Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
First time posting here and I hope you could help me on this; I've been trying to decide whether I should take a Masters in finance versus an MBA. Yes, I realize the pros and cons of both have been argued ad nauseam but I have never seen what the application differences are. I mean, for some MBA's if you have a weak GMAT but strong GPA and work experience it can make up for it, or how a low GPA can be made up by a Pulitzer-worthy essay, etcetera. But how is it for an MSF? Particularly for LBS/LSE/oxbridge? Sorry if this has been discussed before, I've searched and found nothing on it.
Re: MSF and MBA application differences? [#permalink]
25 May 2010, 23:01
Can't speak for the schools you just mentioned, however, for MSF I think stats play a bigger role in admissions. For instance, I know from the MIT application that they don't even have a real essay. Just 100 word boxes to fill in describing "why a mfin" and "anything else you would like the admissions committee to know", etc. Hence, for that particular app, I'd assume things like essays and recommendations play a very small part in admissions. In general, from my experience, if you don't have good enough GMAT/GPA breakdown, you will struggle in MSF admissions. In MBA applications, a weak GMAT or GPA can be compensated for by spectacular essays and recommendations.