Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 May 2013, 19:00
Customize  |  Hide

No mathematician today would flatly refuse to accept the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 327
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
No mathematician today would flatly refuse to accept the [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2003, 10:17
00:00

Question Stats:

100% (04:41) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
No mathematician today would flatly refuse to accept the results of an enormous computation as an adequate demonstration of the truth of a theorem. In 1976, however, this was not the case. Some mathematicians at that time refused to accept the results of a complex computer demonstration of a very simple mapping theorem. Although some mathematicians still hold a strong belief that a simple theorem ought to have a short, simple proof, in fact, some simple theorems have required enormous proofs.

If all of the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following must also be true?

(A) Today, some mathematicians who believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof would consider accepting the results of an enormous computation as a demonstration of the truth of a theorem.

(B) Some individuals who believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof are not mathematicians.

(C) Today, some individuals who refuse to accept the results of an enormous computation as a demonstration of the truth of a theorem believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof.

(D) Some individuals who do not believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof would not be willing to accept the results of an enormous computation as proof of a complex theorem.

(E) Some nonmathematicians do not believe that a simple theorem ought to have a simple proof.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2003, 10:26
A)
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 560
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2003, 10:32
Is it A ?
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2003, 11:04
some mathematicians believe that simple theorem can't have complex proof, but some may agree on the opposite

A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 327
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2003, 15:33
:yes A
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2003, 15:47
asandeep wrote:
:yes A


gotta be good day after x-mas
  [#permalink] 26 Dec 2003, 15:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts No mathematician today would flatly refuse to accept the Praetorian 6 23 Sep 2003, 09:24
Popular new posts 2 No mathematician today would flatly refuse to accept the rohitgoel15 20 24 Jul 2010, 22:39
Popular new posts 1 Not only did Christopher Columbus refuse to accept the PTK 18 08 Aug 2010, 12:16
Popular new posts 5 Refusing to accept the conventional wisdom that the earth gmatpunjabi 11 02 Jan 2012, 10:03
New posts 1 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC GMAT Score - Accept or refuse publishing it arnijon90 2 10 May 2012, 11:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

No mathematician today would flatly refuse to accept the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.