|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 0
|
No one in the French department to which Professor Alban [#permalink]
04 Oct 2006, 20:36
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
No one in the French department to which Professor Alban belongs is allowed to teach more than one introductory level class in any one term. Moreover, the only language classes being taught next term are advanced ones. So it is untrue that both of the French classes Professor Alban will be teaching next term will be introductory level classes.
The pattern of reasoning displayed in the argument above is most closely paralleled by that in which one of the following arguments?
A. The Morrison Building will be fully occupied by May and since if a building is occupied by May the new tax rates apply to it, the Morrison building will be taxed according to the new rates.
B. The revised tax code does not apply at all to buildings built before 1900, and only the first section of the revised code applies to buildings built between 1900 and 1920, so the revised code does not apply to the Norton Building , since it was built in 1873.
C. All property on Overon Road will be reassessed for tax purposes by the end of the year and the Elnor Company headquarters is on Overton Road, so Elnor's property taxes will be higher next year.
D. New buildings that include public space are exempt from city taxes for two years and all new buildings in the city's Alton district are exempt for 5 years, so the building with the large public space that was recently completed in Alton will not be subject to city taxes next year.
E. Since according to recent statute, a building that is exempt from property taxes is charged for city water at a special rate, and hospitals are exempt from property taxes, Founder's Hospital will be charged for city water at the special rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 85
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
My choice: A
Structure: fact 1 followed by fact 2 followed by conclusion and fact 2 builds on fact 1
Only A and E follow this structure but in E fact 2 does not build on fact 1. Hence I go for A.
Confusing one ...
_________________
Try and try until you succeed! There is just no giving up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1185
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
I go for D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 386
Location: TX
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
C looks most llel.
Bet this is a LSAT CR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 327
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
I am up for (B).The second premise is not needed to arrive at the conclusion.
_________________
A well-balanced person is one who has a drink in each of his hands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1185
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
Now 4 of us got 4 answers. :D
sangarelli, I find the first one is not needed for reasoning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 85
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
sangarelli wrote: I am up for (B).The second premise is not needed to arrive at the conclusion.
But the second premise is needed. The first premise refers to term one. The second premise says that the next term has only advanced classes. Without this information, it cannot be concluded that both of the prof's classes cannot be introductory in the "next term".
hmmm on second thoughts .. think i might go for D.
_________________
Try and try until you succeed! There is just no giving up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 536
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Going for D.
Last edited by Juaz on 05 Oct 2006, 00:31, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 255
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
sangarelli wrote: I am up for (B).The second premise is not needed to arrive at the conclusion.
Well I am one of the minorties here that thinks it's B. B categorizes buildings before and after 1900, just as the same as categorizing French from intro to advanced level. The conclusion of "the revised code does not apply to the Norton Building , since it was built in 1873." parallels the conclusion that both of the French classes Professor Alban will be teaching next term will not be introductory level classes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1138
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
sangarelli wrote: I am up for (B).The second premise is not needed to arrive at the conclusion.
One more for B.
Second choice - D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 255
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Ooh Now 3 of us got B
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR French class ( parallel reasoning type) [#permalink]
05 Oct 2006, 02:51
laxieqv wrote: No one in the French department to which Professor Alban belongs is allowed to teach more than one introductory level class in any one term. Moreover, the only language classes being taught next term are advanced ones. So it is untrue that both of the French classes Professor Alban will be teaching next term will be introductory level classes.
The pattern of reasoning displayed in the argument above is most closely paralleled by that in which one of the following arguments?
A. The Morrison Building will be fully occupied by May and since if a building is occupied by May the new tax rates apply to it, the Morrison building will be taxed according to the new rates.
B. The revised tax code does not apply at all to buildings built before 1900, and only the first section of the revised code applies to buildings built between 1900 and 1920, so the revised code does not apply to the Norton Building , since it was built in 1873.
C. All property on Overon Road will be reassessed for tax purposes by the end of the year and the Elnor Company headquarters is on Overton Road, so Elnor's property taxes will be higher next year.
D. New buildings that include public space are exempt from city taxes for two years and all new buildings in the city's Alton district are exempt for 5 years, so the building with the large public space that was recently completed in Alton will not be subject to city taxes next year.
E. Since according to recent statute, a building that is exempt from property taxes is charged for city water at a special rate, and hospitals are exempt from property taxes, Founder's Hospital will be charged for city water at the special rate.
How about seeing this problem as Data sufficiency problem?
Statement 1. No one in the French department to which Professor Alban belongs is allowed to teach more than one introductory level class in any one term.
Statement 2. Moreover, the only language classes being taught next term are advanced ones.
Conclusion: It is untrue that both of the French classes Professor Alban will be teaching next term will be introductory level classes.
going by DS rules, we can come to the conclusion by using either of the statements.
Now I will consider Option D.
Statement 1: New buildings that include public space are exempt from city taxes for two years
Statement 2: All new buildings in the city's Alton district are exempt for 5 years
Conclusion: So the building with the large public space that was recently completed in Alton will not be subject to city taxes next year
going by DS rules, we can come to the conclusion by using either of the statements.
So D is my answer.
_________________
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 718
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
I'm with D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 0
|
I'll jump in and add to the chaos by choosing (E).  D seems too vague by it's use of the word recently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
GMATT73 wrote: I'll jump in and add to the chaos by choosing (E).  D seems too vague by it's use of the word recently.
building that is completed recently is a new buiding..
_________________
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 0
|
ak_idc wrote: GMATT73 wrote: I'll jump in and add to the chaos by choosing (E).  D seems too vague by it's use of the word recently. building that is completed recently is a new buiding.. 
I despise these kinds of CRs. Mindbending LSAT logic that just loves to chew up the clock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
I agree..
Laxie, please keep posting similar questions
_________________
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 0
|
ak_idc wrote: I agree.. Laxie, please keep posting similar questions 
Sure  ...have to admit that this type of question is freakingly tough  ..anyways, if you see it during test day, please be happy that you're performing well
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR French class ( parallel reasoning type) [#permalink]
05 Oct 2006, 10:44
ak_idc wrote: laxieqv wrote: No one in the French department to which Professor Alban belongs is allowed to teach more than one introductory level class in any one term. Moreover, the only language classes being taught next term are advanced ones. So it is untrue that both of the French classes Professor Alban will be teaching next term will be introductory level classes.
The pattern of reasoning displayed in the argument above is most closely paralleled by that in which one of the following arguments?
D. New buildings that include public space are exempt from city taxes for two years and all new buildings in the city's Alton district are exempt for 5 years, so the building with the large public space that was recently completed in Alton will not be subject to city taxes next year.
How about seeing this problem as Data sufficiency problem?Statement 1. No one in the French department to which Professor Alban belongs is allowed to teach more than one introductory level class in any one term. Statement 2. Moreover, the only language classes being taught next term are advanced ones. Conclusion: It is untrue that both of the French classes Professor Alban will be teaching next term will be introductory level classes. going by DS rules, we can come to the conclusion by using either of the statements. Now I will consider Option D. Statement 1: New buildings that include public space are exempt from city taxes for two years Statement 2: All new buildings in the city's Alton district are exempt for 5 years Conclusion: So the building with the large public space that was recently completed in Alton will not be subject to city taxes next year going by DS rules, we can come to the conclusion by using either of the statements. So D is my answer.
Such an exemplary explanation!  ...D is indeed the OA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 85
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
woohoo ... go D!
Thanks Laxieqv! Pls continue posting similar questions .. really helps improve on timing and accuracy
btw whats the source?
_________________
Try and try until you succeed! There is just no giving up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|