Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Oct 2014, 23:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
3 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 287 [3] , given: 2

Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 10:24
3
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

57% (02:27) correct 43% (01:24) wrong based on 181 sessions
Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the detective’s dull companion. Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution. Thus, the author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
(A) Most mystery stories feature a brilliant detective who solves the mystery presented in the story.
(B) Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective’s dull companion in that story.
(C) Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery.
(D) The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective’s dull companion.
(E) The detective’s dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery’s correct solution.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 171
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 39

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 10:35
my ans = E
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 287 [1] , given: 2

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 15:05
1
This post received
KUDOS
manojgmat wrote:
my ans = E


we want your reasoning, not yout ans.

By the way, is not E
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 2

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 18:48
I think it's B.
In the premise:
"Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution"

This means the clues that the companion uses is the right one (because the detective also use this clue to solve), but the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution.
If we can find his mistakes (find how/where he wrongly infers), we can get the solution. This is what B says.

Hope this is the right answer.
Please post the OA. Thanks.
_________________

http://www.online-stopwatch.com/
http://gmatsentencecorrection.blogspot.com/

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 212
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V35
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 26

CAT Tests
Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 22:13
Agree it's B. Since the dull companion helps readers solve the mystery, we can conclude that readers do so by spotting the mistakes of the dull companion.
_________________

Consider giving Kudos if you like the post.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 4

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2009, 23:29
noboru wrote:
Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the detective’s dull companion. Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution. Thus, the author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
(A) Most mystery stories feature a brilliant detective who solves the mystery presented in the story.
(B) Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective’s dull companion in that story.
(C) Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery.
(D) The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective’s dull companion.
(E) The detective’s dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery’s correct solution.


I see that only A really supported by info in the passage.
Others are questionable for me.
I will go with A.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 60
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2009, 06:04
Why not C?

"gives readers a chance to solve the mystery" tells me that enough clues are given to the readers to solve the mystery.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [1] , given: 48

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2009, 06:23
1
This post received
KUDOS
Will choose B plz provide the OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2009
Posts: 230
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 13

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2009, 12:19
fall2009 wrote:
I think it's B.
In the premise:
"Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution"

This means the clues that the companion uses is the right one (because the detective also use this clue to solve), but the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution.
If we can find his mistakes (find how/where he wrongly infers), we can get the solution. This is what B says.

Hope this is the right answer.
Please post the OA. Thanks.


I agree with B and this explanation.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 332
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 5

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2009, 20:57
i would have gone for A.

Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the detective’s dull companion. Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution. Thus, the author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution.

The passage says the above so definetly i can conclude with A.
b) Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective’s dull companion in that story. I did not like that often solve. Too strong to take. The passge no where supports it.
c)Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery. Does not say anything about it.
d)(D) The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective’s dull companion. ( We are not sure about diversion).Out of scope
e)The detective’s dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery’s correct solution. To strong to say it.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 51
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2009, 07:13
C for me.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 59
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 6

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2009, 08:02
The answer should be A.

B -> goes to a complete extreme saying all mystery readers can solve the case using dull detective's reasoning fallacies.....
C -> This is also a close choice, but I eliminated it, because, from the passage we cant firmly get a conclusion that, the reader can solve it, the last line "gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution" does the damage
D -> not true at all, since the last line of the stimuli specifically puts it forth
E -> again a fallacy, not supported by the stimuli, since the stimuli says the trainee detective puts the pieces of puzzle wrongly, it doesnt say he creates new pieces of puzzle

Please correct my line of reasoning if I have been mistaken somewhere
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2009, 16:39
IMO A

OA?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2009, 14:55
Answer is B
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Schools: NY Stern; Columbia; Cornell; Waterloo; U of T
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 8

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2009, 16:52
1
This post received
KUDOS
Premise # 1: Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the detective’s dull companion.

Premise # 2: Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution.

Conclusion: The author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution.

(A) Wrong: Because, talks about "most mystery stories" and "detective". Nothing about the dull companion.

(B) Wrong: Becasue, talks about "mystery readers". Not the readers of the mystery stories.

(C) Wrong: Because, talks about "some mystery stories".

(D) Wrong: Beacuse, nothing about the authors' conclusion "why to include the companion" and "diverting the readers".

(E) Correct: Supports the conclusion of inclusion of the companion and diversion of the readers.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 300
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 9

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2009, 17:05
going with A

the question asks which one is supported by the passage, not the other way around...

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
(A) Most mystery stories feature a brilliant detective who solves the mystery presented in the story. -correct, it says "often mystery stories ....."
(B) Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective’s dull companion in that story. not this because didn't mention whether readers solve mystery by doing that.
(C) Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery. -not this because clues are given in article for detective to infer the solution, didnt mention readers.
(D) The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective’s dull companion. -didn't mention this
(E) The detective’s dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery’s correct solution. -didn't mention this.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 333
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 13

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2009, 17:13
noboru wrote:
Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the detective’s dull companion. Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution. Thus, the author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
(A) Most mystery stories feature a brilliant detective who solves the mystery presented in the story. - This is true anyways, but this does not support the argument.
(B) Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective’s dull companion in that story. - This is not indicated anywhere in the passage that authors can solve the mystery by spotting the errors of dull companion. So not correct.
(C) Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery. - This might be true for "some" of the mystery stories, but it does not support the information given in the passage.
(D) The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective’s dull companion. - Correct. The actions of detective "rarely" divert readers from actions of the dull companion. This is the motive of the mystery story. But the word "rarely" also indicates that sometimes readers might also solve the mystery, if not always.
(E) The detective’s dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery’s correct solution. - This is anyways mentioned in the passage above.


IMO D. OA?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 May 2009
Posts: 61
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 3

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2009, 17:51
Conclusion : The author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution.

(A) Most mystery stories feature a brilliant detective who solves the mystery presented in the story - The conclusion is not concerned about featuring of a detective who solves mystery
(B) Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective’s dull companion in that story - This is the best choice because it states how readers can solve the mystery.
(C) Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery - We are not talking about mystery stories giving clues to infer.
(D) The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective’s dull companion - We are not talking about actions.
(E) The detective’s dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery’s correct solution - Close choice but only covers one part of conclusion i.e. diversion from correct solution. It does not tell anything how to solve the mystery.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2009, 18:22
noboru wrote:
Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the detective’s dull companion. Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution. Thus, the author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
(A) Most mystery stories feature a brilliant detective who solves the mystery presented in the story.
(B) Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective’s dull companion in that story.
(C) Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery.
(D) The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective’s dull companion.
(E) The detective’s dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery’s correct solution.


(A) Sounds almost right, but I wouldn't consider this answer choice the most strongly supported by the stimulus
(B) Not supported by what's been presented in the stimulus
(C) Best option ---because of--- "Clues are presented in the story" + "the author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery"
(D) No mention of this anywhere in the stimulus. In such "most strongly supported" questions, we cannot bring in outside information. The answer must be based on the facts presented in the stimulus. Here, it talks only about diversion from the correct solution (not from the actions of the detective's dull companion).
(E) Close, however the clues per se are not misleading. The interpretation though (made by the dull companion) is.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 333
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 13

Re: Sherlock Holmes [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2009, 18:35
Looks like nobody liked D other than me. What is OA anyways?
Re: Sherlock Holmes   [#permalink] 07 Oct 2009, 18:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Authors writing detective stories frequently include a kingb 2 06 Nov 2012, 18:13
Authors writing detective stories frequently include a agdimple333 2 13 Jun 2011, 10:58
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic The broad appeal of detective stories lies in the repetition tingjojo 2 27 Apr 2011, 06:07
1 Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the bigtreezl 10 26 Oct 2008, 00:56
1 Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the bepositive 8 07 May 2008, 01:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2   3   4   5    Next  [ 84 posts ] 



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.