My comprehensive review of the MasterGMAT program : General GMAT Questions and Strategies
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases

It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 23:19
GMAT Club Tests


GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance


we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.


Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

My comprehensive review of the MasterGMAT program

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
3 KUDOS received
Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 150
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 172 [3] , given: 17

My comprehensive review of the MasterGMAT program [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2013, 14:32
This post received
MasterGMAT Comprehensive Review

Let me begin by saying that I started with a 480. I chose MasterGMAT because I heard it was one of the best GMAT programs out there and that it had the highest reviews.

The MasterGMAT “program” is a web application that guides you through theory, via a series of online lessons, and then it tests you on the theory with sample questions. It walks you through each question, with accompanying text, examples, additional theory etc. In addition, and perhaps one of its strongest points, is that it encourages smart test taking strategies such as ball parking, as opposed to algebraic expressions that could lead to errors.

The MasterGMAT system is extremely powerful. You WILL learn the theory, because of how thorough, and how well written the lessons are. It gives you a framework, and structured system by which to tackle the questions, I thought this was leaps and bounds more productive than the Manhattan GMAT system, where it seems to be: read a long, dense, boring chapter, and then try some questions. To me, it seemed too detached. With MasterGMAT, the learning, and the practicing is one and the same. It is seamless and in my opinion, more conducive to helping you truly learn and master the material.

What is the weakness?

The biggest weakness of MasterGMAT is that it is simply incomplete. I completed the system in it’s entirety, and when I switched to real GMAT problems, (from GMAT Prep, OG13, Diagnostic, Question Pack 1, etc), I was unprepared to tackle the hardest problems. I did however, feel prepared for most questions up to the 650-680 level. The MasterGMAT system simply did not have lessons, or theory for those hardest questions types, or were inadequate in preparation, simple as that.

Verbal, specifically Sentence Correction was also a major weakness. I felt that the theory provided in the sentence correction did not adequately prepare me for the hardest real GMAT SC questions. The examples provided by MasterGMAT were methodical and strictly grammatical in nature, with a limited set of structures to correct. For example, at any given question, the SC would be strictly if/whether in nature, annual/yearly redundancy, amount to/sum – where an understanding of yes/no was adequate to deduce the correct answer. I felt that when I experienced the real GMAT SC problems, that the example sentences were far more nuanced in nature, and dealt with the understanding of the intentions of the author, and more obscure rules and guidelines than were presented to me by the MasterGMAT system.

I have no strong opinions about the Critical Reasoning. The Reading Comprehension, however, was also a little kooky. The system has a database of about 10-15 different passages, and the entire course is based on those. So often, you would be tested on one passage, and then a few lessons later, be tested on that passage again with new questions, so the training here was fragmented. I’m not sure how they could fix this other than a gigantic database of endless passages, so I’m not sure if you can truly penalize them for this.

I thought the tutoring was helpful, the instructors were very knowledgable and had a very good mastery of the GMAT questions, and I never felt as if they did not know how to solve any problem I threw at them. Again the problem is they use the problems from their database of questions. I would recommend finding the hardest real GMAT questions and suggest covering those instead (once you are in 650 territory). They are extremely accommodating.
I thought the AWA was very helpful, they correct your essays, and mark them up with suggestions on how to improve, this was very helpful.

The simulation tests were extremely accurate. I was testing consistently in the 640-680 range using their sims, and I ended up scoring 660 on the real exam.

Overall recommendation:

The system is powerful, and will help you learn the material. The problem is that the material is incomplete and you will not be prepared to score in the highest score ranges (700+). The material covered will most likely prepare you to score as I have, in the 640-680 range, if you cover no other additional material or utilize other sources. With additional time expended on the most difficult problems, or if you are naturally adept to GMAT type evaluations, you would likely be able to score in the higher ranges.

If I were to take the GMAT again, and was assured by Isaac (I think he is the Director) that the program had expanded its lessons and coverage of concepts and the hardest question types, I would do it again. Though, as of now, I have confirmed with them, with Andrew or Isaac (can't remember), that the new Economist GMAT is just a restructuring of the original MasterGMAT course, and that no extra material has been added.

My final score after completing the entire MasterGMAT course: (3 months studying, over 200 hours)
Total 660
Q 42
V 39

My score Pre MasterGMAT
Total 480
Q 25
V 31

Hope this helps.
Manhattan GMAT Discount CodesOptimus Prep Discount CodesMagoosh Discount Codes
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 170
GMAT 1: 700 Q43 V42
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 29

Re: My comprehensive review of the MasterGMAT program [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2013, 10:07
Thank you for the review. They offer a 70-point guarantee, so it is surprising that their program is so lacking. Have you tried the MGMAT books? I have found those to be good.

If my post helped you, please consider giving me kudos.

Re: My comprehensive review of the MasterGMAT program   [#permalink] 06 Jan 2013, 10:07
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Reading Comprehension is my weakest subject gillyelephant 1 18 Nov 2016, 19:41
Experts publish their posts in the topic Personalise My Program bgbeidas 8 08 Jan 2016, 03:47
1 Master GMAT course review FuzzyBuzzard 1 15 Feb 2012, 05:41
3 Master GMAT Online Prep review ronanbale 7 13 Dec 2009, 08:01
3 My MasterGmat Online Prep Review HopefulOldie 4 19 Nov 2009, 11:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

My comprehensive review of the MasterGMAT program

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: WaterFlowsUp, HiLine


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.