Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 04:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Need help to understand "to be" parallelism

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 150
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 37

GMAT ToolKit User
Need help to understand "to be" parallelism [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2012, 00:57
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Hi All,

I am struggling to understand the "to be" parallelism. In Manhattan SC guide supposedly the below sentence signals parallelism, however i fail to understand how?
ex. "The flower bouquet WAS the husband's loving gift to his wife"
So usage of WAS means parallel?

Similarly another example given is "Because of his intolerant attitude, that politician always SEEMS TO BE attaching the poor". Here too i don't understand the parallelism. This looks like a sentence than comparison.

Can anybody please help!!!!
_________________

Please give Kudos if you like the post

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2142
Followers: 539

Kudos [?]: 2278 [0], given: 31

Re: Need help to understand "to be" parallelism [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2012, 10:25
Expert's post
summer101 wrote:
Hi All,
I am struggling to understand the "to be" parallelism. In Manhattan SC guide supposedly the below sentence signals parallelism, however i fail to understand how?
ex. "The flower bouquet WAS the husband's loving gift to his wife"
So usage of WAS means parallel?

Similarly another example given is "Because of his intolerant attitude, that politician always SEEMS TO BE attacking the poor". Here too I don't understand the parallelism. This looks like a sentence than comparison.

Can anybody please help!!!!

I'm happy to help. :-)
The word "parallelism" is a giant and somewhat abstract category of grammatical constructions --- it includes any time when two words in different parts of the sentence need to be in the same grammatical form.

Ordinarily, we think of parallel elements as joined by conjunctions ---- "A and B", "X or Y", "not only P, but also Q" --- of course, all of those are perfectly fine examples of parallelism, and most parallelism on GMAT SC will be of this form.

What the MGMAT books astutely point out is that the verb "to be" and other linking verbs also create a potential parallel structure. When I say: "X is Y", or "X seems Y", or "X has remained Y", I am essentially equating X and Y. If everything is a ordinary noun or ordinary adjective, it's not so much of an issue, but when you stir verb forms (infinitive, gerunds) into the mix, then you need to be alert to issues of parallelism. For example:

To welcome each new day wholeheartedly is embracing life fully. WRONG [infinitive] & [gerund]

Welcoming each new day wholeheartedly is to embrace life fully. WRONG [gerund] & [infinitive]

To welcome each new day wholeheartedly is to embrace life fully. RIGHT --- both infinitives

Because of this, it seems the GMAT SC would frown on a sentence such as ......
Noticing what is unique in each moment is the way of Zen.
.... because we are equating a verb form, a gerund ("noticing"), with a noun ("way"). It seems they would prefer something along the lines of ....
Attention to what is unique in each moment is the way of Zen.
There, both parts are ordinary nouns, so the demands of parallelism are satisfied.

Does this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 150
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 37

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Need help to understand "to be" parallelism [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2012, 03:39
Thanks Magoosh,

Your sentence "To welcome each new day wholeheartedly is to embrace life fully" made sense as you are comparing using two infinitives.
however the 2nd sentence "Attention to what is unique in each moment is the way of Zen. " makes it difficult. What are we comparing here (parallel) ?
_________________

Please give Kudos if you like the post

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2142
Followers: 539

Kudos [?]: 2278 [0], given: 31

Re: Need help to understand "to be" parallelism [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2012, 09:29
Expert's post
summer101 wrote:
Thanks Magoosh,
Your sentence "To welcome each new day wholeheartedly is to embrace life fully" made sense as you are comparing using two infinitives. However the 2nd sentence "Attention to what is unique in each moment is the way of Zen. " makes it difficult. What are we comparing here (parallel)?

Dear Summer101,
First of all, please call me by my personal name: Mike. I work for Magoosh, but I do not fully embody Magoosh in my own person. :-P

One technique that's very helpful for dissecting a complex sentence is something you might call "bracketing" --- for any part of the sentence that is playing a particular modifying role, set that off in brackets or parentheses. For example, in the sentence ....

Attention to what is unique in each moment is the way of Zen

.... there's a long prepositional phrase, "to what is unique in each moment" --- technically, that's a prepositional phrase whose object is a substantive clause (i.e. a noun clause) --- for more on those, see this blog:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/substantiv ... -the-gmat/
The point is --- that entire distended prepositional phrase is an adjectival phrase modifying "attention", telling us what kind of "attention" --- so let's bracket it. (For more on adjectival phrases, see: http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... d-clauses/) We'll also bracket the little prepositional phrase "of Zen."

Attention (to what is unique in each moment) is the way (of Zen)

Now, drop the bracketed phrases ....

Attention .... is the way ...

First of all, this now sounds like something a Zen Master would say. More to the point, it makes the grammar very clear --- we are equating two nouns, "attention" and "way", so those two words are in parallel.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Re: Need help to understand "to be" parallelism   [#permalink] 11 Oct 2012, 09:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic How it is better to understand the argument - need help! NikolayGlu 4 18 Jun 2014, 00:37
Smeal - Need help in understanding the school. mbj9019 0 30 Nov 2013, 05:32
1 Need help in understanding this parallel construction!! summer101 3 03 Oct 2013, 07:38
Need Help on understanding the topic sridhar 1 01 Aug 2010, 01:05
need help understanding question about functions hyejiny84 2 23 Jun 2010, 20:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Need help to understand "to be" parallelism

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.