|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2008
Posts: 115
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 2
|
OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation [#permalink]
 02 Apr 2009, 20:16
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
If the integer n has exactly 3 positive divisors, including 1 and n, how many positive divisors does n^2 have?
(A) 4
(B) 5
(C) 6
(D) 8
(E) 9
I don't understand why answer is B. Book explanation not clear.
Thanks!
Last edited by joyseychow on 29 Apr 2009, 02:35, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 375
Location: PDX
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
53
[0], given: 24
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#214-Need explanation [#permalink]
02 Apr 2009, 21:27
If an integer is to have just 3 factors including one and itself: it has to be the square of a prime. So n is the square of a prime = 3^2 = 9 n^2 = 9^2 = 81 81 has 5 factors, 1, 81, 3, 9 and 27. The same applies to all prime numbers. Hope this helps. -pradeep
_________________
In the land of the night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2008
Posts: 115
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 2
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#214-Need explanation [#permalink]
03 Apr 2009, 06:55
pbanavara wrote: If an integer is to have just 3 factors including one and itself: it has to be the square of a prime.
So n is the square of a prime = 3^2 = 9
n^2 = 9^2 = 81
81 has 5 factors, 1, 81, 3, 9 and 27.
The same applies to all prime numbers. Hope this helps.
-pradeep Thanks pradeep for the explanation! Learn something today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation [#permalink]
18 Aug 2009, 23:12
thanks, that makes waaay more sense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 134
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
81
[0], given: 13
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation [#permalink]
18 Aug 2009, 23:34
If the integer n has exactly 3 positive divisors, including 1 and n, how many positive divisors does n^2 have? From the question, we can get the divisors are: 1, t, n and n=t^2 therefore, for n^2=n*n, it will have 1, t, n, t*n, and n^2 as the divisors. thus the answer is B) 5.
_________________
Kudos me if my reply helps!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 173
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 1
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation [#permalink]
19 Aug 2009, 07:06
flyingbunny wrote: If the integer n has exactly 3 positive divisors, including 1 and n, how many positive divisors does n^2 have?
From the question, we can get the divisors are:
1, t, n and n=t^2
therefore, for n^2=n*n, it will have 1, t, n, t*n, and n^2 as the divisors.
thus the answer is B) 5. hey can you explain how you got this part (in color)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 134
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
81
[0], given: 13
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation [#permalink]
19 Aug 2009, 07:27
ALD wrote: flyingbunny wrote: If the integer n has exactly 3 positive divisors, including 1 and n, how many positive divisors does n^2 have?
From the question, we can get the divisors are:
1, t, n and n=t^2
therefore, for n^2=n*n, it will have 1, t, n, t*n, and n^2 as the divisors.
thus the answer is B) 5. hey can you explain how you got this part (in color) and n=t^2therefore n^2=n*n=t*t*n
_________________
Kudos me if my reply helps!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 619
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
92
[0], given: 100
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation [#permalink]
26 Aug 2009, 03:13
I dont understand the concept that if a no. has 3 positive divisors it is a perfect sq..HOW???WHY?? We know.. most nos. have even no. od divisors. prime nos. have exactly 2 divisors,1 and itself.. Can someone follow the same reasonung and explain the concept to me?
_________________
countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 4
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation [#permalink]
26 Aug 2009, 05:31
tejal777 wrote: I dont understand the concept that if a no. has 3 positive divisors it is a perfect sq..HOW???WHY??
We know..
most nos. have even no. od divisors.
prime nos. have exactly 2 divisors,1 and itself..
Can someone follow the same reasonung and explain the concept to me? Let's see.. the number N has EXACTLY 3 devisors: 1, x and itself N. (1<x<N) If we devide N by x, we get ... another x. (no 1, no N, no another y - as y is fourth devisor). Any N/x=x 4/2=2 ... 9/3=3... This x is a prime, coz if not then N would have more then 3 devisors Hope to pour a light on this issue)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3591
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 230
Kudos [?]:
1298
[0], given: 346
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation [#permalink]
26 Aug 2009, 05:55
There is a formula for the number of positive divisors for x: N = (1+n)*(1+m).... where, x = a^n*b^m....(a, b - prime numbers) So, in this question: 3=(1+n)(1+m).... it is only possible when n=2 (or m=2...) and other numbers equals 0. For x^2 = a^2n*b^2m... and N (for x^2) = (1+2n)(1+2m)... = (1+2*2)*1... = 5.
_________________
iPhone/iPod/iPad: GMAT ToolKit - The bestselling GMAT prep app | GMAT Club (free) | PrepGame | GRE ToolKit | LSAT ToolKit
Android: GMAT ToolKit (NEW!). POLL: What tool do you need next?
Math: GMAT Math Book ||| General: GMATTimer ||| Chicago Booth: Slide Presentation
The People Who Are Crazy Enough to Think They Can Change the World, Are the Ones Who Do.
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 190
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
47
[0], given: 12
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation [#permalink]
26 Aug 2009, 11:54
let 1, n1, n are the 3 factors of n, then n^2 will have factors:-
1,n1,n1^2,n,n^2.
Consider n^2 as n * n So, if n1 is a factos of n then , it will also be a factor of n^2. Similarly, we have 2 n's in n^2, so n1^2 will also be a factor of n^2.
So, answer is B only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: OG 11th Edition PS#241-Need explanation
[#permalink]
26 Aug 2009, 11:54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
close
