Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 16:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 463
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 6

Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2008, 08:08
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

26% (01:56) correct 74% (00:54) wrong based on 70 sessions
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

Please explain as well
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1436
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 222 [0], given: 1

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2008, 09:47
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

Please explain as well



A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC

D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 652
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 6

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2008, 13:51
IMO B.

A. of violating state laws for allowing -Judge overturned to allow ....
B. of their violating state laws to allow - refers to 'jet skis and other water bikes '
Judge overturned to allow ....
C. that it violates state laws that allowed - it is wrong pronoun, 'ban' can not violate law
D. that it violated state laws allowing - - it is wrong pronoun, 'ban' can not violate law
E. that state laws were being violated allowing - 'BEING'
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2501
Followers: 53

Kudos [?]: 507 [0], given: 19

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2008, 21:32
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.

A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

Please explain as well


Should be C. everything happend in the past so allowed should be ok. The logic for me is:

1. 9 moths ago the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound.
2. A judge overturned the ban by the country imposed on jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound.
3. The ban violated the state laws that allwoed the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.



A. ground of.......?
B. their? whose? do not know.
C. on the grounds that + a clause => should be ok.
D. "that it violated state laws allowing"? the county was not allowing anything.
E. passive.
_________________

Verbal: new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html


GT

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 00:31
IMO it should be D.

The ban violated the laws in the time it was in force, the laws are something fixed.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [1] , given: 0

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 00:50
1
This post received
KUDOS
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

Please explain as well


A & B are out because 'that' is preferred over 'of'
E-PASSIVE
C- 'VIOLATES',SHUD BE 'VIOLATED'

IMO D
OA?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1579
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 0

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2008, 01:26
icandy wrote:
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

Please explain as well



A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC
D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.


Sorry, but I did not get how it changes the meaning.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 588
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 20

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2010, 13:24
in option (E), the correct response, shouldn't there be a comma before "allowing"?
E. that state laws were being violated, allowing
that way, "allowing" implies an implication of the ban.

the ban violated...allowing...
someone shed morel light please
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 258 [0], given: 2

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2010, 08:28
so the idiom is on the grounds that? Is there any other possible construction? For example, on the grounds of?
Thanks
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 198
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 7

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2010, 11:05
grounds for is also a combination..
like I said, if you start basing your answers on idioms, you might end up eliminating at times a probable answer choice..

I can pretty much say that by my experience... goofed up 2 times.. trying to cut down there myself !
_________________

Gotta hit the 700 score this time... 3rd time lucky !
Give me some kudos... Like you, even I need them badly ;)

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Status: battlecruiser, operational...
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 985
Schools: Carey '16
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 71

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2010, 11:40
D. there's another thread just like this asking the same question. Not sure why it's considered a 700 lvl question. It's pretty simple?
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: I wish!
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 788
Followers: 108

Kudos [?]: 230 [0], given: 33

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 04 Aug 2010, 22:36
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

Please explain as well



"Ground of" is a wrong idiom.

"of violating" and "for allowing" are wordy and awkward phrases. Keeping both in mind we can eliminate options A and B.

The pronoun "their" in option B is ambiguous because there's no logical plural noun for it to refer to, but "it" can logically refer to "the ban." The pronoun "it" isn't ambiguous here in option C and D; it refers to "the ban" unambiguously.

E is indeed wordy and distorts the meaning. C has a tense error ("violates"), so D is the only answer choice without a grammar error.
_________________

RC videos rc-through-videos-99566.html
CR videos cr-through-videos-99033.html
SC videos sc-through-videos-98340.html
Quant videos quant-through-videos-102525.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1561
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 6

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 05 Aug 2010, 07:27
D for me.

"grounds for" is the correct idiom.

"grounds of" is incorrect.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 258 [0], given: 2

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2010, 13:04
oa is D
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 386
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 87

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2011, 01:24
icandy wrote:
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

Please explain as well



A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC

D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.



How does A change the meaning??
WHy is allowed wrong in C?
Why is allowing right in D???


PLease explain your answer ... PLEASE DO NOT JUST POST VOTES
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: GMAT BATTLE - WIN OR DIE
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 175
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 12-22-2011
GPA: 3.81
WE: General Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 13

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2011, 02:30
I would like to remined that we need find the best answer among og 5 answer choices.

we need elliminate 4 answers.

C we eliminate because of use incorrect tanse "judge overturned" - past simple, so we have no reason to switch to present simple "it violates".

D correct use of tanse "judge overturned" and "it violated"

A and B incorrect use "ground of"

E "state laws were being" we have no reason to use "were being"


siddhans wrote:
icandy wrote:
Nihit wrote:
. Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the ground of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways.
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing

Please explain as well



A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC

D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.



How does A change the meaning??
WHy is allowed wrong in C?
Why is allowing right in D???


PLease explain your answer ... PLEASE DO NOT JUST POST VOTES
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 386
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 87

Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2011, 02:40
WishMasterUA wrote:
I would like to remined that we need find the best answer among og 5 answer choices.

we need elliminate 4 answers.

C we eliminate because of use incorrect tanse "judge overturned" - past simple, so we have no reason to switch to present simple "it violates".

D correct use of tanse "judge overturned" and "it violated"

A and B incorrect use "ground of"

E "state laws were being" we have no reason to use "were being"


siddhans wrote:
icandy wrote:


A changes the meaning as if state laws were do not allow the use of personal WC

D is correct. C is wrong for allowed. allow might have been a different issue.



How does A change the meaning??
WHy is allowed wrong in C?
Why is allowing right in D???


PLease explain your answer ... PLEASE DO NOT JUST POST VOTES


what about allowing in d...its not parallel to violated
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Sick of Refreshing Email
Joined: 10 Mar 2011
Posts: 100
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3.6
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 3

GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2011, 20:17
Even I picked C because I missed violates and violated -

Lets say you are reporting this news (at that moment the ban is already overturned)
- Judge overturned the ban on the ground that it violated state laws allowing.....
- Judge overturned the ban on the ground that it violates state laws that allowed.....

So its not about allowed or allowing.

I hope it makes sense.
_________________

Thanks
Sumeet
www.midasreturns.wordpress.com

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Back to (GMAT) Times Square!!!
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Posts: 189
Location: United States (IL)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 25

Reviews Badge
Re: Grounds : SC [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2011, 02:54
We need 'allowing' in the end because of cause-effect situation, E has being, A - was judje violating anything?. Hence D.
_________________

Working towards a goal...
V.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 155
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 3

Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2011, 21:04
I got the answer but it took me way longer than 1 min and 30 seconds :x
Re: Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water   [#permalink] 28 Nov 2011, 21:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 GMATPREP ChallengeQ -Nine months after the county banned jet PiyushK 6 19 Aug 2014, 06:20
Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water spriya 9 13 Oct 2008, 22:29
3 Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other motor zoom612 15 29 Jul 2006, 21:17
During the first nine months of 1979, textbook publishers WinWinMBA 7 09 Jun 2005, 16:01
Eight years ago hunting was banned in Greenfield County on WinWinMBA 6 19 May 2005, 12:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.