Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 May 2016, 18:35
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Og11 Cr-9 Mayor : In each of the past five years, the city

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
Posts: 18
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Og11 Cr-9 Mayor : In each of the past five years, the city [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2010, 15:07
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

90% (02:20) correct 10% (01:56) wrong based on 28 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

Og11 Cr-9
Mayor : In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.

Which of the following , if true, most strongly supports the mayor's conclusion?

(A)The city's schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided non essential services.
(B) Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city's schools to provide some nonessential services.
(C) Price estimates quoted to the city's schools for the provision of non essential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school-funding cut.
(D) Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city's schools.
(E) The city's school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of the threatened funding cuts.

I post this question for asking another thing

Do you guys think that the answer choice C can be an assumption for this argument?

I am confused b/w assumption and strength :( .
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 224
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 3

Re: og 11 cr-9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2010, 17:26
Answer is B.

Mayor's conclusion is - So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services. Thus cuts can be made from non-essential expenditures. Thus it implies that still there are sufficient funds available for non-essentials services.

Thus Mayor's conclusion is solely based on the fact that there are still sufficient funds for non-essential services which can be cut without affecting essentials services.

OA please. Thanks.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 205
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 7

Re: og 11 cr-9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2010, 14:33
ans B for the same reason as cited above!
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 362
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 305 [0], given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: og 11 cr-9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2010, 15:25
lys8207 wrote:
Og11 Cr-9
Mayor : In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.

Which of the following , if true, most strongly supports the mayor's conclusion?

(A)The city's schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided non essential services.
(B) Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city's schools to provide some nonessential services.
(C) Price estimates quoted to the city's schools for the provision of non essential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school-funding cut.
(D) Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city's schools.
(E) The city's school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of the threatened funding cuts.

I post this question for asking another thing

Do you guys think that the answer choice C can be an assumption for this argument?

I am confused b/w assumption and strength :( .


Answer is B....

For strengthing question.... just concentrate on the Conclusion.... "So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services." and see which statement can make this conclusion more strong! Even u wld choose B..
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!! :beer

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|


~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 366
Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 22

Re: og 11 cr-9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2010, 19:38
lys8207 wrote:
I am confused b/w assumption and strength :( .


PowerScore states that Assumption is an unstated premise. Typically in question stimulus that require you to identify an assumption, premise will discuss about something, but the conclusion will take you to an entirely different arena. There is something stated and there is something totally new that is concluded. An assumption will help you bridge that gap.

Strengthen or weaken questions on the other hand will attack the conclusion. Typically they are unstated premises as well, but most often they are additional by nature. Identifying an answer option that goes hand-in-hand with the given premises in the stimulus is very easy to identify, so the test-makers will often try to bring in new or extra information that will have a direct impact on the conclusion, that is what makes the correct answers as additional premises. However, it does not mean that assumptions cannot strengthen.

The answer options will be formulated based on the question stem posed, so you need not worry about what is not asked. There is also not sufficient time to ponder over such aspects of the question. Just stay focussed on what is asked and try and eliminate what seems wrong.
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 176
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: og 11 cr-9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2010, 11:37
IMO B
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 51

Re: og 11 cr-9 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2011, 08:51
B is the answer. no other option contends.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7385
Followers: 697

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Og11 Cr-9 Mayor : In each of the past five years, the city [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Feb 2016, 10:39
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Og11 Cr-9 Mayor : In each of the past five years, the city   [#permalink] 07 Feb 2016, 10:39
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 In each of the past five years, imhimanshu 4 28 Sep 2013, 07:58
5 During each of the past five years, the total demand for kidchaos 13 09 Oct 2010, 12:21
1 Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut RaviChandra 4 31 Mar 2010, 06:21
2 Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut snipertrader 7 05 Aug 2009, 19:49
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut clubzzang 7 24 Jun 2008, 16:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Og11 Cr-9 Mayor : In each of the past five years, the city

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.