Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

well, my problem is with (2)Each house on Kermit Lane that has a front porch does not have a front yard. not knowing that we have only front porch and only front yard, and knowing only (1) we can assume that there are some houses with both front porches and front yards.

that is why I thought that the answer is C _________________

Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true

I am still on all gmat forums. msg me if you want to ask me smth

1 can be rephrased as- Every house has a back yard. So there are 40 houses in total.

20 = front porches 20 = front yards 40 = back yards

According to 2, if a house has a front porch, then it does not have a front yard. So the first two categories, above, don't overlap. There can be at least 40 houses (20 with front porches and 20 with front yards - and these could overlap completely with the 40 that have backyards to give 40 houses total) There could be 80 houses: 20 with only front porches, 20 more with only front yards, and 40 more with only back yards.

Re: Of all the houses on Kermit Lane, 20 have front porches, 20 [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Oct 2013, 06:19

I chose D

St (1) No house is without a backyard ----> so we know that every house must have a backyard. so the number of houses must equal 40. Sufficient

St (2) Each house that has a front porch CAN NOT have a front yard. This means that the 20 houses with front porches are separate and distinct from the other 20 houses that have front yards. there is no overlap here. so total houses= 20 front porches + 20 front yards = 40. Sufficient

Note that there are no houses that have neither. SO it is one big set of 40 houses that encompass 2 distinct sets of 20 front porches and 20 front yards

Both statements are sufficient D _________________

Re: Of all the houses on Kermit Lane, 20 have front porches, 20 [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Oct 2013, 08:03

2

This post received KUDOS

SaraLotfy wrote:

I chose D

St (1) No house is without a backyard ----> so we know that every house must have a backyard. so the number of houses must equal 40. Sufficient

St (2) Each house that has a front porch CAN NOT have a front yard. This means that the 20 houses with front porches are separate and distinct from the other 20 houses that have front yards. there is no overlap here. so total houses= 20 front porches + 20 front yards = 40. Sufficient

Note that there are no houses that have neither. SO it is one big set of 40 houses that encompass 2 distinct sets of 20 front porches and 20 front yards

Both statements are sufficient D

I don't think it is D. Since 2nd statement gives you information that there are atleast 40 houses on the lane. But doesn't give you any information about the houses that have backyards.

The situation might be that 20 have front porches, 20 have front yards and all of these 40 houses have backyards. But it can also be that 20 have front porches, 20 have front yards and none of these 40 houses have backyards. Therefore in that case there will be 80 houses in total..

Hence you get 2 different situations with the statement and hence answer will only be A.

I don't understand any of the explanations above. How are we supposed to know which categories overlap and which do not?

Thanks Cheers! J

I'm betting on you B1

Of all the houses on Kermit Lane, 20 have front porches, 20 have front yards, and 40 have back yards. How many houses are on Kermit Lane?

(1) No house on Kermit Lane is without a back yard. This implies that ALL house on Kermit Lane are with a back yard. Since we know that there are 40 houses with a back yard, then there must be 40 houses on the street. Sufficient.

(2) Each house on Kermit Lane that has a front porch does not have a front yard. This implies that houses with a front porch (20) and the houses with a front yard (20) does not overlap. Thus there must be at least 20 + 20 = 40 houses (20 with a front porch and a back yard + 20 with a front yard and a back yard) and at most 20 + 20 + 40 = 80 houses (in case the houses with a back yard does not overlap with other categories). Not sufficient.

Re: Of all the houses on Kermit Lane, 20 have front porches, 20 [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jul 2014, 04:05

Bunuel wrote:

jlgdr wrote:

I don't understand any of the explanations above. How are we supposed to know which categories overlap and which do not?

Thanks Cheers! J

I'm betting on you B1

Of all the houses on Kermit Lane, 20 have front porches, 20 have front yards, and 40 have back yards. How many houses are on Kermit Lane?

(1) No house on Kermit Lane is without a back yard. This implies that ALL house on Kermit Lane are with a back yard. Since we know that there are 40 houses with a back yard, then there must be 40 houses on the street. Sufficient.

(2) Each house on Kermit Lane that has a front porch does not have a front yard. This implies that houses with a front porch (20) and the houses with a front yard (20) does not overlap. Thus there must be at least 20 + 20 = 40 houses (20 with a front porch and a back yard + 20 with a front yard and a back yard) and at most 20 + 20 + 40 = 80 houses (in case the houses with a back yard does not overlap with other categories). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

I don't understand A Granted the total no is 40, but the no of houses can still overlap Say there are 16 houses with front porches and 19 with front yards, implying that there are 5 that have both in common. Thus the total no of houses could be 35 or some other variation. What am i missing here?

I don't understand any of the explanations above. How are we supposed to know which categories overlap and which do not?

Thanks Cheers! J

I'm betting on you B1

Of all the houses on Kermit Lane, 20 have front porches, 20 have front yards, and 40 have back yards. How many houses are on Kermit Lane?

(1) No house on Kermit Lane is without a back yard. This implies that ALL house on Kermit Lane are with a back yard. Since we know that there are 40 houses with a back yard, then there must be 40 houses on the street. Sufficient.

(2) Each house on Kermit Lane that has a front porch does not have a front yard. This implies that houses with a front porch (20) and the houses with a front yard (20) does not overlap. Thus there must be at least 20 + 20 = 40 houses (20 with a front porch and a back yard + 20 with a front yard and a back yard) and at most 20 + 20 + 40 = 80 houses (in case the houses with a back yard does not overlap with other categories). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

I don't understand A Granted the total no is 40, but the no of houses can still overlap Say there are 16 houses with front porches and 19 with front yards, implying that there are 5 that have both in common. Thus the total no of houses could be 35 or some other variation. What am i missing here?

The total number of houses cannot be 35 or any other number but 40. How can it be 35 if we know that there are 40 houses with a back yard?

We are given that there are 40 houses with a back yards. From (1) we can deduce that ALL houses are with a back yard (there are no house without it). If ALL houses are with a back yard and there are total of 40 houses with a back yard, there must be total of 40 houses.

Re: Of all the houses on Kermit Lane, 20 have front porches, 20 [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Aug 2014, 16:56

How come we are ignoring the option of a house not having front porch, front yard or back yard?...I agree its uncommon in US but not uncommon in my home country to not have all 3

How come we are ignoring the option of a house not having front porch, front yard or back yard?...I agree its uncommon in US but not uncommon in my home country to not have all 3

Re: Of all the houses on Kermit Lane, 20 have front porches, 20 [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Aug 2015, 08:22

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

This is the kickoff for my 2016-2017 application season. After a summer of introspect and debate I have decided to relaunch my b-school application journey. Why would anyone want...

Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...

“Oh! Looks like your passport expires soon” – these were the first words at the airport in London I remember last Friday. Shocked that I might not be...