Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 05:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 321 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning [#permalink] New post 18 May 2009, 23:07
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning the otters affected by our recent oil spill than has been spent on any previous marine mammal rescue project. This shows our concern for the environment.
Environmentalist: You have no such concern. Your real concern is evident in your admission to the press that news photographs of oil-covered otters would be particularly damaging to your public image, which plays an important role in your level of sales.
The environmentalist’s conclusion would be properly drawn if it were true that the
(A) oil company cannot have more than one motive for cleaning the otters affected by the oil spill
(B) otter population in the area of the oil spill could not have survived without the cleaning project
(C) oil company has always shown a high regard for its profits in choosing its courses of action
(D) government would have spent the money to clean the otters if the oil company had not agreed to do it
(E) oil company’s efforts toward cleaning the affected otters have been more successful than have such efforts in previous projects to clean up oil spills
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1578
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

Re: Otters [#permalink] New post 19 May 2009, 01:33
I will go with A. If there is more than one motive, then both the concerns are addressed and the environmentalist's claim does not hold good.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 258
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 1

Re: Otters [#permalink] New post 19 May 2009, 01:48
IMO A. An assumption question

Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning the otters affected by our recent oil spill than has been spent on any previous marine mammal rescue project. This shows our concern for the environment.
Environmentalist: You have no such concern. Your real concern is evident in your admission to the press that news photographs of oil-covered otters would be particularly damaging to your public image, which plays an important role in your level of sales.
The environmentalist’s conclusion would be properly drawn if it were true that the
(A) oil company cannot have more than one motive for cleaning the otters affected by the oil spill -->if it has more than one purpose for its action, the other purposes could contain environmental concern --> weaken the conclusion of environmentalist
(B) otter population in the area of the oil spill could not have survived without the cleaning project -->this is not the main point that the environmentalist wants to emphasize, though this choice is attractive
(C) oil company has always shown a high regard for its profits in choosing its courses of action --> too general
(D) government would have spent the money to clean the otters if the oil company had not agreed to do it --> irrelevant
(E) oil company’s efforts toward cleaning the affected otters have been more successful than have such efforts in previous projects to clean up oil spills -->out of scope
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 295
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 3

Re: Otters [#permalink] New post 19 May 2009, 03:31
This is a justify the conclusion question and not an assumption question.

a. company cannot have more than one motive for cleaning the otters affected by the oil spill --> doesnt truely justify the conclusion. Company can have more than one motives. what is important is the priority

b. oil company has always shown a high regard for its profits in choosing its courses of action -Hihgest preference is profits. So it acts in a way which effects its profits. Hence the answer

What is the oa ?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 321 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: Otters [#permalink] New post 19 May 2009, 21:26
Guys, if there is no "always" in C, is C correct? C is very fit with what the enviromentalist says.
Thanks
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 295
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 3

Re: Otters [#permalink] New post 19 May 2009, 22:04
OA please ?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 7

Re: Otters [#permalink] New post 20 May 2009, 03:16
I went for C.
sondenso wrote:
Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning the otters affected by our recent oil spill than has been spent on any previous marine mammal rescue project. This shows our concern for the environment.
Environmentalist: You have no such concern. Your real concern is evident in your admission to the press that news photographs of oil-covered otters would be particularly damaging to your public image, which plays an important role in your level of sales.
The environmentalist’s conclusion would be properly drawn if it were true that the
(A) oil company cannot have more than one motive for cleaning the otters affected by the oil spill oil company may have many motives and still not care about environment.
(B) otter population in the area of the oil spill could not have survived without the cleaning project
(C) oil company has always shown a high regard for its profits in choosing its courses of action CORRECT
(D) government would have spent the money to clean the otters if the oil company had not agreed to do it
(E) oil company’s efforts toward cleaning the affected otters have been more successful than have such efforts in previous projects to clean up oil spills
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 319
Location: Hungary
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Re: Otters [#permalink] New post 20 May 2009, 04:49
I support answer A.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 160
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 5

Re: Otters [#permalink] New post 20 May 2009, 08:38
IMO A , only 1 motive protecting their public image.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 321 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: Otters [#permalink] New post 20 May 2009, 23:50
Re: Otters   [#permalink] 20 May 2009, 23:50
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Oil companies are converting more and more of the full prakash111687 2 18 Jun 2012, 05:54
Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning nverma 10 19 Apr 2010, 10:29
In the past decade, a decreasing % of money spent on joemama142000 9 04 Jan 2010, 16:39
Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning JAI HIND 6 20 Dec 2005, 07:13
Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning saurya_s 9 01 Mar 2005, 05:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Oil company representative: We spent more money on cleaning

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.