Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Question stem says that 2/3 of 60 are pigs or cows. That means 40 animals are pigs or cows. So all we need to have sufficiency is either number of pigs or number of cows.

1) Farm has more than 2 cows for 1 pig (at least 26.6 animals of the 40 are cows). This just tells us that the farm has at least 27 pigs and that the max number of cows is 13. For example the farm could have 30 pigs and 10 cows. Not a definitive number. Insufficient.

2) Farm has more than 12 pigs. Again not enough info. Insuff

1+2) Statements together tell us: 12 < number of pigs is <=13 Which means number pigs = 13 Number of cows = 27.

Of the 60 animals on a certain farm, 2/3 are either cows or [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Oct 2009, 12:28

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

ngoctraiden1905 wrote:

From your ans I think the stem means 2/3 of 60 animals are both pigs and cows, not either pigs or cows. I think there is some problem with stem here?

How it's possible for an animal to be BOTH a pig and a cow? 2/3 of 60 animals are either pigs or cows. So there are total of 40 cows and pigs. Yansta8's solution is correct.

Question stem says that 2/3 of 60 are pigs or cows. That means 40 animals are pigs or cows. So all we need to have sufficiency is either number of pigs or number of cows.

1) Farm has more than 2 cows for 1 pig (at least 26.6 animals of the 40 are cows). This just tells us that the farm has at least 27 pigs and that the max number of cows is 13. For example the farm could have 30 pigs and 10 cows. Not a definitive number. Insufficient.

2) Farm has more than 12 pigs. Again not enough info. Insuff

1+2) Statements together tell us: 12 < number of pigs is <=13 Which means number pigs = 13 Number of cows = 27.

ANSWER = C.

I do agree with 'yangsta8' that the answer is 'C' but (if I am NOT wrong), Stmnt#1 says the number of Cows are more than twice than the pigs. Thus, the cows could be 27 and Pigs could be 13; and For example, the farm could have 30 cows and 10 pigs. ------------------------------- Hi Bunuel and Yangsta8 - Please correct me if I am wrong (which is very much possible)!

Of the 60 animals on a certain farm, 2/3 are either cows or [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Oct 2009, 18:50

2

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

7

This post was BOOKMARKED

Syed wrote:

yangsta8 wrote:

Of the 60 animals on a certain farm, 2/3 are either pigs or cows. How many of the animals are cows?

(1) The farm has more than twice as many cows as pigs

(2) The farm has more than 12 pigs

Question stem says that 2/3 of 60 are pigs or cows. That means 40 animals are pigs or cows. So all we need to have sufficiency is either number of pigs or number of cows.

1) Farm has more than 2 cows for 1 pig (at least 26.6 animals of the 40 are cows). This just tells us that the farm has at least 27 pigs and that the max number of cows is 13. For example the farm could have 30 pigs and 10 cows. Not a definitive number. Insufficient.

2) Farm has more than 12 pigs. Again not enough info. Insuff

1+2) Statements together tell us: 12 < number of pigs is <=13 Which means number pigs = 13 Number of cows = 27.

ANSWER = C.

I do agree with 'yangsta8' that the answer is 'C' but (if I am NOT wrong), Stmnt#1 says the number of Cows are more than twice than the pigs. Thus, the cows could be 27 and Pigs could be 13; and For example, the farm could have 30 cows and 10 pigs. ------------------------------- Hi Bunuel and Yangsta8 - Please correct me if I am wrong (which is very much possible)!

c+p=40

(1) c>2p --> min # of cows is 27 and max # pigs is 13, so there can be any combination not violating this and totaling 40. Not sufficient (2) p>12 Not sufficient

(1)+(2) p>12 but max of p is 13, hence p=13 --> c=27

You are right there can be 27 cows (min) and 13 pigs (max) or 30 cows and 10 pigs.

Think there was simple typo from yangsta8. _________________

The key word in statement 1 is "more" than twice as many. If "more" wasn't there, you would be right. From the stem we know that #pigs + #cows = 40

Statement 1: If you had 1 pig and 39 cows, you have more than twice as many cows as pigs (a lot more than twice the number actually). If you had 2 pigs and 38 cows, the statement still holds true. Therefore, insufficient by itself.

Statement 2: If you had 13 pigs and 27 cows, the statement holds true. If you had 14 pigs and 26 cows, the statement still holds true. Therefore, insufficient by itself.

Together: Start with the first posible option according to statement 2: 13 pigs and 27 cows works for both statements. The next option (14 pigs and 26 cows) violates statement 1 because you don't have more than twice as many cows as pigs. Every option after this will have the same problem. Therefore you only have one option - sufficient to determine the answer. C.

2/3 of 60 animals are pigs or cows. so 40 of the animals are pigs or cows. We are not told what the rest are. The question is how many of the animals are cows?

Statement one says there are more than twice as many cows as pigs we would write 2P < C. This is not sufficient to give the answer.

Statement two says the farm has 12 pigs. Since we know that there are 40 cows and pigs we can simply subtract the 12 from the total pigs and cows and get that there are 28 cows. Of course we don't have to complete the math to say that number two is sufficient.

I like this question. If you read it too fast (as I often do), it’s super confusing.

IMO the answer has to be C.

From the stem, we know that there are 40 cows and pigs, or C+P=40.

St 1: Tells us that the most pigs we can have is 13, or P<13. Any more than that, then their won’t be twice as many cows. But there could be less than 13 pigs. Insuf.

St 2: Now tells us there has to be at least 13 pigs, or P>12 Alone this is not very helpful, but combined with one, we can get the answer.

Guys I don't know how long this post has been here however I thought I would add my 2 cents and see if what I feel should be the answer.

Question says something either a cow or a pig form the ratio of 2/3. I don't feel 60 number is of much significance since this is DS.

1) says the mix is 1 to 2. So if by simple math I find what's remaining out of 2/3 the ratio comes out to be 1/3. At this moment for me the information in the statement 1 becomes helpful.

Since 2wice of 1/3 is 2/3 and we know that 2wice as many cows hence this information is sufficient.

Posted from my mobile device _________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ros. Nice Post + Some help + Lucid solution = Kudos

The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do | Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people. -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Guys I don't know how long this post has been here however I thought I would add my 2 cents and see if what I feel should be the answer.

Question says something either a cow or a pig form the ratio of 2/3. I don't feel 60 number is of much significance since this is DS.

1) says the mix is 1 to 2. So if by simple math I find what's remaining out of 2/3 the ratio comes out to be 1/3. At this moment for me the information in the statement 1 becomes helpful.

Since 2wice of 1/3 is 2/3 and we know that 2wice as many cows hence this information is sufficient.

Posted from my mobile device

Of the 60 animals on a certain farm, 2/3 are either pigs or cows. How many of the animals are cows?

(1) The farm has more than twice as many cows as it has pigs --> so we have is \(c>2p\) and not \(c=2p\) --> as \(c+p=40\) (p=40-c and c=40-p) --> \(40-p>2p\), \(13.3>p\), \(p_{max}=13\) and \(c_{min}=27\). Many combinations are possible: (27,13), (28, 12), ... Not sufficient.

(2) \(p>12\). Not sufficient

(1)+(2) \(p>12\) but \(p_{max}=13\), hence \(p=13\) --> \(c=27\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

One more thing: if the ratio indeed were \(c=2p\), then the question would be flawed as solving \(c=2p\) and \(c+p=40\) gives \(p=13.3\), but # of pigs can not be a fraction it MUST be an integer. _________________

Of the 60 animals on a certain farm, 2/3 are either pigs or cows. How many of the animals are cows ? (1) The farm has more than twice as many cows as it has pigs. (2) The farm has more than 12 pigs

1. so we have either 40 cows OR pigs. so 1 is saying C> 2P so we could have P =10 and C=30 which is twice as P. OR we could have P =14 and C = 26 which is more. notice C changes! INSUFF

2. so we know there are more than 12 pigs... which tells us nothing about cows so INSUFF

C. ok. so we have C > 2*12 = C>24 since we know P =12 we can figure out cows is 28 _________________

i think the confusion for a few people (me included!) was the statement: "2/3 are either pigs or cows"

i incorrectly started the problem by interpreting the above as either one of two cases are possible: 1) 40 pigs or 2) 40 cows

after working the problem, i realized that there's no way this problem is so easy. then i managed to work out that the above simply meant: "40 = p + c"

lol! too much verbal review, i guess, and neglecting quant. _________________

Insufficient. We are told there are more than twice as many cows as there are pigs, but we are given no indication as to how many more than twice as many.

(2): P > 12 Insufficient. We have no idea how many pigs or cows there are, just that there are at least 13 pigs.

(1) & (2)

Sufficient. Given P > 12 and C > 2P, we need to have at least 26 cows to satisfy statement 2. Since 13 + 26 = 39, it is not possible to have more than 13 pigs on the farm and still have C + P < 41.

Last edited by LJ on 18 Sep 2010, 15:25, edited 1 time in total.

From your ans I think the stem means 2/3 of 60 animals are both pigs and cows, not either pigs or cows. I think there is some problem with stem here?

How it's possible for animals to be BOTH pigs and cows. 2/3 of 60 animals are either pigs or cows. So there are total of 40 cows and pigs. Yansta8's solution is correct.

C it is.

I guess that ngoctraiden thought 2/3 of 60 = 40 animals are all pigs or 40animals are all cows. btw, i've learnt an intersting difference in languages between English and some other languages. This stem should be translated as people here already said: 40 animals include pigs and cows: p+c = 40 _________________

Consider giving me kudos if you find my explanations helpful so i can learn how to express ideas to people more understandable.

Excellent posts dLo saw your blog too..!! Man .. you have got some writing skills. And Just to make an argument = You had such an amazing resume ; i am glad...

So Much $$$ Business school costs a lot. This is obvious, whether you are a full-ride scholarship student or are paying fully out-of-pocket. Aside from the (constantly rising)...

They say you get better at doing something by doing it. then doing it again ... and again ... and again, and you keep doing it until one day you look...