Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Aug 2016, 21:12
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 272
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 0

Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2005, 08:36
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information technology (IT)- -defined as any form of computer-based information system--focused on spectacular IT successes and reflected a general optimism concerning IT's potential as a resource for creating competitive advantage. But toward the end of the 1980's, some economists spoke of a "productivity paradox": despite huge IT investments, most notably in the service sectors, productivity stagnated. In the retail industry, for example, in which IT had been widely adopted during the 1980's, productivity (average output per hour) rose at an average annual rate of 1.1 percent between 1973 and 1989, compared with 2.4 percent in the preceding 25-year period. Proponents of IT argued that it takes both time and a critical mass of investment for IT to yield benefits, and some suggested that growth figures for the 1990's proved these benefits were finally being realized. They also argued that measures of productivity ignore what would have happened without investments in IT--productivity gains might have been even lower. There were even claims that IT had improved the performance of the service sector significantly, although macroeconomic measures of productivity did not reflect the improvement.
But some observers questioned why, if IT had conferred economic value, it did not produce direct competitive advantages for individual firms. Resource-based theory offers an answer, asserting that, in general, firms gain competitive advantages by accumulating resources that are economically valuable, relatively scarce, and not easily replicated. According to a recent study of retail firms, which confirmed that IT has become pervasive and relatively easy to acquire, IT by itself appeared to have conferred little advantage. In fact, though little evidence of any direct effect was found, the frequent negative correlations between IT and performance suggested that IT had probably weakened some firms' competitive positions. However, firms' human resources, in and of themselves, did explain improved performance, and some firms gained IT-related advantages by merging IT with complementary resources, particularly human resources. The findings support the notion, founded in resource-based theory, that competitive advantages do not arise from easily replicated resources, no matter how impressive or economically valuable they may be, but from complex, intangible resources.


The passage is primarily concerned with
A.describing a resource and indicating various methods used to study it
B.presenting a theory and offering an opposing point of view
C.providing an explanation for unexpected findings
D.demonstrating why a particular theory is unfounded
E.resolving a disagreement regarding the uses of a technology
[Reveal] Spoiler:
C


The passage suggests that proponents of resource-based theory would be likely to explain
IT's inability to produce direct competitive advantages for individual firms by pointing out that
A.IT is not a resource that is difficult to obtain
B.IT is not an economically valuable resource
C.IT is a complex, intangible resource
D.economic progress has resulted from IT only in the service sector
E.changes brought about by IT cannot be detected by macroeconomic measures
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A



The author of the passage discusses productivity in the retail industry in the first paragraph
primarily in order to
A.suggest a way in which IT can be used to create a competitive advantage
B.provide an illustration of the "productivity paradox"
C.emphasize the practical value of the introduction of IT
D.cite an industry in which productivity did not stagnate during the 1980's
E.counter the argument that IT could potentially create competitive advantage
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


According to the passage, most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of IT included
which of the following?
A.Recommendations regarding effective ways to use IT to gain competitive advantage
B.Explanations of the advantages and disadvantages of adopting IT
C.Information about ways in which IT combined with human resources could be used to
increase competitive advantage
D.A warning regarding the negative effect on competitive advantage that would occur if
IT were not adopted
E.A belief in the likelihood of increased competitive advantage for firms using IT
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E


Last edited by JarvisR on 02 Jul 2015, 01:40, edited 1 time in total.
Formatted
Economist GMAT Tutor Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2005, 23:02
1. The passage is primarily concerned with
C.providing an explanation for unexpected findings

2. The passage suggests that proponents of resource-based theory would be likely to explain IT's inability to produce direct competitive advantages for individual firms by pointing out that
A.IT is not a resource that is difficult to obtain

3. The author of the passage discusses productivity in the retail industry in the first paragraph primarily in order to
B.provide an illustration of the "productivity paradox"

4. According to the passage, most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of IT included which of the following?
E.A belief in the likelihood of increased competitive advantage for firms using IT
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 294
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2005, 02:00
My answers are same as above
C,A,B,E
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 790
Location: BULGARIA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2005, 04:10
Have some doubts about Q1-think it should be E)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 272
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 0

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2005, 04:58
Good Job guys.
Its C,A,B,E indeed
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2014
Posts: 58
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2014, 20:08
Hi,

I have a question in regards to the first question. How does this passage consist of unexpected??? findings. I understand that something new way of thinking the IT's effectiveness was found but where in the passage does it say 'unexpected'??? Paradox just means contradictory but not 'unexpected'

Please explain.

Thanks.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 247
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q50 V19
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 3: 690 Q50 V34
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 93

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2014, 07:15
Why option B in Q2 is wrong.

The author clearly states that "economically valuable, relatively scarce, and not easily replicate"
_________________

Middle of nowhere!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2014
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 15

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2014, 23:41
rohitmanglik wrote:
Why option B in Q2 is wrong.

The author clearly states that "economically valuable, relatively scarce, and not easily replicate"



HEY rohitmanglik,

option B says eacxtly opposite of what is stated.. please read bold red part.
And infer the green part. As in the question suggest means infer.

But some observers questioned why, if IT had conferred economic value, it did not produce direct competitive advantages for individual firms. Resource-based theory offers an answer, asserting that, in general, firms gain competitive advantages by accumulating resources that are economically valuable, relatively scarce, and not easily replicated. According to a recent study of retail firms, which confirmed that IT has become pervasive and relatively easy to acquire, IT by itself appeared to have conferred little advantage.
Chat Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 748
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 537

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2015, 07:13
Difficult passage. Answered all correctly.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2015
Posts: 23
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 490 Q47 V13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 9

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2016, 11:36
Good one:-
Time taken (~9 mnts) 1 incorrect, 3 correct.
B
A
B
E
_________________

Abhilash
Learn, Apply, Fail, Analyse, and Practice.

Consider +1 Kudos if you find my post helpful.

5 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2016
Posts: 33
Schools: AGSM '18
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [5] , given: 29

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2016, 20:21
5
This post received
KUDOS
Why is option E in question 1 wrong?

Somebody helps me, please!!!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2014
Posts: 74
Schools: IIMB
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 231

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2016, 09:01
good question , but no explanations of the answer choice in the comments given. Cant understand why 1C is correct since there are no unexpected finding , its a paradox that author is talking about but cant be convinced its unexpected. Also why 4A is incorrect ? . Please explain would really appreciate your help on this. Thanks in advance.



Regards
Megha
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2015
Posts: 31
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 9

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2016, 10:26
megha_2709 wrote:
good question , but no explanations of the answer choice in the comments given. Cant understand why 1C is correct since there are no unexpected finding , its a paradox that author is talking about but cant be convinced its unexpected. Also why 4A is incorrect ? . Please explain would really appreciate your help on this. Thanks in advance.



Regards
Megha

Unexpected finding is demonstrated with the help of percentage 1.1% B/w 1973 and 1989 vs previous 2.4% in the preceding 25 years period
Resolving is just way too distorting, ultimately author hasn't described things in resolving tone

In 4A : literature never recommended any path like couple of measures with the IT usage will lead to desired numbers

Sent from my Mi 4i using Tapatalk
_________________

PS : I do mind kudos :)

Top Contributor
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 524
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT 1: 0 Q47 V29
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 605

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2016, 23:25
Top Contributor
~10 mins. All correct.
Reading Para took(~4 mins) and
2nd question(~2 mins).
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards :)

Re: Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information   [#permalink] 06 Jun 2016, 23:25
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Influenced by Evangelical attitudes, art and literature happy1992 2 20 May 2016, 07:37
Most pre-1990 literature on businesses’ use of information guerrero25 1 25 Aug 2013, 22:58
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Most editors of literature consider it their main duty to mattce 5 24 Jun 2013, 16:07
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic The idea of the brain as an information processor a machine Vercules 13 28 Mar 2013, 04:04
1 Most computers are digital, meaning they display information BukrsGmat 7 09 Dec 2012, 23:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Most pre-1990 literature on businesses' use of information

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.