Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 21:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 560
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 2

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the [#permalink] New post 21 May 2008, 05:18
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and
furniture, but it also
caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create
farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive
houses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create
farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively
inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses
and furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses
and furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland
(especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and
furniture, but it
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 21 May 2008, 06:50
E .. coz it uses the right tense and the right idiom
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 158
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 21 May 2008, 14:44
I think D has the best verb tense and parallelism.
It is also not necessary for this sentence to use "not only".

I choose D.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 328
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 21 May 2008, 22:15
I went for B. Could spot only one error- use of "it". In my opinion the use was not required and created confusing antecedent. Please correct if my observation is wrong.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 709
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 22 May 2008, 00:58
systematic clearing and create have SV disagreement cannot go together thus it cannot be A,B.

Also But also does not necessarily require a Not also as a precedent, it is implicit in some statements like this thus I think D is the right one.
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Feb 2008
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 22 May 2008, 02:14
ooh..different views...can we have OA..???
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 297
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 22 May 2008, 04:34
A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.


D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.


B. 'which' changes the meaning now it is the 'farmland' not the 'systematic cleaning' that gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture. But then B does not use 'it' to confuse the matter.

E. Needs 'also' to make sense of 'Not only' used earlier.

Now, between A and D. Both I like though not the use of 'it' in them. I will pick D just because it is let verbose!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 297
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 22 May 2008, 04:38
prasannar wrote:
systematic clearing and create have SV disagreement cannot go together thus it cannot be A,B.

Also But also does not necessarily require a Not also as a precedent, it is implicit in some statements like this thus I think D is the right one.


there is a 'did' in A that takes care of the past tense so we are fine with using 'create'!
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 560
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 2

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 22 May 2008, 05:23
OA is D.

A has tense issues. It should be 'give' not 'gave'. (create & give)
B has altered intent situation as pointed by mbawaters
C & E can be easily eliminated for wrong usage of 'not only..but also'
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 297
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 22 May 2008, 05:31
saravalli wrote:
OA is D.

A has tense issues. It should be 'give' not 'gave'. (create & give)


Yeah thats something I wasn't sure and could not find much by google?

So is the following wrong?
I did not eat my vegetables but ate all the chicken.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 560
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 2

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 22 May 2008, 05:48
mbawaters wrote:
saravalli wrote:
OA is D.

A has tense issues. It should be 'give' not 'gave'. (create & give)


Yeah thats something I wasn't sure and could not find much by google?

So is the following wrong?
I did not eat my vegetables but ate all the chicken.


But your 'did' is in the past tense. So I think the sentence is right.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3403
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 2

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 22 May 2008, 05:59
i have seen OA as A, B and D..on this question..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 297
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 22 May 2008, 06:10
saravalli wrote:
mbawaters wrote:
saravalli wrote:
OA is D.

A has tense issues. It should be 'give' not 'gave'. (create & give)


Yeah thats something I wasn't sure and could not find much by google?

So is the following wrong?
I did not eat my vegetables but ate all the chicken.


But your 'did' is in the past tense. So I think the sentence is right.


I see what you are saying! though my impression was in a complex sentence 'did' only applies to the first verb.

Frank did go to Paris and saw (not see) Eiffel tower.
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests create X and gave (give) Y.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - forests [#permalink] New post 12 Nov 2008, 00:23
Quote:
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and
furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create
farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive
houses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create
farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively
inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses
and furniture, but also
D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland
(especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses
and furniture, but it also
E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland
(especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and
furniture, but it


"Not only...but also" is incorrect because the first two things listed (creating farmland and giving inexpensive houses & furniture) are positive things, while the phenomenon mentioned at the end of the sentence (caused erosion and deforested whole regions) is negative. You wouldn't say "Not only did studying help me get good grades and make my parents proud, but it also made me suicidal." When there are two contrasting events, you need to use a "but" to separate them. The "Not only...but also" construction only makes sense when you are describing events that have similar (i.e. good) consequences. Realizing this would have eliminated A, B, and E.

C is wrong because of the "but also". There is no main verb in the sentence. Has to be wrong.

D has a main verb and appropriately illustrates the contrast between the positive and negative consequences of clearing the forests.
Re: SC - forests   [#permalink] 12 Nov 2008, 00:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the johnycute 6 21 Jun 2007, 05:40
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the Allen760 14 23 Dec 2006, 08:51
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the KC 14 23 Oct 2006, 12:54
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the gamjatang 10 15 Dec 2005, 23:11
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the okdongdong 8 03 Aug 2005, 06:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.