Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 17:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 707
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 37

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2012, 17:26
BN1989 wrote:
How would you know what prompted the Spanish government though? I don't see why it wouldnt be possible that the UN actually prompted the Spanish government.

When in doubt go with the intent of original sentence. The original sentence correctly conveys that the UN didn't prompt the Spanish Government ; UN's action prompted the Spanish government.

Crick
Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 174
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 24

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2012, 22:03
BN1989 wrote:
karun0109 wrote:
E. Modifier issue with A and C. B changes meaning. Left with D and E. D also changes the meaning and suggest that the united nations prompted the Spanish government when in fact the action of the United Nations to declare the Aqueduct to be a heritage of humanity is supposed to have prompted the Spanish government. Hence E.

How would you know what prompted the Spanish government though? I don't see why it wouldnt be possible that the UN actually prompted the Spanish government.

Interesting. I think you're right. It very well could be the case that the UN did both and I don't think the GMAT would have two clear, grammatically correct and concise option with different meanings. So looking back at D I think Shikhar pointed out that "declared to be" is incorrect usage. I don't know if it's incorrect but it sure is unnecessary when you could just say "declared" like in option E. So E would win out.
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 369
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 31

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2012, 02:52
E is the best one using correct modifiers....!!
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 195
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [1] , given: 6

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2012, 06:36
1
KUDOS
IMO E.....

prompting ... ing form of verb here means result of action of US
Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2011
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2012, 13:16
Hi,

i understand that E is clearly the best answer choice,
however, i dont understand why "had been deteriorating since ..." is in the right verb tense.
Why isn't present perfect used: "has been deteriorating since ..." (The action started in the past, but its effect is still relevant in the present.)

Is past perfect used because the sentence talks about 1985 and not the present?
Intern
Joined: 14 Aug 2011
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 17

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2012, 04:39
What is the difference between using to prompt and promting?
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1996
Followers: 2080

Kudos [?]: 7146 [1] , given: 267

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2012, 08:32
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi All,

Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity in 1985, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating.

It is VERY important to understand the intended meaning of the sentence to comprehend the use of certain modifiers and verb tenses in the sentences. Some usages have created confusion. So let’s get the meaning here. In 1985, some 2000 years after the construction of the Roman aqueduct of Segovia, the United Nations declared this monument a Heritage of Humanity.
Since the original sentence uses the word “prompting”, we know that the UN did not prompt the renovations. Moreover, it makes sense that the UN’s declaration prompted the Spanish government to renovate this monument. Before this declaration, the Spanish government paid no heed to this monument and that’s the reason why it had been deteriorating since its construction. It is only after the UN declared the monument a heritage that the Spanish government started the renovation and stopped its deterioration.

Now let’s evaluate the errors in the sentence.
1. Since the opening modifier says “Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction”, the subject of the following main clause should be the entity this modifier modifies. This modifier refers to “the Roman aqueduct of Segovia”. But the subject of the main clause is “the UN” and now the opening modifier is illogically modifying the UN. We have modifier error here.
2. Phrase “declared to be” is not idiomatic. The correct idiom is “declared X Y”. We have idiom error here.
PS: There is no issue with “had been deteriorating” because it is an action that started long back in the past. After the UN’s declaration in 1985, the Spanish Government started the renovation of the monument and this stopped its deterioration. So this action of deterioration has already been taken care of in the distant past.
@bugmenott: If we say the aqueduct "has been deteriorating", it will mean that the action of deterioration is still happening. This is not true because the renovation took care of the deterioration that had started happening since its construction more than 2000 years ago.

POE:

Choice A: Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity in 1985, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating. Incorrect for the reasons stated above.

Choice B: Since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier, the Roman aqueduct of Segovia had been deteriorating, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations after the United Nations declared the aqueduct to be a Heritage of Humanity in 1985. Incorrect.
• Firstly, coma + prompting is modifying the preceding clause, suggesting that the deterioration of the monument prompted the Spanish government to renovate the monument. This is not the intended meaning of the sentence.
• Secondly, it repeats the same idiom error as in Choice A.

Choice C: After being declared a Heritage of Humanity by the United Nations in 1985, the Spanish government began renovations on the Roman aqueduct of Segovia, which had been deteriorating since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier. Incorrect.
• The opening modifier says “After being declared a Heritage of the Humanity…”. This modifier modifies the Roman aqueduct of Segovia that should be the subject of the following main clause. But the subject of the clause is “the Spanish government”. Hence we have a modifier error here.

Choice D: In 1985, the United Nations declared the Roman Aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity and prompted the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier. Incorrect.
• This choice also repeats the idiom of Choice A.
• This choice also changes the intended meaning of the sentence by saying that the UN “promoted” the Spanish government to renovate the aqueduct. From the logical intended meaning of the sentence, we know that it’s the UN’s declaration and the not the UN that prompted the renovation.

Choice E: In 1985, the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia a Heritage of Humanity, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier. Correct. This answer choice rectifies all the errors of the original choice and conveys the intended meaning clearly.

1. Modifiers and the entities they modify must be placed in such a way so that the modifiers modify the entities they are meant to modify.
2. We must use the correct idiom to maintain clarity and conciseness in the sentence.
3. We must be wary of answer choices that change the logical intended meaning of the sentence.

The use of verb+ing modifiers has been explained in details in the Modifier Verb-ing concept file in the preview level 1 concepts. Just register at http://www.e-gmat.com and learn this concept concept for free.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 132
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 373 [0], given: 33

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2012, 17:45
Bull78 wrote:
Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity in 1985, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating.

Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity in 1985, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating. Incorrectly modifies The UN

Since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier, the Roman aqueduct of Segovia had been deteriorating, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations after the United Nations declared the aqueduct to be a Heritage of Humanity in 1985. This one changes the meaning and also sounds like an awkward construction.

After being declared a Heritage of Humanity by the United Nations in 1985, the Spanish government began renovations on the Roman aqueduct of Segovia, which had been deteriorating since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier. This incorrectly modifies Spanish Govt.

In 1985, the United Nations declared the Roman Aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity and prompted the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier.

In 1985, the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia a Heritage of Humanity, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier

D and E are contenders. To pick out the correct AO, one should know the intended meaning.
According to D, UN declared and prompted the renovation. Wrong.
E, UN only "declared" and this declaration lead to the renovation. Hence the correct construction is declared ...., prompting .....
_________________

Encourage me by pressing the KUDOS if you find my post to be helpful.

Help me win "The One Thing You Wish You Knew - GMAT Club Contest"
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-one-thing-you-wish-you-knew-gmat-club-contest-140358.html#p1130989

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2011
Posts: 222
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 18

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 00:05
Bull78 wrote:
Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity in 1985, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating.

Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity in 1985, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating.

Since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier, the Roman aqueduct of Segovia had been deteriorating, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations after the United Nations declared the aqueduct to be a Heritage of Humanity in 1985.

After being declared a Heritage of Humanity by the United Nations in 1985, the Spanish government began renovations on the Roman aqueduct of Segovia, which had been deteriorating since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier.

In 1985, the United Nations declared the Roman Aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity and prompted the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier.

In 1985, the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia a Heritage of Humanity, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct, which had been deteriorating since its initial construction nearly 2000 years earlier

i pick E. A is out because of pronoun error. in A "its" cant be logically modified UN. B has modifier error, in B "prompting" cant be logically modified aqueduct. i think the intended meaning is changed in C. in D, "Declared" and "prompted" are two independent fact but logically 'prompting" is a consequence of the verb "Declared" so D is out.
correct me if i am wrong
_________________

some people are successful, because they have been fortunate enough and some people earn success, because they have been determined.....

please press kudos if you like my post.... i am begging for kudos...lol

Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 62

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2012, 15:47
Came down to 'D' or 'E' and picked 'D' =(
I now understand why it is incorrect. I figured out what Karun0109 was saying about 'D' changing the meaning of the sentence. Thanks guys
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10531
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2014, 04:26
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

Re: Roman aqueduct of Segovia [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2014, 04:27
DexDee wrote:
^ Another nagging difference between the sentences E and D: D says "the United Nations declared the Roman Aqueduct of Segovia to be a Heritage of Humanity and prompted the Spanish government", while E says "the United Nations declared the Roman aqueduct of Segovia a Heritage of Humanity, prompting the Spanish government to begin renovations on the aqueduct"

Is there a change in meaning here? As in the case of D, the UN has directly prompted the Spanish government to begin renovations. But in E, the act of declaring the Roman aqueduct a heritage prompted the Spanish government to take action. Does this subtle change speak against D? Or am I reading too much here? Please advice.

You are amazing .. You are reading just correct!!!
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2011
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 13

Re: Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2014, 20:46
mikemcgarry

Hi, I need to understand the use of possessive pronoun in this particular question. So far I know, for a possessive pronoun to be correct in a sentence, it has to have a possessive noun antecedent. In this question, each answer choice has 'its' but there is no possessive noun antecedent. Please help me correct the flaw in my understanding. Thank you.
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2014
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2015, 09:27
wo Wo Wo !!! 1min 17 secs for E. Any possiblities to get thie quicker ?
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10531
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2016, 00:13
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Nearly 2000 years after its initial construction, the United   [#permalink] 23 Jul 2016, 00:13

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 35 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 For almost a hundred years after having its beginning in 5 16 Mar 2012, 19:40
3 For almost a hundred years after having its beginning in 5 01 Dec 2010, 16:16
16 For almost a hundred years after having its beginning in 11 11 Aug 2009, 11:08
For almost a hundred years after having its beginning in 5 23 Apr 2008, 04:57
For almost a hundred years after having its beginning in 8 05 Jul 2007, 18:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by