I think its C
Oil Company: We care about the environment
Environmentalist: You only care about the economic impact, not the actual environment
The environmentalist's conclusion would be properly drawn if it were true that the
(A) oil company cannot have more than one motive for cleaning the otters affected by the oil spill ==> Makes sense but doesn't tie the economic impact to oil company's actions
(B) otter population in the area of the oil spill could not have survived without the cleaning project ==> Out of scope
(C) oil company has always shown a high regard for its profits in choosing its courses of action ==> Correct! Its the only one that ties the level of sales to the argument.
(D) government would have spent the money to clean the otters if the oil company had not agreed to do it ==> Out of scope
(E) oil company's efforts toward cleaning the affected otters have been more successful than have such efforts in previous projects to clean up oil spills ==> Out of scope
Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...