Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 10:30 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 10:30

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 175
Own Kudos [?]: 1041 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4379
Own Kudos [?]: 32859 [0]
Given Kudos: 4452
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 175
Own Kudos [?]: 1041 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
carcass wrote:
Marcab wrote:
If I say, "Carcass, can you burn your collections of music on an audio CD?"- whats wrong in it?
But if I say, "Carcass, can you burn you music on an audio CD?"- does it sounds right?


Ya mod I agree.

But for the argument at stake If I read the question clearly the meaning convey with this logic chain (at least for me): X can accumulate a vast collections of music transfering IT \(or\) THEM and bla bla bla.....at the top of my head I intend suddenly the music not the collections..........

I hope I do not make a colossal blunder :roll:

It implies you have a GMAT EAR.
You must be a native I guess and most probably you won't make the mistake.
THe logic provided by you is the same as that by Ron, what else can I say in your praise.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Jp27 wrote:
Marcab wrote:
What about the answer choice?
IMO a prepositional phrase can't contain the subject, hence
shouldn't the "collections" be the
subject rather than "music"?


I guess Audiophile is still the subject of the sentence right. ...
music is the object of transfer copy and alter.... correct me if u
feel otherwise ...

Posted from my mobile device


Yes IMO you are correct.
But my doubt still persists. How can a prepositional phrase be the subject of the clause?
A box of nails, which is kept upon the table, is black in color.
Here the subject is box, not nails.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Jp27 wrote:
Marcab wrote:
If I say, "Carcass, can you burn your collections of music on an audio CD?"- whats wrong in it?
But if I say, "Carcass, can you
burn you music on an audio CD?"- does it sounds right?


I guess its should be " can you please burn your music collection on an audio Cd. " and
I think it should be collection of music instead of collectionS of
music..... pls feel free to critique

Posted from my mobile device


Regarding your first sentence, I feel otherwise.
MGMAT says: "soldier from Boston" is better than "Boston soldier".

Regarding your second one, I also felt the same but all the answer choices had the same issue. So we have to move on.
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4379
Own Kudos [?]: 32859 [0]
Given Kudos: 4452
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Marcab wrote:
carcass wrote:
Marcab wrote:
If I say, "Carcass, can you burn your collections of music on an audio CD?"- whats wrong in it?
But if I say, "Carcass, can you burn you music on an audio CD?"- does it sounds right?


Ya mod I agree.

But for the argument at stake If I read the question clearly the meaning convey with this logic chain (at least for me): X can accumulate a vast collections of music transfering IT \(or\) THEM and bla bla bla.....at the top of my head I intend suddenly the music not the collections..........

I hope I do not make a colossal blunder :roll:

It implies you have a GMAT EAR.
You must be a native I guess and most probably you won't make the mistake.
THe logic provided by you is the same as that by Ron, what else can I say in your praise.



Thank you Sir :)

often I base my choice not on my simple ear (in that case what seems correct, the most of time is incorrect) but logic. Infact you said the exact term: GMAT EAR or what the sentence trying to comunicate, just in front of you.

I do not want to do advice (here there are people with a better understanding of the verbal part of the gmat than me) but is important to have an holistic approach to this exam. you have a toolbox, use it fully
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [1]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
This is the second one and it would be great to discuss the answer choice A.

Anyways the OA is
Attachments

official 2.png
official 2.png [ 41.87 KiB | Viewed 12492 times ]

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4379
Own Kudos [?]: 32859 [0]
Given Kudos: 4452
Send PM
NAIL THE SENTENCE CORRECTION SECTION The only motive behind [#permalink]
Psychiatrists ..........they become ......have no sense at all

Specifically in A: is the noun lying that signals something NOT the doctors

This question, in my opinion, is great because magnifies the fact that the antecedent is interactions: plural. But here the connection or pivotal point is Lying. The question is great as reasoning. Always: trying to simply the question to the core

We must have \(IT\) that refers to lying

C what are the kinds.......they signal.........no sense

D that is signaled by it.......passive, awkward has no sense

E must be correct
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Status:Done with formalities.. and back..
Posts: 525
Own Kudos [?]: 1187 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Marcab wrote:
This is the second one and it would be great to discuss the answer choice A.

Anyways the OA is

Sorry, but why would it be incorrect? A makes perfect sense. It's not lying or psychiatrist we are referring to, but social interactions.
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4379
Own Kudos [?]: 32859 [0]
Given Kudos: 4452
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Based on the meaning of the sentence, the doctors are trying to disentagle the dark side or negative side of lying or the possible negative effects of this one.

The point at end is not to evaluate social interactions but how lying affects the whole story:)
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Status:Done with formalities.. and back..
Posts: 525
Own Kudos [?]: 1187 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
carcass wrote:
Based on the meaning of the sentence, the doctors are trying to disentagle the dark side or negative side of lying or the possible negative effects of this one.

The point at end is not to evaluate social interactions but how lying affects the whole story:)


Or may be interpretation is wrong?
Can't social interactions become destructive? or can't they signal something?

Moreover if u notice meaning carefully Psychiatrists have already recognized some thing about lying.. and now are intersted in evaluating the extent/details of those results.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Vips0000 wrote:
Marcab wrote:
This is the second one and it would be great to discuss the answer choice A.

Anyways the OA is

Sorry, but why would it be incorrect? A makes perfect sense. It's not lying or psychiatrist we are referring to, but social interactions.


Thats what I thought and got it wrong.
Seriously how can "lying" be destructive?

..and that is the reason why I posted the question here.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
the official explanation was just pathetic. If one wishes for, I can post it ASAP.
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4379
Own Kudos [?]: 32859 [0]
Given Kudos: 4452
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Post OE Please Mod

So we can discuss it together :) I'm curious
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4379
Own Kudos [?]: 32859 [0]
Given Kudos: 4452
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Vips0000 wrote:
carcass wrote:
Based on the meaning of the sentence, the doctors are trying to disentagle the dark side or negative side of lying or the possible negative effects of this one.

The point at end is not to evaluate social interactions but how lying affects the whole story:)


Or may be interpretation is wrong?
Can't social interactions become destructive? or can't they signal something?

Moreover if u notice meaning carefully Psychiatrists have already recognized some thing about lying.. and now are intersted in evaluating the extent/details of those results.



I always ear your objections........let me see what we can carve or squizz from it ;)
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Status:Done with formalities.. and back..
Posts: 525
Own Kudos [?]: 1187 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Marcab wrote:
the official explanation was just pathetic. If one wishes for, I can post it ASAP.

Ha ha.. I would rather think that our approaches of thinking may be incorrect. GMAC is the ultimate authority. May be carcass can help to reason it through since he got it correct.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
@carcass.
Give me few hours. GMATPREP is on a different system.

Coming to the question, what I feel is that "they" in A may refer to doctors as well as interactions, in such a case both are sounding fine.
Whereas E modifies "lying" only.
what say?
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4379
Own Kudos [?]: 32859 [0]
Given Kudos: 4452
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Nothing ........I read the question here at work, at my own risk but who cares :D.........10000 times.

First of all my intuition leads to lying (meaning)

Secondly, \(they\) is a bit ambiguous referring to doctors or interactions.

Other things I do not see........someone calls Sir Ron Purewal :D

I agree with you Marcab: same conclusion I had
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Said (M)
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.73
Send PM
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
Vips0000 wrote:
Marcab wrote:
This is the second one and it would be great to discuss the answer choice A.

Anyways the OA is

Sorry, but why would it be incorrect? A makes perfect sense. It's not lying or psychiatrist we are referring to, but social interactions.


Hi Vips0000,

Do you mean that 'social interactions' are destructive and they can signal certain mental problems??
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Nail the Sentence Correction Section [#permalink]
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13957 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne