Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2016, 12:27
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

4 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 38
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 46 [4] , given: 4

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2011, 15:34
4
This post received
KUDOS
17
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

40% (02:09) correct 60% (01:10) wrong based on 453 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
(a)
(b) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
(c) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
(d) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
(e) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 263
Schools: UC Berkley, UCLA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 73 [1] , given: 66

Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2011, 15:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
daryayurlova wrote:
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
(a)
(b) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
(c) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
(d) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
(e) The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it


I don't agree with the OA.
The idiom not only...but also is being tested here and D fails in that account.
Same with E and C.

In B, the construction is used wrongly. It says " Not only did something do something, but also did something else." The relative pronoun it must be added to indicate that the systematic clearing of forests also caused erosion. So the proper construction is, "Not only did something do something, but it also did something else."

Your answer should be A IMHO.

Mari
_________________

Thank you for your kudoses Everyone!!!


"It always seems impossible until its done."
-Nelson Mandela

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 38
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 4

Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2011, 15:56
mariyea wrote:
I don't agree with the OA.
The idiom not only...but also is being tested here and D fails in that account.
Same with E and C.

In B, the construction is used wrongly. It says " Not only did something do something, but also did something else." The relative pronoun it must be added to indicate that the systematic clearing of forests also caused erosion. So the proper construction is, "Not only did something do something, but it also did something else."

Your answer should be A IMHO.

Mari


I was also looking for a pair not only, but also and eliminated B for the other reason, namely: improper use of which - modifies farmland while the intended meaning is modifying the whole preceding clause .... thanks for additional reason to eliminate B ... about idiom I think i read some thread with Q where but also was also used without not only and it was correct .... I think A is wrong because it should be Not only did <...> create and GIVE not gave! Does that make sense?
Would be good to hear the OE ... there must be something there
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 263
Schools: UC Berkley, UCLA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 66

Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2011, 15:58
daryayurlova wrote:
mariyea wrote:
I don't agree with the OA.
The idiom not only...but also is being tested here and D fails in that account.
Same with E and C.

In B, the construction is used wrongly. It says " Not only did something do something, but also did something else." The relative pronoun it must be added to indicate that the systematic clearing of forests also caused erosion. So the proper construction is, "Not only did something do something, but it also did something else."

Your answer should be A IMHO.

Mari


I was also looking for a pair not only, but also and eliminated B for the other reason, namely: improper use of which - modifies farmland while the intended meaning is modifying the whole preceding clause .... thanks for additional reason to eliminate B ... about idiom I think i read some thread with Q where but also was also used without not only and it was correct .... I think A is wrong because it should be Not only did <...> create and GIVE not gave! Does that make sense?
Would be good to hear the OE ... there must be something there


Yes you're right. In B, which is improperly used. And I agree that we need an OE here.
_________________

Thank you for your kudoses Everyone!!!


"It always seems impossible until its done."
-Nelson Mandela

3 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 327
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 565 [3] , given: 20

Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2011, 01:48
3
This post received
KUDOS

Not only DID the systematic clearing of forests CREATE farmland ..
and GIVE/GAVE consumers

GAVE is not correct ... did + 2nd form

'not only .. but also' construction is used for items that are logically parallel.
the first half of the sentence is positive (create/give) while the second half is negative (erosion/deforested) .. so the use of this construction is not appropriate

D is the correct ans. HTH



_________________

press kudos, if you like the explanation, appreciate the effort or encourage people to respond.

Download the Ultimate SC Flashcards

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 75
Location: Israel
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Operations (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 2

Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2011, 06:32
+1 D. Agree with dimitry92.
X not only..... but it also - this is totally possible! The second trap in this Q is gave..... created.
Implying both factors, the only possible answer is D!
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Followers: 53

Kudos [?]: 292 [2] , given: 1

Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2011, 23:16
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
So sneaky of them!

The test writers know that many students who do their homework will see the "not only" trigger and look for a "but also" bookend. If you have the first half of that construction, you should probably have the second. *But* the sneaky twist is that if you have the second half ("but also") you don't necessarily need the first ("not only").

Ex:
She likes not only shaggy puppies, but also short-haired ones. *CORRECT*

He studies a lot, but he also likes to have fun.
*STILL CORRECT*


Great catch mari and daryayurlova on the lack of verb parallelism in two different places in this sentence. "Not only"/"but also" is indeed a parallelism marker, so that knocks off (A) ("create"/"gave" are not in parallel tenses), (B) ("caused" is missing a subject so that clause is not parallel to the first part), and (E) ("created"/"it caused" are not parallel).

That leaves (C) and (D), neither of which contain "not only"-- both choices use "but also" to mean X BUT (also/additionally) Y, which is a perfectly valid usage, though less emphasized in most GMAT curricula.

"But" is still a parallelism marker. Break down C and D to their underlying skeletons:

(C) contains a modifier between those two commas ("creating farmland.furniture), so the core of (C) is really "The clearing, but also..." So what should follow to maintain parallelism? Another noun or noun phrase-- instead we have a verb ("caused")-- the core of (C) would read "the clearing but also caused erosion..."-- that doesn't make any sense! Eliminate.

Try the same thing for (D):
The clearing...created farmland...and gave (stuff)..., but it (the clearing!) also caused erosion.

The underlying structure is
subject verb and verb, but subject also verb.

Parallel and correct!
_________________


JP Park | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Los Angeles

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 38
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 46 [1] , given: 4

Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2011, 23:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
Wow Parker,
What an exhaustive and detailed reply! Was worth waiting a month to get such a brilliant explanation! Eventhough I already had my exam still thank you!

Posted from my mobile device Image
Expert Post
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Followers: 53

Kudos [?]: 292 [0], given: 1

Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2011, 23:45
Expert's post
You're very welcome. Sorry it wasn't able to be useful to you on your exam, but congrats on being done!
_________________


JP Park | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Los Angeles

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 920
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 292 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Feb 2011, 01:01
This was #41 on on the gmatprep and I got it wrong. +1 to D for the reasons given by parker.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 920
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 292 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: GMAT Prep US forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Feb 2011, 01:02
See the core of the sentence first before "blindly" using the not only..but also bullet. its not gonna work here. :-)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 4

Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 May 2013, 22:59
A question on the touch rule for which. In choice b:

(b) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

does which refer to farmland, or (Northeast)? That is, does which ignore parenthetical statements? I understand that solving this issue isn't necessary for getting the right answer, but I want to make sure I'm clear on the touch rule concept.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 473
Location: India
GPA: 2.5
WE: Operations (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 59

Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2013, 01:00
banaorange wrote:
A question on the touch rule for which. In choice b:

(b) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

does which refer to farmland, or (Northeast)? That is, does which ignore parenthetical statements? I understand that solving this issue isn't necessary for getting the right answer, but I want to make sure I'm clear on the touch rule concept.



Hi, which follows a strict touch noun rule...even when noun is in parentheses or prepositional phrase. for prepositional phrase nouns the only exception is with "verb ed" which especially for "...in...." does not necessarily modify the proximate noun, unless it makes sense in doing so.

hope this helps.
_________________

"When the going gets tough, the tough gets going!"

Bring ON SOME KUDOS MATES+++



-----------------------------
Quant Notes consolidated: consolodited-quant-guides-of-forum-most-helpful-in-preps-151067.html#p1217652

My GMAT journey begins: my-gmat-journey-begins-122251.html

All about Richard Ivey: all-about-richard-ivey-148594.html#p1190518

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7643
Followers: 709

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2014, 21:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7643
Followers: 709

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Dec 2015, 07:34
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 75
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 10

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Dec 2015, 12:14
Very good question.

It's tricky because on the first place you think that we need to find the idiom.

However as we don't have any match with idiom, we have to find something else:

A) Idiom Error
B) Idiom Error, Modifier Error
C) Idiom Error, incomplete sentence
D) Correct, here we have 2 complete clauses, that are separated with a comma and with "but"
E) Idiom Error
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2015
Posts: 110
Concentration: Real Estate, International Business
GMAT 1: 600 Q33 V40
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 3

Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2016, 14:52
I love carrots, but I hate broccoli. This is completely fine and does not use a, "not only." Also notice that I went from something positive to something negative like the statement did.

All of the statements either have a verb error or imply that farmland gave consumers houses. D is the only one that is correct in grammar and context.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 103
GPA: 3.84
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 69

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2016, 22:45
i believe here gmatprep is testing more about meaning than about idiom...their are two things Positive impact and negative impact...
Not only and but also cant be used for two different poles....so all options using this will be wrong
D is clear..it said that x created y but it also created z---perfect
_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2012
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 148

CAT Tests
Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Feb 2016, 09:02
daryayurlova wrote:
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
(a)
(b) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also


Can we say that in sentence A and B dont have an independent clause??? Please help..

I eliminated A and B for the reason mentioned above. I need to know whether my reasoning is correct or not.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Expert
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 539
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Followers: 79

Kudos [?]: 362 [1] , given: 10

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Feb 2016, 02:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
sowragu wrote:
daryayurlova wrote:
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
(a)
(b) Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also


Can we say that in sentence A and B dont have an independent clause??? Please help..

I eliminated A and B for the reason mentioned above. I need to know whether my reasoning is correct or not.


First note that not only..but also is a conjunction, a correlative conjunction.

Now option A: There are 2 independent clauses in this sentence as shown below (the verb error in the first clause is corrected):

Independent clause 1: The systematic clearing of forests in the United States did create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and give consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture.
Independent clause 2: It caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

These 2 independent clauses are joined by a correlative conjunction not only.. but also.

Now option B: There are 2 independent clauses in this sentence too as shown below (The modifier error in the first clause and the subject error in the second clause are corrected):

Independent clause 1: The systematic clearing of forests in the United States did create farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture.
Independent clause 2: It caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

Again these 2 independent clauses are joined by a correlative conjunction not only.. but also.

Therefore one cannot eliminate option A and option B on the ground that there is no independent clause. In each sentence there are 2 independent clauses joined by a correlative conjunction.
Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the   [#permalink] 28 Feb 2016, 02:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the uledssul 10 09 Aug 2012, 04:45
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the FN 11 23 Aug 2007, 15:55
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the johnycute 6 21 Jun 2007, 06:40
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the Allen760 14 23 Dec 2006, 09:51
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the KC 15 23 Oct 2006, 13:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.