Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 08:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 274
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 377 [2] , given: 22

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2009, 09:00
2
KUDOS
19
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (01:39) correct 55% (00:48) wrong based on 575 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets

* so gradual as to be indistinguishable
* so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
* so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
* gradual enough not to be distinguishable
* gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Zarrolou on 21 Jul 2013, 05:24, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 203
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2009, 09:30
No problm with A.

C - closer but looks wordy compared to A
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 282
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2009, 09:44
selvae wrote:
No problm with A.

C - closer but looks wordy compared to A

agree with A. C is also incorrect because of "they"
SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2492
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 734 [0], given: 19

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2009, 11:25
study wrote:
Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets

* so gradual as to be indistinguishable
* so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
* so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
* gradual enough not to be distinguishable
* gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them

Agree with A, which is idiomatic "so x as to be y" and meaningful.

No dispute for B, D and E.

C looks tempting but changes the meaning. "economic shifts" are neither able nor unable to be distinguished. They do not do that job rather they are indistinguishable for others i.e. people.
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 274
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2009, 11:29
Can someone explain the difference between the foll two

so ...as to
so ...that

when to/not to use the above. it's confusing.
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 554
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 424 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2009, 14:28
TIger....Can you explain it more? Thx
GMAT TIGER wrote:
study wrote:
Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets

* so gradual as to be indistinguishable
* so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
* so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
* gradual enough not to be distinguishable
* gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them

Agree with A, which is idiomatic "so x as to be y" and meaningful.

No dispute for B, D and E.

C looks tempting but changes the meaning. "economic shifts" are neither able nor unable to be distinguished. They do not do that job rather they are indistinguishable for others i.e. people.
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 877
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 361 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2009, 15:28
study wrote:
Can someone explain the difference between the foll two

so ...as to
so ...that

when to/not to use the above. it's confusing.

Here is how I understand it:

so X as to Y

so ... that...
What comes after "that" has to be a clause.

If anyone has got live examples, I'd be happy to discuss to my ability.
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 877
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 361 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2009, 15:31
Here is an example from 1000 SC (26)
26. A recording system was so secretly installed and operated in the Kennedy Oval Office that even Theodore C. Sorensen, the White House counsel, did not know it existed.
(A) A recording system was so secretly installed and operated in the Kennedy Oval Office that
(B) So secret was a recording system installation and operation in the Kennedy Oval Office
(C) It was so secret that a recording system was installed and operated in the Kennedy Oval Office
(D) A recording system that was so secretly installed and operated in the Kennedy Oval Office
(E) Installed and operated so secretly in the Kennedy Oval Office was a recording system that

OA: A
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 241
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2009, 17:53
so....as to ...
is this correct idiom? Can't find any examples on the internet.
I chose E. just use so that
botirvoy wrote:
study wrote:
Can someone explain the difference between the foll two

so ...as to
so ...that

when to/not to use the above. it's confusing.

Here is how I understand it:

so X as to Y

so ... that...
What comes after "that" has to be a clause.

If anyone has got live examples, I'd be happy to discuss to my ability.

_________________

-----------------------
tusharvk

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 470
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2009, 19:18
botirvoy wrote:
study wrote:
Can someone explain the difference between the foll two

so ...as to
so ...that

when to/not to use the above. it's confusing.

Here is how I understand it:

so X as to Y

so ... that...
What comes after "that" has to be a clause.

If anyone has got live examples, I'd be happy to discuss to my ability.

Botirvoy,
Which is the adverbial phrase in this sentence? I do not see any adverb.
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1569
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 250 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2009, 21:34
I will go for D.

I have read in OG11 that so X as to Y is not a correct idiom.
Also, so X that Y in option C changes the meaning.
E is wordy.
D seems to be the best.
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1286
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 410 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2009, 03:18
My choice is also D.
@Study, can u post the OA pls?
Intern
Joined: 06 May 2008
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2009, 15:43
This is a GMAT prep problem and OA is A.

I don't understand what's wrong with D.
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 314
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 318 [4] , given: 9

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2009, 00:50
4
KUDOS
DFG5150 wrote:
This is a GMAT prep problem and OA is A.

I don't understand what's wrong with D.

IMO
I think enough not to is not correct; the question should read "Often major economic shifts are not gradual enough to be ..."
There is a different in meaning between so ...as and enough to

X enough to Y is used when the emphasis is on Y. "So X as to Y" is used when the emphasis is on X

1. "I am tall enough to touch the ceiling" implies that the focus is on the fact of being able to touch the ceiling.
2." I am so tall as to be able to touch the ceiling" implies that the focus is on the fact of being tall

more examples

1. The lion was so tame that the lionkeeper could enter its cage
2. The lion was tame enough for the lioonkeeper to enter its cage
3. It was such a clear introductory lecture that we decided to take the course
4. It was a clear enough introductory lecture for us to decide to take the course
5. sentence 1 suggests that the lion was very time, whereas 2 does not
6. sentence 3 suggests that the lecture was very clear, while 4 does not

option C is wrong because after able or unable the verb to be is considered wordy; you use the verb to be twice

be able to be ...
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 314
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 318 [1] , given: 9

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2009, 00:54
1
KUDOS
bigtreezl wrote:
E is clear and concise

IMO the correct idioms with enough are
enough to and enough for
so E cannot be the correct answer choice
Manager
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 235
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 39

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2009, 03:40
A and D are very tempting, but we should choose A since the accent here is on "gradually" and so the answer is A.
_________________

Consider giving Kudos if you like the post.

Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2010, 10:27
thanks
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 164
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [1] , given: 29

Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2012, 03:35
1
KUDOS
OA is A.

1. so gradual as to be indistinguishable
Option 1 correctly follows the idiom "SO X AS TO Y".
Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 898
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 1044 [0], given: 543

Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2013, 02:15
Can someone provide a detailed analysis on this question. Thanks!
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1123
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 181

Kudos [?]: 1963 [2] , given: 219

Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2013, 05:45
2
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone provide a detailed analysis on this question. Thanks!

Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets

3 options have incorrect idioms/constructs:

* so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
* gradual enough not to be distinguishable
* gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them

I think that the battle goes on between A and C.
* so gradual as to be indistinguishable
* so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished

I)Both have correct idioms.
II)Both are grammatically correct, and the meaning is the same.

So which should we pick? We have "indistinguishable" VS "they are unable to be distinguished". If you cannot eliminate an answer because of meaning/grammatical/structural errors, choose the one the conveys the meaning more efficiently. The first option is clearly more concise.
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be   [#permalink] 21 Jul 2013, 05:45

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishab 19 21 Jul 2010, 06:59
Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be 5 31 Mar 2010, 22:14
1 Climatic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at 11 02 Feb 2009, 22:38
Climatic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at 1 02 Jul 2008, 15:58
Climatic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at 6 11 Jul 2007, 12:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by