Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 09:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 167
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2006, 12:54
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (01:34) correct 25% (00:30) wrong based on 24 sessions
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 213
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2006, 13:02
(A)
Only between (A) and (B).Pronoun "which" in (B) incorrectly refers to "farmland" giving relatively inexpensive houses and furniture rather than "systematic clearing of forests" giving relatively inexpensive houses and furniture.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2006, 18:31
A if the gave is converted to give.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 847
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 1

Re: SC - Systematic Clearing [#permalink] New post 23 Oct 2006, 18:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
D

The use of "not only" in the original sentence can be misleading. Here the two effects of clearing the forests are opposite (one is beneficial, the other is detrimental). So, D stands for correct meaning and verb usage.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 385
Location: TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Oct 2006, 09:03
Dirty little SC

Agree with Anand on but , but "also" at the end of D makes it unidiomatic.

Betting on A..
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 153
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Oct 2006, 20:18
D 2.

A is not parrallel.
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5252
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: SC - Systematic Clearing [#permalink] New post 25 Oct 2006, 22:15
anandsebastin wrote:
D

The use of "not only" in the original sentence can be misleading. Here the two effects of clearing the forests are opposite (one is beneficial, the other is detrimental). So, D stands for correct meaning and verb usage.

Exactly. Most test-takers fall for the "not only...but also.." trap when misused in this way.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Oct 2006, 00:19
Not a very Easy one Really

What is Wrong with C.....cant we use but also...alone....

but i think the OA is B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 167
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Oct 2006, 17:33
OA is A =)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2012
Posts: 37
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2012, 17:40
Viperace wrote:
D 2.

A is not parrallel.
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused


Agreed. I'm not sure how the OA is A...can anyone explain given the above?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 4

Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2012, 23:35
A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

did and caused are parallel. It in the second part refers to the systematic clearing of forests. Looks fine. Gave and did is parallel, so that is correct too.

B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

Which refers to the farmland. Changes the meaning of the sentence. Second part has no pronoun.

C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

Usage of but is inappropriate. There is no contrast in this construction of the sentence.

D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

Usage of but is inappropriate. There is no contrast in this construction of the sentence.

E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

Not only ... but also pair is incomplete. Subjunctive usage of 'giving' again changes the meaning. It implies the act of creating of farmland led to providing of inexpensive houses. This is nonsensical.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: SLOGGING : My son says,This time Papa u will have to make it : Innocence is BLISS
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 211
Location: India
WE: Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 30

CAT Tests
Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 04:58
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

My understanding :

we are looking for NOT ONLY ............ BUT ALSO construction as per stem

A : Not only................But IT also ======== Parallelism broken = Eliminate
E : not only.................But IT also ========== parallelism broken = Eliminate

Bxn B/C/D :

B : ...............farmaland WHICH = guess its not the farmlands that gave consumers X and Y but the clearing of forests that yielded X and Y = Eliminate

C : The systematic clearing of forests , (MODIFIER ), .........BUT also................. ============Remove the modifier and reread = doesn't make any sense = Eliminated

D : Left only with D

The systematic clearing of forests CREATED X and GAVE Y, but IT also caused.................

Not only should be followed by BUT also but the reveerse is not a gos[pel truth

Leading to D = my take
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1300

Kudos [?]: 3682 [2] , given: 185

Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 06:13
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi All,

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

Let's first understand the intended meaning of the sentence. The sentence is talking about two effects of systematic clearing of forests in the US.

Positive aspects:
a. It created farmland.
b. It gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture.

Negative aspects:
a. It caused erosion.
b. It deforested whole region very quickly.

Error Analysis: There are two positive effects of systematic clearing of forests. The first entity has the verb “did create” and the second verb is “gave”. This is incorrect because “did” is applicable to both the verbs. Hence, use of “create” is correct but use of “gave” is incorrect because we cannot write past tense verb after “did”.

POE:

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also: Incorrect for the reason stated above.

B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also: Incorrect.
1. By removing “and”, this choice has removed the intended list in the sentence. This change distorts the meaning. Rather than saying that clearing of forests led to two positive effects, this choice presents the second effect as the result of the first effect.
2. Relative pronoun “which” incorrectly refers to “farmland”, meaning that farmland gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture.

C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also: Incorrect.
1. There is no main verb in the first part of the sentence. We have a fragment here.
2. Verb-ing modifiers preceded by comma modify the preceding clause. There is no clause preceding these modifiers because there is no main verb.

D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also: Correct. Notice that it is not necessary to use the idiom “not only… but also…” here. The sentence essentially is presenting the positive and the negative sides of the systematic clearing of forests. The first part of the sentence is presenting the two positive effects in correct parallel manner. “but” correctly presents the contrast and is followed by the negative effects of clearing of forests. Essentially, there is no change in the intended meaning of the sentence. This choice is still presenting the two contrasting sides of clearing of forests.

E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it: Incorrect. By removing “and”, this choice removes the intended parallel list. Per the original sentence, there are two independent positive effects of systematic clearing of forests. But this choice makes the second independent effect the result of the first effect. By doing so, this choice distorts the meaning of the sentence.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 267

Kudos [?]: 1705 [0], given: 249

Premium Member
Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 07:44
Expert's post
A simple requisite of not only is the element of inbuilt accentuation. But here there is no such accentuation but only a contrast. Therefore a rapid fire shot will be to eliminate all ‘not only’ choices summarily( whether accompanied by but also or not) namely A, B and E and then squarely dump C for holding a fragment, and end up finally with the bull’s eye hit of D
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 295
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 27

Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink] New post 22 Feb 2014, 01:05
of course, A is wrong because of "give/gave"
another wrong point in A.

not only ...but also is used to show two similar things at the one side. I am not only good but also inteligent. she is not only lazy but also stupid

in contrast, "but also" is used to show the contradiction between the two things. In this case, D is logic.

do you agree with me?
_________________

If anyone in this gmat forum is in England,Britain, pls, email to me, (thanghnvn@gmail.com) . I have some questions and need your advise. Thank a lot.

Re: Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the   [#permalink] 22 Feb 2014, 01:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the daryayurlova 12 27 Jan 2011, 14:34
10 Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the hasham222 13 20 Jul 2009, 02:40
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the mymba99 13 21 May 2008, 05:18
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the FN 11 23 Aug 2007, 14:55
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the johnycute 6 21 Jun 2007, 05:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.