Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Nov 2014, 19:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3401
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 2

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 14:55
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses andfurniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States createfarmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensivehouses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States createfarmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relativelyinexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland(especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive housesand furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive housesand furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland(especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses andfurniture, but it
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 161
Schools: CBS, MIT, Kellogg, Wharton
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 5

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 15:08
D for me :)

All due respect, A doesn't make sense as you read it :) Two effects, positive and negative, are described. You have to have contrast.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 321
Location: Orange County, CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 15:57
Quote:
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses andfurniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States createfarmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensivehouses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States createfarmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relativelyinexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland(especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive housesand furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive housesand furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland(especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses andfurniture, but it


I'd go with E.

Created is paralell with Caused.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 21:21
I think the answer is D. Two opposite statements contrasted using but.

In E, "not only - but also" is used and also is missing in the sentence
in D and E, Created is paralell with Caused.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 197
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 21:30
I guess it's D because "Not only ... but also" idiomatic expression is used to compliment one point to another similar one. This one is more like 'Despite' sentence.

What's the OA please??
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 463
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 21:32
misterJJ2u wrote:
Quote:
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses andfurniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States createfarmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensivehouses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States createfarmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relativelyinexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland(especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive housesand furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive housesand furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland(especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses andfurniture, but it


I'd go with E.

Created is paralell with Caused.


But It is missing "but also" to complement "not only"
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 930
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 22:00
Note:

"Not Only......But Also"

This is a common construction in GMAT.
We believe that "Not only" should be followed by "but also".

However, in some cases we can omit "also" to emphasize the first part of the construction.

Ex-

You are not only genius but a living legend.

In this question, we may get confused between A and D.

In A.

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

In D, we can use above rule and it should be fine.


- Brajesh
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 44
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 22:23
b14kumar wrote:
Note:

"Not Only......But Also"

This is a common construction in GMAT.
We believe that "Not only" should be followed by "but also".

However, in some cases we can omit "also" to emphasize the first part of the construction.



In D, we can use above rule and it should be fine.


- Brajesh


Hi Brajesh,
option D is missing the "not only" part.. how can we use the "but also" part? is'nt option E more concise?

Cheers,
Circkit
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3401
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 07:23
OA is B...
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 48
Schools: Olin
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: SC--tough one [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 07:39
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses andfurniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States createfarmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers elatively inexpensivehouses and furniture, but it also

Not only, match perfectly with but also....and it correctly says that cleaning of forest provided the houses and furniture

B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States createfarmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relativelyinexpensive houses and furniture, but also
This one says that farmland provided the furniture and Houses

C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland(especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive housesand furniture, but also
Not only ..is missing

D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive housesand furniture, but it also
Not only ..is missing

E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland(especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses andfurniture, but it

but also is missing
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 321
Location: Orange County, CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 08:33
'Doh!

I thought the "also" was included in the given sentence but it was not.

So A is incorrect b/c "not only...but IT also..." where B strictly follows the "not only...but also" rule?

Why is A incorrect?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 385
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2007, 08:42
Actually all the choices have issues. The it in A can refer to the farmland but the seems to mean that "it" is referring to the process of clearing which is wrong. I think there is a typo in one of the choices. I think E is missing is the also. If there isnt any then it might as well live with A.
  [#permalink] 24 Aug 2007, 08:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the daryayurlova 12 27 Jan 2011, 14:34
10 Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the hasham222 13 20 Jul 2009, 02:40
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the KC 14 23 Oct 2006, 12:54
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the gamjatang 10 15 Dec 2005, 23:11
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the okdongdong 8 03 Aug 2005, 06:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.