Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jul 2014, 01:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Net Neutrality ~ weaken

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 21
GMAT Date: 09-12-2013
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [3] , given: 35

GMAT ToolKit User
Net Neutrality ~ weaken [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2013, 12:56
3
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

74% (03:05) correct 26% (02:30) wrong based on 50 sessions
Net Neutrality stipulates that Internet service providers (ISP) cannot partition their bandwidth such that different types of Internet communications have different maximum bandwidth capacities. For example, an ISP cannot relegate high bandwidth voice-over-IP (VoIP) traffic to a separate tunnel in an attempt to ensure that users of low-bandwidth functions such as plain-text email are not slowed down by the high-bandwidth users. Some individuals support implementing Net Neutrality on the principle that one group (i.e., users of high-bandwidth services) should not be effectively penalized for the actions of another group (i.e., users of slow-bandwidth services, who have a special traffic lane carved out for them, thereby slowing high-bandwidth users).

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument of the supporters of Net Neutrality mentioned above?
A) The jobs of many high-bandwidth users require these individuals to use high-bandwidth services.
B) Placing no restrictions on the bandwidth of individuals who use high-bandwidth services would force ISPs to purchase massive amounts of expensive additional bandwidth, disproportionately increasing the price of access for low-bandwidth users.
C) A strong and well respected lobbying firm recently revealed it has been hired by large telecommunications firms to oppose Net Neutrality on the grounds that it infringes upon a private company's ability to do business.
D) One country that mandated Net Neutrality saw a decrease in satisfaction of Internet users.
E) A recent court ruling upheld the principle that technology companies cannot discriminate in whom they serve or how they serve users.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If KUDOS then gmatclub Test series.
YEAH!!

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 21
GMAT Date: 09-12-2013
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 35

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Net Neutrality ~ weaken [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2013, 13:02
Somebody pl explain why B is right? ( Not by POE)

Thanks in advance.
_________________

If KUDOS then gmatclub Test series.
YEAH!!

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 837
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 670 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 620 Q49 V26
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 542 [1] , given: 197

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Net Neutrality ~ weaken [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2013, 13:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
SmokedRing wrote:
Net Neutrality stipulates that Internet service providers (ISP) cannot partition their bandwidth such that different types of Internet communications have different maximum bandwidth capacities. For example, an ISP cannot relegate high bandwidth voice-over-IP (VoIP) traffic to a separate tunnel in an attempt to ensure that users of low-bandwidth functions such as plain-text email are not slowed down by the high-bandwidth users. Some individuals support implementing Net Neutrality on the principle that one group (i.e., users of high-bandwidth services) should not be effectively penalized for the actions of another group (i.e., users of slow-bandwidth services, who have a special traffic lane carved out for them, thereby slowing high-bandwidth users).

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument of the supporters of Net Neutrality mentioned above?
A) The jobs of many high-bandwidth users require these individuals to use high-bandwidth services.
B) Placing no restrictions on the bandwidth of individuals who use high-bandwidth services would force ISPs to purchase massive amounts of expensive additional bandwidth, disproportionately increasing the price of access for low-bandwidth users.
C) A strong and well respected lobbying firm recently revealed it has been hired by large telecommunications firms to oppose Net Neutrality on the grounds that it infringes upon a private company's ability to do business.
D) One country that mandated Net Neutrality saw a decrease in satisfaction of Internet users.
E) A recent court ruling upheld the principle that technology companies cannot discriminate in whom they serve or how they serve users.


situation without net neutrality:
higher band width user getting penalized...by lower bandwidth users.
now supporters of net neutrality are supporting net neutrality ..because they are assuming that AFTER net neutrality is applied =>no group will be penalized.

we have to weaken supporters argument.

option B:Placing no restrictions on the bandwidth of individuals who use high-bandwidth services would force ISPs to purchase massive amounts of expensive additional bandwidth, disproportionately increasing the price of access for low-bandwidth users.

IN this case cost of lower bandwidth user will increase....so in this case reverse is happening ...here lower bandwidth users are getting penalized by higher bandwidth users.==>clearly the conlusion is not holding==>hence it weakens.

hope it helps
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 21
GMAT Date: 09-12-2013
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 35

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Net Neutrality ~ weaken [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2013, 13:28
blueseas wrote:
SmokedRing wrote:
Net Neutrality stipulates that Internet service providers (ISP) cannot partition their bandwidth such that different types of Internet communications have different maximum bandwidth capacities. For example, an ISP cannot relegate high bandwidth voice-over-IP (VoIP) traffic to a separate tunnel in an attempt to ensure that users of low-bandwidth functions such as plain-text email are not slowed down by the high-bandwidth users. Some individuals support implementing Net Neutrality on the principle that one group (i.e., users of high-bandwidth services) should not be effectively penalized for the actions of another group (i.e., users of slow-bandwidth services, who have a special traffic lane carved out for them, thereby slowing high-bandwidth users).

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument of the supporters of Net Neutrality mentioned above?
A) The jobs of many high-bandwidth users require these individuals to use high-bandwidth services.
B) Placing no restrictions on the bandwidth of individuals who use high-bandwidth services would force ISPs to purchase massive amounts of expensive additional bandwidth, disproportionately increasing the price of access for low-bandwidth users.
C) A strong and well respected lobbying firm recently revealed it has been hired by large telecommunications firms to oppose Net Neutrality on the grounds that it infringes upon a private company's ability to do business.
D) One country that mandated Net Neutrality saw a decrease in satisfaction of Internet users.
E) A recent court ruling upheld the principle that technology companies cannot discriminate in whom they serve or how they serve users.


situation without net neutrality:
higher band width user getting penalized...by lower bandwidth users.
now supporters of net neutrality are supporting net neutrality ..because they are assuming that AFTER net neutrality is applied =>no group will be penalized.

we have to weaken supporters argument.

option B:Placing no restrictions on the bandwidth of individuals who use high-bandwidth services would force ISPs to purchase massive amounts of expensive additional bandwidth, disproportionately increasing the price of access for low-bandwidth users.

IN this case cost of lower bandwidth user will increase....so in this case reverse is happening ...here lower bandwidth users are getting penalized by higher bandwidth users.==>clearly the conlusion is not holding==>hence it weakens.

hope it helps


Hi Blueseas,
Thanks. I got it now.
_________________

If KUDOS then gmatclub Test series.
YEAH!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Posts: 54
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.62
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 20

Re: Net Neutrality ~ weaken [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2013, 00:37
Net Neutrality stipulates that Internet service providers (ISP) cannot partition their bandwidth such that different types of Internet communications have different maximum bandwidth capacities. For example, an ISP cannot relegate high bandwidth voice-over-IP (VoIP) traffic to a separate tunnel in an attempt to ensure that users of low-bandwidth functions such as plain-text email are not slowed down by the high-bandwidth users. Some individuals support implementing Net Neutrality on the principle that one group (i.e., users of high-bandwidth services) should not be effectively penalized for the actions of another group (i.e., users of slow-bandwidth services, who have a special traffic lane carved out for them, thereby slowing high-bandwidth users).

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument of the supporters of Net Neutrality mentioned above?
A) The jobs of many high-bandwidth users require these individuals to use high-bandwidth services
this is fine but this answer choice does not relate to the relation given in the passages

B) Placing no restrictions on the bandwidth of individuals who use high-bandwidth services would force ISPs to purchase massive amounts of expensive additional bandwidth, disproportionately increasing the price of access for low-bandwidth users.
This is correct. This logic says that not HIgh band users but the low band users are affetced....exactly opposite to the conclusion

C) A strong and well respected lobbying firm recently revealed it has been hired by large telecommunications firms to oppose Net Neutrality on the grounds that it infringes upon a private company's ability to do business.
Too specific....talks about "a private company's busines ability"

D) One country that mandated Net Neutrality saw a decrease in satisfaction of Internet users.
Satisfaction of internet usage can be attributed to other reasons...a lot of assumptions

E) A recent court ruling upheld the principle that technology companies cannot discriminate in whom they serve or how they serve users.
It is in line with the conclusion
Re: Net Neutrality ~ weaken   [#permalink] 30 Sep 2013, 00:37
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Feedback from admissions: good or neutral? Skag55 1 18 Mar 2014, 05:04
2 Net Neutrality stipulates that Internet service providers kingb 4 06 Nov 2012, 18:07
1 Geopolitical advisors believe that introducing neutral third tarek99 6 02 Oct 2008, 06:37
How do I neutralize a low GPA? baer 3 24 Apr 2007, 07:33
ds - net income christoph 6 27 Dec 2005, 09:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Net Neutrality ~ weaken

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.