Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
13 Jan 2010, 13:52
Nothing strikes to my mind really. No formula, no fundamentals, absolutely nothing. All I can guess is 5 and 10 are reasonably closer to 2 + 4 than 15 so C. _________________
Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
13 Jan 2010, 16:55
Lets wait for Bunuel to look in to this question . I am not sure how to even solve this ? This is not a regular pentagon , angels are also not mentioned _________________
Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
13 Jan 2010, 17:22
Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles. Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c. Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c) Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)
In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices) In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8 Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.
When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4 When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5 When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9 When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11
From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.
Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 01:01
acegre wrote:
Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles. Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c. Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c) Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)
In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices) In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8 Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.
When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4 When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5 When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9 When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11
From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.
nice explanation.i have used the similar approach.but its still time consuming.
after going through this problem again.i thought of another approach.dont know whether its right.
we know for any triangle with side a,b,c
a-b < c < a+b
Consider triangle RST RS=4,ST=5, so 5-4<RT<5+4 ,1<RT<9
Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 02:05
Expert's post
chetan2u wrote:
is it C
hi why i have ans C is... look the figure can be transformed to any shape as angles are not given... but the catch is PT cannot be greater than sum of all sides, sum is 14.. so 14 can be max ,... so 15 is out... however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines.. time reqd for coming to ans is less than 30 secs.. _________________
Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 02:29
1
This post received KUDOS
hrish88 wrote:
acegre wrote:
Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles. Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c. Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c) Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)
In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices) In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8 Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.
When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4 When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5 When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9 When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11
From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.
nice explanation.i have used the similar approach.but its still time consuming.
after going through this problem again.i thought of another approach.dont know whether its right.
we know for any triangle with side a,b,c
a-b < c < a+b
Consider triangle RST RS=4,ST=5, so 5-4<RT<5+4 ,1<RT<9
similarly for triangle QRT QR=2,1<RT<9
so 0<QT<10
finally for triangle PQT PQ=3,0<QT<10
2<PT<12.
Actually acegre's answer is really good. I tried to solve the problem and it only takes about a minute to solve. I solved it fast by just drawing everything and breaking down the pentagon into triangles. Please look at my picture and try to follow the logic. First, you must remember that in triangles one side should not be bigger or equal to the sum of two other sides. Then just draw small triangles and you will arrive to the correct answer, which is C. The PT should be less than 14. Thus the only possible answers are 5 and 10.
Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 04:20
vladik210 wrote:
hrish88 wrote:
acegre wrote:
Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles. Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c. Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c) Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)
In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices) In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8 Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.
When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4 When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5 When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9 When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11
From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.
nice explanation.i have used the similar approach.but its still time consuming.
after going through this problem again.i thought of another approach.dont know whether its right.
we know for any triangle with side a,b,c
a-b < c < a+b
Consider triangle RST RS=4,ST=5, so 5-4<RT<5+4 ,1<RT<9
similarly for triangle QRT QR=2,1<RT<9
so 0<QT<10
finally for triangle PQT PQ=3,0<QT<10
2<PT<12.
Actually acegre's answer is really good. I tried to solve the problem and it only takes about a minute to solve. I solved it fast by just drawing everything and breaking down the pentagon into triangles. Please look at my picture and try to follow the logic. First, you must remember that in triangles one side should not be bigger or equal to the sum of two other sides. Then just draw small triangles and you will arrive to the correct answer, which is C. The PT should be less than 14. Thus the only possible answers are 5 and 10.
u forgot to apply a-b<c here i.e one side should not be smaller or equal than the difference of two other sides
yeah acegre method is very good.i have used the same method.but its time consuming.
anyways my second method took less than 1 min.
chetan2u wrote:
chetan2u wrote:
is it C
hi why i have ans C is... look the figure can be transformed to any shape as angles are not given... but the catch is PT cannot be greater than sum of all sides, sum is 14.. so 14 can be max ,... so 15 is out... however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines.. time reqd for coming to ans is less than 30 secs..
very nice explanation Chetan.
can you elaborate on this however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines
Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 04:43
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
hi hrish.. just take a stick 14m long which has one end as P and other as T..... other pts are Q, R ,S at 3m,5m and 9m resp from P...the stick is bent at these pts... first make it a straight line PT becomes 14m ,so 15m is out... second imagine putting T on top of P, it will become quad with PT as 0... take a pt 1m from P and im sure u can place T on top of it, here PT becomes 1m... lly u can place T at a dist of 5 and 10m also from P..... as u see the interior angles will adjust to give u the REQUIRED length of PT.. this is what i meant from however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines " _________________
Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
26 Mar 2010, 06:30
oh, cool.
I too tried to find an alternate explanation for this specific problem. I was unsure how to search for it. I have tried to solve this problem twice, and both times it took me more than 3 minutes.
The “3 golden nuggets” of MBA admission process With ten years of experience helping prospective students with MBA admissions and career progression, I will be writing this blog through...
You know what’s worse than getting a ding at one of your dreams schools . Yes its getting that horrid wait-listed email . This limbo is frustrating as hell . Somewhere...
Wow! MBA life is hectic indeed. Time flies by. It is hard to keep track of the time. Last week was high intense training Yeah, Finance, Accounting, Marketing, Economics...