Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 05:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Need Feedback. Kindly Rate my AWA.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2013
Posts: 6
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT Date: 10-03-2013
GPA: 3.6
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 20

Need Feedback. Kindly Rate my AWA. [#permalink] New post 21 Nov 2013, 02:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
The following appeared in an article in a consumer-electronics magazine:

"Company X's latest model of digital camera to be released next month, the TR12, is being promoted as the most portable, user-friendly digital camera available, and also an excellent bargain. It can be expected to live up to these claims, because Company X's previous model, the TR11, was universally lauded as setting the standard in these areas last year."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.


AWA :


The argument claims that company x's latest model of digital camera, the TR12, which is being promoted as the most portable, user-friendly digital camera available, can be expected to live up to the company's claims as company's previous model, the TR11, was universally lauded for setting the standard in these areas last year.
This is classic past - future fallacy. If something has happened in past, it will also be replicated in future. Due to this fallacy in reasoning, Argument is rather weak, unconvincing and several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes company's claims regarding it model TR12 being superior in portability, user-friendliness. This is a stretch. As argument fails to provide any details regarding Camera specification, its performance and about it standing compared to rival products. Additionally, it did not give any details regarding the parameter to judge the various criteria for which TR12 is being credited. For example, When Auto-world, leading sports car magazine, give comments about any model of car, it gives details about the test performed and the parameters on which the car was compared with its rival companies. Thus, Without this kind of additional details it is difficult to accept details given in argument. The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly give examples and details about the specifications compared and bench marking method used to compare it with other competing products.

Second, the biggest flaw in the reasoning of the argument is regarding it assumption about past success resulting in future success. Argument claims that as Company X's previous model, the TR11, was universally lauded as setting the standard last year, company's new model, the TR12, will also do the same. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim. Moreover, argument did not provided any additional facts regarding the market condition and other technical aspects affecting th performance of the new model. The argument would have been better if author had provided additional references to support his claims.

In summary, the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts to support his claims. In order to asses the merits of a certain claim, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing facts and parameters.
_________________

Hit +1 ! If you find my post useful :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

Re: Need Feedback. Kindly Rate my AWA. [#permalink] New post 21 Nov 2013, 06:30
To tell you the truth, I thought this post to be boring. It occurs I had a wrong thought..) Thanks for meaning!
Re: Need Feedback. Kindly Rate my AWA.   [#permalink] 21 Nov 2013, 06:30
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Kindly rate my AWA deya 1 08 May 2014, 19:51
Kindly Rate my AWA mayank760 0 20 Apr 2014, 10:16
Feedback/evaluation/rating of my AWA jabronyo 0 05 Oct 2013, 08:05
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Kindly rate my second attempt at AWA. KanupriyaS 3 28 Sep 2013, 07:32
Experts publish their posts in the topic Kindly rate my awa ramannanda9 2 31 Jul 2013, 09:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Need Feedback. Kindly Rate my AWA.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.