Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 11 Feb 2016, 20:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# OG 2 quant edition question

Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 7

OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  13 Jan 2010, 12:45
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:44) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 16 sessions
the official explanation for this problem is very long and time consuming.Can anyone suggest a shorter method for this.
Attachments

IMG_1176.JPG [ 182.52 KiB | Viewed 2107 times ]

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 366
Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 22

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  13 Jan 2010, 13:52
Nothing strikes to my mind really. No formula, no fundamentals, absolutely nothing. All I can guess is 5 and 10 are reasonably closer to 2 + 4 than 15 so C.
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 340
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 14

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  13 Jan 2010, 16:55
Lets wait for Bunuel to look in to this question . I am not sure how to even solve this ? This is not a regular pentagon , angels are also not mentioned
_________________

Intern
Joined: 31 Dec 2009
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 5

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  13 Jan 2010, 17:22
Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles.
Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c.
Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c)
Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)

In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices)
In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8
Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.

When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4
When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5
When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9
When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11

From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.
Manager
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 7

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  14 Jan 2010, 01:01
acegre wrote:
Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles.
Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c.
Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c)
Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)

In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices)
In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8
Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.

When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4
When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5
When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9
When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11

From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.

nice explanation.i have used the similar approach.but its still time consuming.

after going through this problem again.i thought of another approach.dont know whether its right.

we know for any triangle with side a,b,c

a-b < c < a+b

Consider triangle RST RS=4,ST=5,
so 5-4<RT<5+4 ,1<RT<9

similarly for triangle QRT QR=2,1<RT<9

so 0<QT<10

finally for triangle PQT PQ=3,0<QT<10

2<PT<12.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 2053
Followers: 81

Kudos [?]: 953 [0], given: 37

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  14 Jan 2010, 02:05
Expert's post
chetan2u wrote:
is it C

hi why i have ans C is...
look the figure can be transformed to any shape as angles are not given...
but the catch is PT cannot be greater than sum of all sides, sum is 14.. so 14 can be max ,...
so 15 is out... however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines..
time reqd for coming to ans is less than 30 secs..
_________________

BACK IN CLUB AFTER A GAP OF 6 YEARS

http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2009
Posts: 50
Location: Maryland
Schools: Stanford
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [1] , given: 5

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  14 Jan 2010, 02:29
1
KUDOS
hrish88 wrote:
acegre wrote:
Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles.
Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c.
Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c)
Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)

In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices)
In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8
Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.

When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4
When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5
When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9
When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11

From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.

nice explanation.i have used the similar approach.but its still time consuming.

after going through this problem again.i thought of another approach.dont know whether its right.

we know for any triangle with side a,b,c

a-b < c < a+b

Consider triangle RST RS=4,ST=5,
so 5-4<RT<5+4 ,1<RT<9

similarly for triangle QRT QR=2,1<RT<9

so 0<QT<10

finally for triangle PQT PQ=3,0<QT<10

2<PT<12.

Actually acegre's answer is really good.
I tried to solve the problem and it only takes about a minute to solve.
I solved it fast by just drawing everything and breaking down the pentagon into triangles.
First, you must remember that in triangles one side should not be bigger or equal to the sum of two other sides.
Then just draw small triangles and you will arrive to the correct answer, which is C. The PT should be less than 14. Thus the only possible answers are 5 and 10.
Attachments

polygon.jpg [ 88.55 KiB | Viewed 2005 times ]

_________________

If the post is helpful, kudos appreciated!

Manager
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 7

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  14 Jan 2010, 04:20
hrish88 wrote:
acegre wrote:
Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles.
Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c.
Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c)
Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)

In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices)
In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8
Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.

When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4
When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5
When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9
When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11

From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.

nice explanation.i have used the similar approach.but its still time consuming.

after going through this problem again.i thought of another approach.dont know whether its right.

we know for any triangle with side a,b,c

a-b < c < a+b

Consider triangle RST RS=4,ST=5,
so 5-4<RT<5+4 ,1<RT<9

similarly for triangle QRT QR=2,1<RT<9

so 0<QT<10

finally for triangle PQT PQ=3,0<QT<10

2<PT<12.

Actually acegre's answer is really good.
I tried to solve the problem and it only takes about a minute to solve.
I solved it fast by just drawing everything and breaking down the pentagon into triangles.
First, you must remember that in triangles one side should not be bigger or equal to the sum of two other sides.
Then just draw small triangles and you will arrive to the correct answer, which is C. The PT should be less than 14. Thus the only possible answers are 5 and 10.

u forgot to apply a-b<c here i.e one side should not be smaller or equal than the difference of two other sides

yeah acegre method is very good.i have used the same method.but its time consuming.

anyways my second method took less than 1 min.

chetan2u wrote:
chetan2u wrote:
is it C

hi why i have ans C is...
look the figure can be transformed to any shape as angles are not given...
but the catch is PT cannot be greater than sum of all sides, sum is 14.. so 14 can be max ,...
so 15 is out... however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines..
time reqd for coming to ans is less than 30 secs..

very nice explanation Chetan.

can you elaborate on this however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 2053
Followers: 81

Kudos [?]: 953 [1] , given: 37

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  14 Jan 2010, 04:43
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
hi hrish..
just take a stick 14m long which has one end as P and other as T.....
other pts are Q, R ,S at 3m,5m and 9m resp from P...the stick is bent at these pts...
first make it a straight line PT becomes 14m ,so 15m is out...
second imagine putting T on top of P, it will become quad with PT as 0... take a pt 1m from P and im sure u can place T on top of it, here PT becomes 1m... lly u can place T at a dist of 5 and 10m also from P.....
as u see the interior angles will adjust to give u the REQUIRED length of PT..
this is what i meant from however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines "
_________________

BACK IN CLUB AFTER A GAP OF 6 YEARS

http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372

Manager
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 7

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  14 Jan 2010, 04:51
Thnks Chetan.+1 for u

By the way OG says u have to check for 5 and 10 separately.

I have attached OG explanation below.
Attachments

IMG_1180.JPG [ 520.21 KiB | Viewed 1977 times ]

Intern
Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 43
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V35
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 3

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  26 Mar 2010, 06:30
oh, cool.

I too tried to find an alternate explanation for this specific problem. I was unsure how to search for it. I have tried to solve this problem twice, and both times it took me more than 3 minutes.
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2010
Posts: 267
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 2

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]  26 Mar 2010, 06:44
I followed the same approach as mentioned in OG and I think question is very much solvable in 2 mins.
Re: OG 2 quant edition question   [#permalink] 26 Mar 2010, 06:44
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Quant Questions 6 08 Apr 2011, 09:35
2 From MitDavidDv: GMAT Quant-Math Question #2 5 07 Apr 2011, 14:43
4 Is x^2 greater than x? 18 31 Oct 2010, 16:39
Need help solving 2 quant questions 6 27 Sep 2010, 22:17
OG Question 2 17 Oct 2009, 05:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by