Darden is releasing R3 decisions: Check your profile status | EXPECTING SOON - Stanford and Fuqua | Join Chat Room for Live Updates

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Number properties question [#permalink]
06 Apr 2011, 15:18

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:58) correct
50% (04:15) wrong based on 2 sessions

Hi,

Question is as follows:

If n is a positive integer and n^2 is divisible by 96, then the largest positive integer that must divide n is...?

My method was to prime factorize 96 then remove any matching factors and multiply these together to get the answer (24) - not sure about the theory behind it though and if anyone has any rules or theories about factors of x compared to factors of x^2 and x^3 etc. that would be very interesting

Re: Number properties question [#permalink]
06 Apr 2011, 15:46

Lets find the minimum value of n for n^2 to be divisible by 96 =>96 = 2^5 x 3 =>n^2 should have 2^5 x 3 => so, minimum value of integer n can be 2^3 x 3 (2^3 x 3)^2/96 = 6 I guess, the largest integer that divides n is the number itself i.e. 2^3 x 3 or 24 _________________

Re: Number properties question [#permalink]
06 Apr 2011, 17:23

yes, is there a rule? what if it was n^3 or n^4 - I can see that you can work through the question since it's quite straight forward but i would have no idea how to do this if the numbers were a lot more complex

Re: Number properties question [#permalink]
06 Apr 2011, 18:07

subhashghosh wrote:

I would also like to know this in a detailed manner.

For example - @ravsg, could you please explain why this is true - "so, minimum value of integer n can be 2^3 x 3"

Why not 2^2 * 3, or 2 * 3, I'm a bit lost because we're talking about "minimum value", right ?

Lets assume n to be 2^2 * 3 i.e. 12 Now n^2 => 12^2/96 => 144/96 remainder is 48. for n to be divisible by 96, remainder should be zero.

same method can prove that 2*3 doesn't satisfy. On the contrary, the question can be why not a large value like 2^10*3^2 - this part would depend on the answer choices listed, without list of ans choices, we can solve for a min value. _________________

Re: Number properties question [#permalink]
06 Apr 2011, 18:22

Alternate method, just thought of it - may not be the best way.

=>n^2 / 96 => n^2 / (2^5 x 3^1) => n^2 x 2^(-5) x 3 ^ (-1) ---- call it eq A

For the above to be divisible (leave remainder=zero), there should be no negative powers left after addition/subtraction of powers

1) Let n be 2^2 x 3 n^2 = (2^2 x 3)^2 => 2^4 x 3^2 Substituting above in eq A for n^2 =>2^4 x 3^2 x 2^(-5) x 3 ^ (-1) =>2^(4 - 5) x 3^(2 - 1) => 2^(-1) x 3^1 or 3/2 so the assumed value of n is incorrect, we can increase the number of 2's in n so that denominator is 1

Another method that crossed my mind, may look silly though - Taking log of n^2 / (2^5 x 3^1), the result should be >=0 =>2log(n) - 5log2 - log3 substituting n with (2^3 x 3)^2 i.e. 2^6 x 3^2 =>6log2 + 2log3 - 5log2 - log3 => log2 + log3 or log (2 x 3) removing log => 6 positive value indicates it is

For reference, log of a^b = b log a log of a x b = log a + log b log of a/b = log a - log b _________________

Re: Number properties question [#permalink]
07 Apr 2011, 00:52

chloeholding wrote:

Hi,

Question is as follows:

If n is a positive integer and n^2 is divisible by 96, then the largest positive integer that must divide n is...?

My method was to prime factorize 96 then remove any matching factors and multiply these together to get the answer (24) - not sure about the theory behind it though and if anyone has any rules or theories about factors of x compared to factors of x^2 and x^3 etc. that would be very interesting

Thanks

\(n^2\) is divisible by \(96\) i.e. \(2^5*3\)

What is minimum value for \(n^2\) i.e. which is the smallest number must be multiplied by \(2^5*3\) to make it a perfect square?

We know the powers of all prime numbers must be even in a perfect square. \(2^5\) if multiplied by \(2\) will result in even power of 2 i.e. \(2^6\) \(3^1\) if multiplied by \(3\) will result in even power of 3 i.e. \(3^2\)

Thus, we multiplied \(2^5*3\) by \(2*3\). n^2 becomes \(2^6*3^2\), which a square of \(2^3*3\)

\((2^3*3)^2=2^6*3^2\)

Thus, we have our minimum value for n. \(2^3*3=24\)

The largest integer that divides 24 is 24 itself. Smaller integers would be 2,12,4,6,1. Ans: 24(Supposedly)

Now, to add a little more to the confusion.

It is possible that \(n^2=((2^3*3)^2)^2 \hspace{} OR \hspace{2} ((2^3*3)^{25})^2\) Making \(n=(2^3*3)^2 \hspace{} OR \hspace{2} (2^3*3)^{25} \hspace{2}\) Eventually making largest integer that could divide \(n=(2^3*3)^2 OR \hspace{2} (2^3*3)^{25}\)

We don't know the exact value of \(n\). Thus, we need to consider it as minimum possible because the question asks the largest positive integer that MUST divide n.

Imagine we answered it as \((2^3*3)^{25}\) but in reality, \(n=(2^3*3)\), our answer would be wrong because \((2^3*3)^{25}\) doesn't divide \((2^3*3)\).

At the same time, if we answered it as \((2^3*3)\), it will divide "n", alright. But, even here we can't be too sure whether this is indeed the LARGEST integer that is dividing "n". What if \(n=(2^3*3)^{25}\).

I would have liked the question if it read: "If n is a positive integer and n^2 is the smallest integer divisible by 96, then the largest positive integer that must divide n will be? _________________

Re: Number properties question [#permalink]
07 Apr 2011, 19:19

Expert's post

subhashghosh wrote:

I would also like to know this in a detailed manner.

For example - @ravsg, could you please explain why this is true - "so, minimum value of integer n can be 2^3 x 3"

Why not 2^2 * 3, or 2 * 3, I'm a bit lost because we're talking about "minimum value", right ?

@subhashghosh - As per your request, I am providing the explanation to this question though I think fluke has already done a good job above. I don't think there is much left to add.

Anyway, since \(n^2\) is a multiple of 96, \(n^2 = 96*k = 2^5 * 3 * k\) (k is a positive integer)

Notice that it is \(n^2\) i.e. square of a positive integer so powers of all prime factors of \(n^2\) must be even. So k must be at least 2*3 so that \(n^2\) is at least \(2^6 * 3^2\) (note that powers of 2 and 3 have become even now. Also, this is the smallest value of \(n^2. If k > 2*3, n^2\) would be greater)

Since \(n^2\) is at least \(2^6 * 3^2\), \(n\) is at least \(2^3 * 3\). So largest number that must divide n is 24. Note that a greater number could divide n (depending on the value of k) _________________

Re: Number properties question [#permalink]
08 Apr 2011, 01:01

chloeholding wrote:

Hi Fluke,

Thanks a lot for your explanation, really helped. However, how did you find the ^25 as the other possible value of n^2?

Thanks

\(n^2\) can't be \((2^3*3)^{25}\)

\(n^2\) should be any even power of \((2^3*3)\), say \((2^3*3)^{2k}\) where k is a positive integer. Because, \(n^2\) is a perfect square and a perfect square is always an even power of an integer.

\(2^2=4\) \(3^2=9\) \((2^2)^2=16\) \((3^2)^2=81\)

Thus, \(n^2\) can be \(((2^3*3)^{25})^2\). If \(n^2=((2^3*3)^{25})^2\), then \(n=\sqrt{((2^3*3)^{25})^2}=(2^3*3)^{25}\)

Now, Question says; \(n^2\) is divisible by 96. \(n=(2^3*3)^{25}\) \(n^2=((2^3*3)^{25})^2\). \(((2^3*3)^{25})^2\) is divisible by 96 because \((2^3*3)^{2}\) is divisible by 96.

What will be the largest integer that will divide "n". The number itself, right. Largest integer\(=n=(2^3*3)^{25}\)

Well, this answer is not correct though because the question assumes the smallest value for \(n^2=(2^3*3)^2\), which makes the largest \(n=2^3*3\) I don't really understand, why so?

But, hey!!! This question is from GMATPrep and it is a general belief that GMATPrep questions are always logically correct. You may as well ignore all this gibberish. _________________

Re: Number properties question [#permalink]
08 Apr 2011, 03:27

Expert's post

fluke wrote:

Well, this answer is not correct though because the question assumes the smallest value for \(n^2=(2^3*3)^2\), which makes the largest \(n=2^3*3\) I don't really understand, why so?

But, hey!!! This question is from GMATPrep and it is a general belief that GMATPrep questions are always logically correct. You may as well ignore all this gibberish.

Focus on the difference between 'must' and 'can'

Say, if I tell you that a = 20k (k is a positive integer) My question is 'Which is the largest number by which 'a' must be divisible?' From this information, you can say that 'a' must be divisible by 20. It could be divisible by 40, 80, 120, 808080 etc _________________

Type of Visa: You will be applying for a Non-Immigrant F-1 (Student) US Visa. Applying for a Visa: Create an account on: https://cgifederal.secure.force.com/?language=Englishcountry=India Complete...

I started running back in 2005. I finally conquered what seemed impossible. Not sure when I would be able to do full marathon, but this will do for now...