Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they : GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 09 Dec 2016, 21:13
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Please see the question with the passage.

  • 0% [0]
  • 20% [1]
  • 60% [3]
  • 20% [1]
  • 0% [0]
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1995
Followers: 2055

Kudos [?]: 6993 [0], given: 262

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2013, 10:49
Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an invertebrate animal embryo into two parts at an early stage of its life, it would survive and develop as two normal embryos. This led them to believe that the cells in the early embryo are undetermined in the sense that each cell has the potential to develop in a variety of different ways. Later biologists found that the situation was not so simple. It matters in which plane the embryo is cut. If it is cut in a plane different from the one used by the early investigators, it will not form two whole embryos.

A debate arose over what exactly was happening. Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what are the "morphogenetic determinants" that tell a cell what to become? But the debate could not be resolved because no one was able to ask the crucial questions in a form in which they could be pursued productively. Recent discoveries in molecular biology, however, have opened up prospects for a resolution of the debate. Now investigators think they know at least some of the molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in early development. They have been able to show that, in a sense, cell determination begins even before an egg is fertilized.

Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that function as morphogenetic determinants. They are located in the cytoplasm of the egg cell, i.e., in that part of the cell's protoplasm that lies outside of the nucleus. In the unfertilized egg, the substances are inactive and are not distributed homogeneously. When the egg is fertilized, the substances become active and, presumably, govern the behavior of the genes they interact with. Since the substances are unevenly distributed in the egg, when the fertilized egg divides, the resulting cells are different from the start and so can be qualitatively different in their own gene activity.

The substances that Gross studied are maternal messenger RNA's products of certain of the maternal genes. He and other biologists studying a wide variety of organisms have found that these particular RNA's direct, in large part, the synthesis of histones, a class of proteins that bind to DNA. Once synthesized, the histones move into the cell nucleus, where sections of DNA wrap around them to form a structure that resembles beads, or knots, on a string. The beads are DNA segments wrapped around the histones; the string is the intervening DNA. And it is the structure of these beaded DNA strings that guides the fate of the cells in which they are located.

According to the passage, the morphogenetic determinants present in the unfertilized egg cell are which of the following?

A. Proteins bound to the nucleus
B. Histones
C. Maternal messenger RNA's
D. Cytoplasm
E. Nonbeaded intervening DNA

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA: C

_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com


Last edited by egmat on 09 Apr 2013, 12:06, edited 1 time in total.
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Posts: 44
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 97 [1] , given: 3

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2013, 21:09
1
This post received
KUDOS
Option C is correct answer which can be directly inferred from the following lines:
A debate arose over what exactly was happening. Which embryo cells are determined, just when do they become irreversibly committed to their fates, and what are the "morphogenetic determinants" that tell a cell what to become?
.........
Now investigators think they know at least some of the molecules that act as morphogenetic determinants in early development.
..............
Studying sea urchins, biologist Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that function as morphogenetic determinants.
..................................
The substances that Gross studied are maternal messenger RNA's products of certain of the maternal genes.

Thanks
ssbisht
_________________

The Kudo please :)

Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2021
Followers: 162

Kudos [?]: 1670 [0], given: 376

Re: New official GMAT passage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2013, 13:05
Paul Gross found that an unfertilized egg contains substances that function as morphogenetic determinants.
.
.
.
The substances that Gross studied are maternal messenger RNA's products of certain of the maternal genes
_________________

~fluke

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 58
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 9

Re: New official GMAT passage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2013, 21:49
option C is the correct answer.

wats OA
_________________

giving kudos is the best thing you can do for me..

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Looking to improve
Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Posts: 177
GMAT 1: 530 Q43 V20
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 65

Re: New official GMAT passage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2013, 23:00
I would go with C. Here are the reasons

A. Proteins bound to the nucleus - Proteins bound to DNA not nucleus
B. Histones - Synthesis of Histones and not just Histones
C. Maternal messenger RNA's - Correct Referred in the beginning of last 2 paragraphs
D. Cytoplasm - describes the location
E. Nonbeaded intervening DNA - Not Nonbeaded but beaded or knots on strings
_________________

KUDOS is a way to say Thank You

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2012
Posts: 116
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 57

Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2013, 08:40
IMO C

The third para talks about the "substances" - morphogenetic determinants
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10444
Followers: 886

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2016, 03:42
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they   [#permalink] 13 Jul 2016, 03:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separated an inver Bunuel 2 10 Oct 2014, 07:38
Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they carcass 1 28 Mar 2013, 09:40
1 Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they carcass 4 01 Feb 2013, 03:27
37 Experts publish their posts in the topic Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they separate amitjash 28 22 Jun 2010, 05:34
1 Post your answer with explanation! Nearly a century ago, lexis 10 04 Aug 2008, 10:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Nearly a century ago, biologists found that if they

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.