Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 01:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2011, 06:16
Excellent question.

I piced D at first, but then I realized that:

Even fully informed the RISKS of the surgery before, the 1/4 patients DIDN'T know that, to the surgeons who were aware of the situation, they are going to practice objects. So these patients would accept the risks, thinking that they have the opportunity to survive, only to be practiced on.

So D doesn't undermine the arguement.

Only when even the surgeons couldn't predict the result before the operation, they are out of hook.

Hope my explanation helps
Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 121
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2011, 18:34
Answer choice E as it is the only option which gives the benefit of doubt to the doctors for going ahead with the surgery!

If we look at option D, it gives a justification from the patient's side to take the surgery knowing the risks associated with the surgery which henceforth fails to undermine the argument of doctor's performing the surgery for just monetary benefits...
Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 898
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 1044 [0], given: 543

Re: Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2013, 21:26
Can someone explain D and E. They are the real contenders.
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1420
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 175

Kudos [?]: 1333 [0], given: 62

Re: Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2013, 22:38
Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass surgery—a procedure widely prescribed for people with heart disease—only 75 percent benefited from the surgery. Thus it appears that for one in four such patients, the doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery, with its attendant risks and expense, were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A. Many of the patients who receive coronary bypass surgery are less than 55 years old
.
B. Possible benefits of coronary bypass surgery include both relief from troubling symptoms and prolongation of life.

C. Most of the patients in the survey decided to undergo coronary bypass surgery because they were advised that the surgery would reduce their risk of future heart attacks.

D. The patients over 65 years old who did not benefit from the coronary bypass surgery were as fully informed as those who did benefit from the surgery as to the risks of the surgery prior to undergoing it.

E. The patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery but who did not benefit from it were medically indistinguishable, prior to their surgery, from the patients who did benefit.

Find the conclusion:
The doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.

Choice E states that the medical patients were MEDICALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE from one another. Since this is the case, then no doctor could have placed a bet on a certain patient in order to enhance his/her surgery skills. E nails the conclusion.

On the other hand, D states that patients who got benefit from the surgery were as equally informed as the patients who didn't get benefit. Okay. Let us agree, but does it destroys the conclusion. No, not at all.

It is a straight E.
Regards,
_________________
Intern
Joined: 14 May 2011
Posts: 10
Location: US
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2013, 11:59
Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass surgery—a procedure widely prescribed for people with heart disease—only 75 percent benefited from the surgery. Thus it appears that for one in four such patients, the doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery, with its attendant risks and expense, were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

My approach :
Clearly a "Weakener" question (undermines the argument). The Argument - states a fact (success rate of surgery) and a conclusion ("Thus") drawn that Doctors were more interested in X than Y (Please see the main subject and verb of conclusion are - 'Doctors' and 'were interetsed'. ~Patients and ~Advise are just setting the context of the situation that is in question)

To undermine - A new fact would undermine this argument if it can make the conclusion less beleivable. A fact like that "doctors did not sell the surgery to patients purposefully / Doctors meant well when they advised but surgery just did not go as planned"

It is like an analogy - When you dont know whats wrong with your car and take it to workshop for check up. And the mechanic (who knows that it is just a short fuse in a wire) sells / advises you to change the engine instead for vested interests. Here he did it purposefully to make profits even though he HAD DISTINGUISHED BEFOREHAND that the car just needs a wire replaced.

Therefore choosing between popular choces D and E
D- Disclosure of risks would not make a difference to either Group 1 (1/4) or Group 2 (3/4) when it comes to Doctor's advise to go for surgery. Therefore cant be a Weakener.

E- Whether the Group1 (1/4) was medically DISTINGUISHABLE from Group 2 (3/4) PRIOR TO SURGERY - will definitely make one question Doctor's motives and therefore is a weakener.

----------------------------------------
Press +Kudos if you like what you see
_________________

-------------------------------------------------
Press +Kudos if you like what you see

Re: Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass   [#permalink] 01 Dec 2013, 11:59

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
11 Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass 4 26 Jul 2012, 09:22
14 Cardiologist: Coronary bypass surgery is commonly performed 13 11 Mar 2011, 08:26
15 International Policy Adviser: People over the age of 65 are 14 07 Aug 2010, 22:37
3 Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass 35 07 Aug 2009, 05:33
9 Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass 16 30 Jun 2007, 09:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by