Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 16:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Status: 1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 513
Location: United States (FL)
Schools: UFL (A)
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 2: 590 Q35 V35
GMAT 3: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 4: 610 Q44 V30
GPA: 3.45
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 747 [1] , given: 630

Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2013, 09:18
1
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:00) correct 43% (01:19) wrong based on 381 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

A. Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

B. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.

C. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if they carry a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.

D. Not every woman, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

E. Not all women, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, considered a serious risk factor for that cancer.

oe to follow
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3722
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 5867 [7] , given: 66

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2013, 16:33
7
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
avohden wrote:
Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

A. Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.
B. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.
C. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if they carry a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.
D. Not every woman, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.
E. Not all women, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, considered a serious risk factor for that cancer.

Dear avohden,
I'm happy to help with this one.

Split #1: SV Agreement with indefinite pronouns. See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-sente ... agreement/
The phrase "every woman" is singular, and demands the singular verb "wants".
The phrase "all women" is plural, and demands the plural verb "want".
Choices (C) & (D) make SV Agreement errors, so they are wrong.

Split #2: pronoun agreement with indefinite pronouns.
The phrase "every woman" is singular, and demands the singular pronoun "she".
The phrase "all women" is plural, and demands the plural pronoun "they".
Choices (B) & (D) make pronoun agreement errors, so they are wrong.

Just with those two, that's enough to isolate (A) as the only possible answer.

What's intriguing about this sentence is that it has all kinds of splits that are not really relevant to the question --- ultimately, false splits, because either way is correct.
(1) We could say this statement about "every woman" or "all women", and as long as verbs & pronouns match, it would be fine.
(2) Either "even those" or "even ones" is perfectly correct.
(3) Two options for modifying the mutation:
"...a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer." ---- an appositive phrase; see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... e-phrases/
"...a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancerr." --- a subordinate clause, acting as noun modifier. See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... d-clauses/
The first might be a tad wordier, but both are grammatically correct and sound natural.
Good tempting false splits are the sign of a very well written SC problem.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 91
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 660 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 66 [1] , given: 45

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 09:06
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
mikemcgarry wrote:
avohden wrote:
Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

A. Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.
B. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.
C. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if they carry a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.
D. Not every woman, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.
E. Not all women, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, considered a serious risk factor for that cancer.

Dear avohden,
I'm happy to help with this one.

Split #1: SV Agreement with indefinite pronouns. See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-sente ... agreement/
The phrase "every woman" is singular, and demands the singular verb "wants".
The phrase "all women" is plural, and demands the plural verb "want".
Choices (C) & (D) make SV Agreement errors, so they are wrong.

Split #2: pronoun agreement with indefinite pronouns.
The phrase "every woman" is singular, and demands the singular pronoun "she".
The phrase "all women" is plural, and demands the plural pronoun "they".
Choices (B) & (D) make pronoun agreement errors, so they are wrong.

Just with those two, that's enough to isolate (A) as the only possible answer.

What's intriguing about this sentence is that it has all kinds of splits that are not really relevant to the question --- ultimately, false splits, because either way is correct.
(1) We could say this statement about "every woman" or "all women", and as long as verbs & pronouns match, it would be fine.
(2) Either "even those" or "even ones" is perfectly correct.
(3) Two options for modifying the mutation:
"...a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer." ---- an appositive phrase; see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... e-phrases/
"...a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancerr." --- a subordinate clause, acting as noun modifier. See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... d-clauses/
The first might be a tad wordier, but both are grammatically correct and sound natural.
Good tempting false splits are the sign of a very well written SC problem.

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Hi Mike,

There is something I quite don't get in the correct sentence.

As you said, "not every woman" is singular. But then, when it comes to specify the "singular" woman, the sentence use "those". Is it logical to refer back to a singular noun with "those"?
Senior Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 265
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 401

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 12:33
avohden wrote:
Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

A. Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

B. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.

C. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if they carry a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.

D. Not every woman, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

E. Not all women, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, considered a serious risk factor for that cancer.

oe to follow

In this one, I did not know if "Not every woman was" was correct or not.
But I find it right in less than 2 minutes.

This was my process:

A. Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer. - Correct

B. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer. - She is not correct because sentence is plural

C. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if they carry a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer. -They is not correct because sentence is singular

D. Not every woman, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer. She is not correct because sentence is plural

E. Not all women, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, considered a serious risk factor for that cancer She is not correct because sentence is plural
_________________

Think outside the box

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3722
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 5867 [1] , given: 66

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 15:18
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
nechets wrote:
Hi Mike,

There is something I quite don't get in the correct sentence.

As you said, "not every woman" is singular. But then, when it comes to specify the "singular" woman, the sentence use "those". Is it logical to refer back to a singular noun with "those"?

Dear nechets,
OK, you asked a very subtle question, and I am happy to help.

The expression "every woman", or "not every woman", are grammatically singular, but of course, logically, we know we are referring to more than one woman in this statement. The word "those" does not refer to all of the women, but to a subgroup, the women who have meet a particular condition. It's perfectly fine to refer to the whole group by a singular indefinite form, and the subgroup as a plural set. Again, logically, we know the whole group contains a lot of individual women, even though it's represented in a grammatically singular form, so there's no problem that a subgroup is plural.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 39
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 26

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2013, 06:50
avohden wrote:
Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

A. Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

B. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.

C. Not all women, even those who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, wants to know if they carry a BRCA mutation, which is a serious risk factor for that cancer.

D. Not every woman, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, a serious risk factor for that cancer.

E. Not all women, even the ones who have a strong familial history of breast cancer, want to know if she carries a BRCA mutation, considered a serious risk factor for that cancer.

oe to follow

The fastest way I found to solve this question is as follow.

A: wants (Singular) carries(Singular) Correct
B: want (plural) carries(Singular) Wrong
C: wants (Singular) carry (Plural) Wrong
D: want (plural) carries(Singular) Wrong
E: want (plural) carries(Singular) Wrong

I hope it helps
Director
Status: 1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 513
Location: United States (FL)
Schools: UFL (A)
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 2: 590 Q35 V35
GMAT 3: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 4: 610 Q44 V30
GPA: 3.45
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 747 [0], given: 630

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2013, 10:25
Official Explanation

- In this example, you must make sure that you have proper agreement between both the subject and verb and the pronoun and antecedent. Only (A) contains proper agreement on both counts. In (B) the singular “she” improperly refers back to the plural subject women. In (C) “Not all women…wants” is an error of subject-verb agreement. Likewise in (D), “Not every woman…want” contains a similar error. (E), like (B) improperly uses “she” to refer to “women” Only (A) uses the proper “wants” and “she” to go with the singular subject woman.
Current Student
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 34

Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2014, 06:16
mikemcgarry wrote:
nechets wrote:
Hi Mike,

There is something I quite don't get in the correct sentence.

As you said, "not every woman" is singular. But then, when it comes to specify the "singular" woman, the sentence use "those". Is it logical to refer back to a singular noun with "those"?

Dear nechets,
OK, you asked a very subtle question, and I am happy to help.

The expression "every woman", or "not every woman", are grammatically singular, but of course, logically, we know we are referring to more than one woman in this statement. The word "those" does not refer to all of the women, but to a subgroup, the women who have meet a particular condition. It's perfectly fine to refer to the whole group by a singular indefinite form, and the subgroup as a plural set. Again, logically, we know the whole group contains a lot of individual women, even though it's represented in a grammatically singular form, so there's no problem that a subgroup is plural.

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Mike ,
Are these 3 sentences correct on GMAT:
1. The GDP of Brazil is larger than those of India and Korea.
2. The GDPs of India and Korea are smaller than that of Brazil.
3. The melting points of most metals are 100 degrees above room temperature, but that of mercury is below 0 degree.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3722
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 5867 [0], given: 66

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2014, 08:43
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
tushain wrote:
Mike ,
Are these 3 sentences correct on GMAT:
1. The GDP of Brazil is larger than those of India and Korea.
2. The GDPs of India and Korea are smaller than that of Brazil.
3. The melting points of most metals are 100 degrees above room temperature, but that of mercury is below 0 degree.

Dear tushain,
My friend, this is subtle. In math, you can make up your own examples of math questions ("would this be right?" questions), and chances are, it will be clean question, focused only on the math about which you intend to ask. Verbal is very different.

For example, the first is fine as a demonstrative example sentence illustrating a grammar point, but that doesn't mean it's ideal as a GMAT sentence. You have to understand, the standards for the GMAT SC are very high --- the sentence has to be grammatically correct, the logic must be flawless, and the topic must be meaningful and interesting. This sentence is too short, too simple, to even begin to qualify as a proper GMAT SC sentence. The grammar is correct in #1 & #2, and yes, the grammar there could appear in a much more complex and meaningful sentence as the correct answer to a SC question. The grammar could appear, but these particular sentences are too short and simple to appear.

The logical construction of the comparison is shaky in #2 --- are we comparing the sum of those in India & Korea to that of Brazil, or are we comparing them separately and independently? Also, "smaller" is not the most natural word --- we need "less" to compare numbers. You see, in trying to ask about grammar, you introduced a number of other problems. One suggestion:
2. The GDP of India, like that of Korea, is less than that of Brazil.
Now, this is grammatically & logically correct, although I don't think it's long and complex enough that we could make a good SC question out of it.

The final sentence is grammatically correct as well, and this is starting to get to a level of length and complexity such that it might quality for a good SC sentence.

It's important to keep two very different things in mind: (a) could the grammar in the sentence appear in a larger sentence on the GMAT? vs. (b) could the sentence itself appear on the GMAT? Certainly for #1 & #3, we could say "yes" to (a), but probably not to (b).

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Current Student
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 34

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2014, 09:56
mikemcgarry wrote:
tushain wrote:
Mike ,
Are these 3 sentences correct on GMAT:
1. The GDP of Brazil is larger than those of India and Korea.
2. The GDPs of India and Korea are smaller than that of Brazil.
3. The melting points of most metals are 100 degrees above room temperature, but that of mercury is below 0 degree.

Dear tushain,
My friend, this is subtle. In math, you can make up your own examples of math questions ("would this be right?" questions), and chances are, it will be clean question, focused only on the math about which you intend to ask. Verbal is very different.

For example, the first is fine as a demonstrative example sentence illustrating a grammar point, but that doesn't mean it's ideal as a GMAT sentence. You have to understand, the standards for the GMAT SC are very high --- the sentence has to be grammatically correct, the logic must be flawless, and the topic must be meaningful and interesting. This sentence is too short, too simple, to even begin to qualify as a proper GMAT SC sentence. The grammar is correct in #1 & #2, and yes, the grammar there could appear in a much more complex and meaningful sentence as the correct answer to a SC question. The grammar could appear, but these particular sentences are too short and simple to appear.

The logical construction of the comparison is shaky in #2 --- are we comparing the sum of those in India & Korea to that of Brazil, or are we comparing them separately and independently? Also, "smaller" is not the most natural word --- we need "less" to compare numbers. You see, in trying to ask about grammar, you introduced a number of other problems. One suggestion:
2. The GDP of India, like that of Korea, is less than that of Brazil.
Now, this is grammatically & logically correct, although I don't think it's long and complex enough that we could make a good SC question out of it.

The final sentence is grammatically correct as well, and this is starting to get to a level of length and complexity such that it might quality for a good SC sentence.

It's important to keep two very different things in mind: (a) could the grammar in the sentence appear in a larger sentence on the GMAT? vs. (b) could the sentence itself appear on the GMAT? Certainly for #1 & #3, we could say "yes" to (a), but probably not to (b).

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Mike, "those" in #1 stands for GDP "
"that in #2 stands for GDPs"
"that in #3 stands for melting points "
How is pronoun usage okay? i dont understand
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3722
Followers: 1299

Kudos [?]: 5867 [0], given: 66

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2014, 06:04
tushain wrote:
Mike, "those" in #1 stands for GDP "
"that in #2 stands for GDPs"
"that in #3 stands for melting points "
How is pronoun usage okay? i dont understand

Dear tushain,
The pronouns "this," "that," "these," and "those" are demonstrative pronouns. Their rules are somewhat different from the rules for personal pronouns (he, she, they, etc.) Magoosh has grammar lessons explaining this distinction in detail. I highly recommend joining Magoosh to see those lessons.
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10543
Followers: 920

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2016, 04:03
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Not every woman, even those who have a strong familial   [#permalink] 21 Jul 2016, 04:03
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
19 In these difficult economic times, those who have public 13 03 Nov 2013, 18:49
Those who have visited the Grand Canyon have typically seen 13 05 Aug 2009, 03:45
Those who have visited the Grand Canyon have typically seen 2 13 Oct 2008, 02:04
Those who have visited the Grand Canyon have typically seen 10 05 Aug 2008, 02:25
Those who have visited the Grand Canyon have typically seen 2 14 Apr 2008, 09:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by