Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Of the companies surveyed about the skills they required in [#permalink]
28 Nov 2010, 18:25

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

75% (02:08) correct
25% (01:38) wrong based on 67 sessions

Of the companies surveyed about the skills they required in prospective employees, 20 percent required both computer skills and writing skills. What percent of the companies surveyed required neither computer skills nor writing skills?

(1) Of those companies surveyed that required computer skills, half required writing skills. (2) 45 percent of the companies surveyed required writing skills but not computer skills.

With statement 1 you can't even know how many require computer skills and how many require writing skills. So there is no chane to find out the number which require neither of these skills.

With statement 2, we can't know the percentage which might be required to know the computer skills and as a result we can't know the percentage which requires neither.

But if we combine the statement 1 and statement2, we can find out the percentage of the employees which require neither of the skills.

With statement 1 you can't even know how many require computer skills and how many require writing skills. So there is no chane to find out the number which require neither of these skills. can't you determine the percentage of computer skills since half of the computer skills also required writing skills and we know the percentage that required both =20% so therefore percentage total that required computer skills was 40%?

With statement 2, we can't know the percentage which might be required to know the computer skills and as a result we can't know the percentage which requires neither.

But if we combine the statement 1 and statement2, we can find out the percentage of the employees which require neither of the skills.

Thus "C"

I used venn diagram for this and go a total of 85% that required both comp skills and writing skills or either or. so the percentage that required none is 15%.

Of the companies surveyed about the skills they required in prospective employees, 20 percent required both computer skills and writing skills. What percent of the companies surveyed required neither computer skills nor writing skills? (1) Of those companies surveyed that required computer skills, half required writing skills. (2) 45 percent of the companies surveyed required writing skills but not computer skills.

Thanks.

You can draw a Venn diagram or make a matrix to solve this question.

Note that statement (1) says that "of those companies surveyed that required computer skills, half required writing skills" --> if \(y\) required computer skills, then of those \(y\) who required computer skills, \(\frac{y}{2}\) also required writing skills (# of companies required computer and writing skills is \(\frac{y}{2}=20\)).

There you go: Stmnt 1: Of those who required computer skills, half required writing skills too. This means those 'half' are the ones that are common to both computer and writing. Then those who require only computer skills should also be 20%.

Attachment:

Ques2.jpg [ 9.68 KiB | Viewed 1916 times ]

Stmnt 2: 45% required only Writing skills.

Attachment:

Ques1.jpg [ 9.72 KiB | Viewed 1914 times ]

You cannot find x with either statement alone. But using both, you get x = 100% - (20 + 20 + 45)% = 15% _________________

Data Sufficiency Question [#permalink]
03 Apr 2012, 19:40

Of the companies surveyed about the skills they required in prospective employees, 20 percent required both computer skills and writing skills. What perfect of the companies surveyed required neither computer skills nor writing skills?

1) Of those companies surveyed that required computer skills, half required writing skills.

2) 45 percent of the companies surveyed required writing skills but not computer skills.

Can someone explain their thought process through this problem? I've tried reading and re-reading the GMAT explanation but I just can't seem to understand their process.

Re: Data Sufficiency Question [#permalink]
03 Apr 2012, 22:48

Expert's post

NvrEvrGvUp wrote:

Of the companies surveyed about the skills they required in prospective employees, 20 percent required both computer skills and writing skills. What perfect of the companies surveyed required neither computer skills nor writing skills?

1) Of those companies surveyed that required computer skills, half required writing skills.

2) 45 percent of the companies surveyed required writing skills but not computer skills.

Can someone explain their thought process through this problem? I've tried reading and re-reading the GMAT explanation but I just can't seem to understand their process.

Thanks, Rich

Merging similar topics. please ask if anything remains unclear. _________________

Re: Of the companies surveyed about the skills they required in [#permalink]
11 Apr 2012, 05:38

Expert's post

NvrEvrGvUp wrote:

I still can't wrap my head around the wording of statement one.

I understand statement two but I still don't understand how to use statement one.

Statement (1) says that "of those companies surveyed that required computer skills, half required writing skills" --> if \(y\) required computer skills, then of those \(y\) who required computer skills, \(\frac{y}{2}\) also required writing skills (# of companies required computer and writing skills is \(\frac{y}{2}=20\)).

My post above shows how it can be represented in double-set matrix and Karishma's post shows how it can be represented in Venn diagram.

So, can you please be more specific what part is confusing for you in this statement? _________________

Re: Of the companies surveyed about the skills they required in [#permalink]
23 Nov 2014, 22:31

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Hey, everyone. After a hectic orientation and a weeklong course, Managing Groups and Teams, I have finally settled into the core curriculum for Fall 1, and have thus found...

MBA Acceptance Rate by Country Most top American business schools brag about how internationally diverse they are. Although American business schools try to make sure they have students from...

For the past couple of weeks I’ve been winding down my affairs in New York by working on consulting projects, trying every exotic sandwich there is and then intensely...