both so incorrect.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Posts: 374
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 226
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
Hello expert,
Throw some light on D? Thanks in advance.
The conclusion says the efforts to decrease the amount of uranium are not yielding, while C says other pollutants(arsenic/ fluorides), but not uranium. So what does it have to with the conclusion?
Also, D says plants produce more power with the same amount pollutant(uranium) emissions, so the efforts of cotrolling uranium are yielding.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2021
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]
Given Kudos: 51
Send PM
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
KarishmaB wrote:
rajathpanta wrote:
I still think B is the ans. How can C weaken the arguement.?? Can anyone explain.


Report says that uranium makes up for an ever increasing percentage of water pollutants (i.e. the % of uranium in the total amount of pollutants is increasing). Note here that it doesn't say that % of uranium in water samples is increasing.
e.g. if uranium made up 2% of the total pollutants before, it now makes up 3% of the total pollutants.
What is happening to the % of total pollutants in the water is not known.

Conclusion: Efforts to decrease the amount of uranium are not working.

We want to weaken the conclusion i.e. we want to show that the efforts could be working.

Option (C) says that the proportion of other major water pollutants is decreasing. This could explain the increase in the proportion of uranium in the pollutants.

Think of values to understand this:

Say, % of total pollutants in the water sample is 5% i.e. in 100 lts of water, there's 5 lts of pollutants.
The 5 lt is made up of uranium, arsenic etc. Say, uranium is 1 lt and the others are 4 lts i.e. uranium is 20% of the total pollutants.
Now what if the amount of other pollutants go down from 4lts to 1 lt due to govt's efforts and amount of uranium goes down from 1 lt to 0.5 lt. The proportion of uranium has gone up to 33% of the total pollutants.
Even though proportion of uranium has increased, the efforts are working since the amount of uranium pollutant went down. Hence we have weakened the conclusion.


Mam, how to reject B ...the ques is about uranium waste in water and C is discussing about other wastes in water
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Most of the power plants dispose of their waste water, used [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne