Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
13 Jan 2010, 13:52

Nothing strikes to my mind really. No formula, no fundamentals, absolutely nothing. All I can guess is 5 and 10 are reasonably closer to 2 + 4 than 15 so C. _________________

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
13 Jan 2010, 16:55

Lets wait for Bunuel to look in to this question . I am not sure how to even solve this ? This is not a regular pentagon , angels are also not mentioned _________________

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
13 Jan 2010, 17:22

Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles. Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c. Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c) Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)

In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices) In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8 Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.

When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4 When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5 When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9 When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11

From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 01:01

acegre wrote:

Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles. Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c. Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c) Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)

In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices) In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8 Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.

When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4 When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5 When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9 When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11

From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.

nice explanation.i have used the similar approach.but its still time consuming.

after going through this problem again.i thought of another approach.dont know whether its right.

we know for any triangle with side a,b,c

a-b < c < a+b

Consider triangle RST RS=4,ST=5, so 5-4<RT<5+4 ,1<RT<9

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 02:05

chetan2u wrote:

is it C

hi why i have ans C is... look the figure can be transformed to any shape as angles are not given... but the catch is PT cannot be greater than sum of all sides, sum is 14.. so 14 can be max ,... so 15 is out... however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines.. time reqd for coming to ans is less than 30 secs..

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 02:29

1

This post received KUDOS

hrish88 wrote:

acegre wrote:

Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles. Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c. Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c) Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)

In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices) In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8 Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.

When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4 When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5 When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9 When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11

From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.

nice explanation.i have used the similar approach.but its still time consuming.

after going through this problem again.i thought of another approach.dont know whether its right.

we know for any triangle with side a,b,c

a-b < c < a+b

Consider triangle RST RS=4,ST=5, so 5-4<RT<5+4 ,1<RT<9

similarly for triangle QRT QR=2,1<RT<9

so 0<QT<10

finally for triangle PQT PQ=3,0<QT<10

2<PT<12.

Actually acegre's answer is really good. I tried to solve the problem and it only takes about a minute to solve. I solved it fast by just drawing everything and breaking down the pentagon into triangles. Please look at my picture and try to follow the logic. First, you must remember that in triangles one side should not be bigger or equal to the sum of two other sides. Then just draw small triangles and you will arrive to the correct answer, which is C. The PT should be less than 14. Thus the only possible answers are 5 and 10.

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 04:20

vladik210 wrote:

hrish88 wrote:

acegre wrote:

Hi Here is my approach.. Split the pentagon into triangles. Properties of triangle with sides a,b and c. Sum of any two sides is greater than third side.( eg. a+b > c) Third side is greater than difference of the other two sides.( eg. a> b-c)

In triangle PQR PR can take values >1 and <5. So PR can be 2,3,4(considering only whole numbers based on the answer choices) In traingle RST, RT can be >1 and < 9. RT can be 2,3,4...8 Now for triangle PRT, consider exteme values of PR and RT to determine range of PT.

When PR=2, RT=2, PT is >0 and < 4. PT can be 1,2,3,4 When PR=4,RT=2, PT is >2 and <6. PT can be 3,4,5 When PR=2, RT =8, PT is >6 and <10. PT can be 7,8,9 When PR=4, RT=8, PT is >4 and < 12. PT can be 5,6,7...11

From all the values above and choices provided, PT can be 5 and 10. 15 is not possible. Hence IMO C.

nice explanation.i have used the similar approach.but its still time consuming.

after going through this problem again.i thought of another approach.dont know whether its right.

we know for any triangle with side a,b,c

a-b < c < a+b

Consider triangle RST RS=4,ST=5, so 5-4<RT<5+4 ,1<RT<9

similarly for triangle QRT QR=2,1<RT<9

so 0<QT<10

finally for triangle PQT PQ=3,0<QT<10

2<PT<12.

Actually acegre's answer is really good. I tried to solve the problem and it only takes about a minute to solve. I solved it fast by just drawing everything and breaking down the pentagon into triangles. Please look at my picture and try to follow the logic. First, you must remember that in triangles one side should not be bigger or equal to the sum of two other sides. Then just draw small triangles and you will arrive to the correct answer, which is C. The PT should be less than 14. Thus the only possible answers are 5 and 10.

u forgot to apply a-b<c here i.e one side should not be smaller or equal than the difference of two other sides

yeah acegre method is very good.i have used the same method.but its time consuming.

anyways my second method took less than 1 min.

chetan2u wrote:

chetan2u wrote:

is it C

hi why i have ans C is... look the figure can be transformed to any shape as angles are not given... but the catch is PT cannot be greater than sum of all sides, sum is 14.. so 14 can be max ,... so 15 is out... however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines.. time reqd for coming to ans is less than 30 secs..

very nice explanation Chetan.

can you elaborate on this however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
14 Jan 2010, 04:43

1

This post received KUDOS

hi hrish.. just take a stick 14m long which has one end as P and other as T..... other pts are Q, R ,S at 3m,5m and 9m resp from P...the stick is bent at these pts... first make it a straight line PT becomes 14m ,so 15m is out... second imagine putting T on top of P, it will become quad with PT as 0... take a pt 1m from P and im sure u can place T on top of it, here PT becomes 1m... lly u can place T at a dist of 5 and 10m also from P..... as u see the interior angles will adjust to give u the REQUIRED length of PT.. this is what i meant from however < 14 can be made with putting different angles between lines "

Re: OG 2 quant edition question [#permalink]
26 Mar 2010, 06:30

oh, cool.

I too tried to find an alternate explanation for this specific problem. I was unsure how to search for it. I have tried to solve this problem twice, and both times it took me more than 3 minutes.

My three goals of business school: entrepreneurship, network, and professor mentor. I want to build something. I want to meet new people and create life-long friendships. I want to...

According to the initial plan, I was supposed to get into Stanford and any other school then choose Stanford. But that is not going to happen so here’s...

One thing I did not know when recruiting for the MBA summer internship was the following: just how important prior experience in the function that you're recruiting for...