Nuclear reactors are sometimes built in geologically quiet : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 13:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Nuclear reactors are sometimes built in geologically quiet

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1218
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 606 [0], given: 0

Nuclear reactors are sometimes built in geologically quiet [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2005, 03:51
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Nuclear reactors are sometimes built in â€œgeologically quietâ€
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 851
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2005, 03:58
Am going low on CRs...will pick B on this
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2005, 05:01
I was debating between (C) and (E).

I think it is (C)
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Milton Keynes UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2005, 15:15
I would go for option E.

Conclusion:
Nuclear reactors least likely to be struck by an earthquake are ones located near a fault that has produced an earthquake within living memory

Based on:
No minor fault in a geologically quiet region produces an earthquake more often than once in any given 100,000-year period.

Therefore if an earthquake has occured recently near a fault, then the possbility of that re-occuring at the very same fault is after a lapse of 100,000 years, and hence its safe to have a nuclear reactor built in that area.
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1218
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 606 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2005, 21:59
any explicit explanation?

THX

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 261
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2005, 22:10
I think E is already stated in passage as a premise. it should be C.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 851
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2005, 22:42
I don't get how C can be it...the denial test won't work either!!...
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Milton Keynes UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2005, 04:43
Chunjuwu,

Could you please post the OA ?

Cheers,
VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1488
Location: Germany
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 327 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2005, 08:05
i think it is E)

C) should be out because in the conclusion the author refers to "such a region". in his opinion the region has at least one minor fault. so it is stated as a fact.
Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 673
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2005, 08:45
[quote="chunjuwu"]Nuclear reactors are sometimes built in â€œgeologically quietâ€
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Sep 2004
Posts: 369
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2005, 23:27
I think the Answer should be E.
Though I don't understand how can E be the answer but the POE works the best here for me as ALL other choices are irrelavant.

Saurabh Malpani
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 356 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2005, 00:03
Premises:
1) Nuclear reactors are sometimes built in geologically quiet regions
2) Geologically quiet regions are distant from plate boundaries and contain only minor faults
3) No minor fault in a geologically quiet region produces an earthquake more often than once in any given 100,000 yr period

Conclusion:
4) Of all potential nuclear reactor sites in a geologically quiet region, those that are least likely to be struck by an earthquake are ones located near a fault that has produced an earthquake within living memory

We need an assumption to suggests why the nuclear plant is least likely to be struck by an earthquake if located near a fault.

(A) Geologically quiet regions are the least dangerous regions in which to build nuclear reactors.
- Out. Does not hold up the conclusion.

(B) For any potential nuclear reactor site the likelihood of being struck by an earthquake is the primary determinant of site safety.
- Does not suggest why siting a nuclear plant near a minor fault is safe

(C) In a geologically quiet region every potential nuclear reactor site is near at least one minor fault.
- Does not suggest why it's safe to do so.

(D) Nuclear reactors that are located in geologically quiet regions are built to withstand at least one but not necessarily more than one earthquake of minor to moderate force.
- out of scope

(E) Earthquake faults in geologically quiet regions produce earthquakes at least once in 100,000 years.
- if in living memory there is has been 1 earthquake, then it will be a very long time before the next one comes along. So the conclusion holds.

E it is.
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2243
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 324 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2005, 09:10
I'll join anandnk to choose (C) for this one.
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1218
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 606 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2005, 03:58
sorry for late.

OA is C

I got the question finally. I try my best to explain, any correctness will be appreciated. Maybe HongHu can correct me. Thanks

The conclusion: the nuclear reactor sites near a fault that has produced an earthquake within living memory( meaning 100000 years) will be the least likely to struck by an earthquake.

But if some nuclear reactor sites are not near a fault, then there could be no earthquake in these sites. In other words, some nuclear reactor sites will be less likely to struck by an earthquake than the nuclear reactor sites the author said. So, in order to prevent the conclusion from weakening, we must assume all nuclear reactor sites are near fault.

Choice E has been stated in the question,... are ones located near a fault that has produced an earthquake within living memory......

So, it cannot be the assumption.

Any ideas?
29 Mar 2005, 03:58
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Although the geological record contains some hints 6 23 Dec 2016, 01:42
33 Nuclear reactors are sometimes built in geologically quiet 10 05 Feb 2013, 20:19
1 Although the geological record contains some hints of major 16 14 Mar 2011, 08:31
1 CR-Nuclear Power in France 4 19 Feb 2009, 07:07
It is repeatedly claimed that the dumping of nuclear waste 8 25 Jun 2008, 10:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by