Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]
09 Aug 2008, 00:09
1
This post received KUDOS
19
This post was BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
35% (medium)
Question Stats:
68% (01:39) correct
32% (00:44) wrong based on 800 sessions
On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2. What was the number of men on the sight-seeing tour?
(1) On the sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of children to the number of men was 5 to 11. (2) The number of women on the sight-seeing tour was less than 30.
Re: DS - Sight Seeing Tour [#permalink]
09 Aug 2008, 00:31
6
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
clubzzang wrote:
Ppl, pls help me solve this q.
On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2. What was the number of men on the sight-seeing tour?
(1) On the sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of chilren to the number of men was 5 to 11. (2) The number of women on the sight-seeing tour was less than 30.
Thanks!
C.
w:c = 5:2
1) c:m = 5:11
w:c:m = 25:10:22
But this does not give us exact number of men
2) this itself does not tell anything about number of men.
Toegther, since number of women is less than 30 and since the number of ppl will always be an integer and also that 25:10:22 can not be reduced further => there will be 25 women => there will be 22 men. thus suff
could someone explain this differently please _________________
But there’s something in me that just keeps going on. I think it has something to do with tomorrow, that there is always one, and that everything can change when it comes. http://aimingformba.blogspot.com
On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of women to the number of children was 5 to 2. What was the number of men on the sight-seeing tour?
Given: \(\frac{w}{c}=\frac{5}{2}\) --> \(w=5x\) and \(c=2x\) for some integer \(x\). Q: \(m=?\)
(1) on the sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of children to the number of men was 5 to 11 --> \(\frac{c}{m}=\frac{5}{11}\) --> \(c=5y\) and \(m=11y\), for some integer \(y\). Not sufficient to calculate \(m\).
(2) the number of women on the sight-seeing tour was less than 30 --> \(w<30\). Not sufficient to calculate \(m\).
(1)+(2) \(w=5x<30\) --> \(x<6\). \(c=2x\) and as \(c=5y\), \(c\) is a multiple of 5 --> \(x=5\) --> \(c=10=5y\) --> \(y=2\) --> \(m=11y=22\). Sufficient.
Answer: C.
OR: \(\frac{\frac{w}{c}}{m}=\frac{\frac{25}{10}}{22}\) --> \(\frac{w}{m}=\frac{25}{22}\) and as \(w<30\), then \(w=25\) because for other values of \(w<30\), \(m\) (and \(c\)) are not integers --> \(m=22\).
My answer is C from 1 statement we can find out the whole ratio W to Child and Men alone insuf because we need not ratio but number from statement 2 alone we dn't get anything
1 and 2 together do the job!My approuch to DS may be wrong but why to solve further if you already know that from 1 and 2 we can figure out the answer!IMHO
Further calculations may be needed because the lowest number of women needed to satisfy the ratio may be > 30, in which case the answer would've been E. So just changing the ratios a bit can change the answer.
Re: Sightseeing tour- DS [#permalink]
29 May 2011, 06:42
3
This post received KUDOS
Another specific way of answering: Given w/c= 5/2, c = 2/5(w) (1) c/m = 5/11, m = 11/5(c) insufficient (2) w < 30, no information about men, insufficient.
Considering C: m = 11/5c = 11/5 * 2/5(w) = 22/25(w) and w < 30 here only 25 is a multiple of 25. so w = 5 = 22 Ans. C. _________________
Re: Sightseeing tour- DS [#permalink]
20 Nov 2011, 22:12
Baten80 wrote:
Another specific way of answering: Given w/c= 5/2, c = 2/5(w) (1) c/m = 5/11, m = 11/5(c) insufficient (2) w < 30, no information about men, insufficient.
Considering C: m = 11/5c = 11/5 * 2/5(w) = 22/25(w) and w < 30 here only 25 is a multiple of 25. so w = 5 = 22 Ans. C.
Hi
Sorry I got a bit lost in the logic. Also, i completely do understand the significance of the sentence below in this Q
2. The number of women on the sightseeing tour was less than 30.
Would appreciate your help.
I get how m = 22/25(w)
but then you have mentioned only 25 is a multiple of 25. so w = 5. If we replace 5 with w in this eq -> m = 22/25(w) then m would be 22/5 and not 22? Did you mean to say w = 25 (and mistyped 5)?
Re: On a certain sightseeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]
15 Jan 2012, 15:24
This is how I solved it :
Given - W/C = 5/2
From statement 1 we get C/M = 5/11
with this we can get W/M = 25/22
Since we dont the number it wont help so insiffucient.
Statement 2 - we get Women less than 30. wont help So insufficnet.
Combining.
We know that W/M = 25/22 and women # is less that 30 it will be possible only if men are 22 in number based on the ratio we derived from statement 1. so answer C
Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]
20 Jun 2014, 17:16
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]
11 Jul 2014, 10:33
Expert's post
LTN99 wrote:
Brunel, why can the number not of women not be 0. 25x:10x:22x with x=0 both statements would still told true.
That's not true. If x=0, then w = m = c = 0. But in this case none of the ratios given is true because 0/0 is undefined and not 5:2 or 5:11. _________________
Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]
19 Oct 2014, 02:29
One small doubt regarding this. When it says that the number of women is less than 30, wouldn't 0 be a valid scenario? In that case number of men would be 0 too .. so it could either be 22 men or 0 men.
Hence option E.
I know 0 sounds a bit illogical but in mathematical terms, it is possible I guess. Please advise.
Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]
19 Oct 2014, 03:10
Expert's post
rakhauri wrote:
One small doubt regarding this. When it says that the number of women is less than 30, wouldn't 0 be a valid scenario? In that case number of men would be 0 too .. so it could either be 22 men or 0 men.
Hence option E.
I know 0 sounds a bit illogical but in mathematical terms, it is possible I guess. Please advise.
Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of [#permalink]
27 Sep 2015, 19:37
I got this question wrong because based on the givens, the number of women could have been 5, 10, 15 or any number under 30, which would leave to an indeterminate amount of children and further an indeterminate amount of men.
An answer choice of C is based on an assumption that was not specified in the question. Must we always make assumptions like this? This is frustrating. Sometimes I think the language on some of these questions is a little too vague (not necessarily saying that is true of this one).
gmatclubot
Re: On a certain sight-seeing tour, the ratio of the number of
[#permalink]
27 Sep 2015, 19:37
You know what’s worse than getting a ding at one of your dreams schools . Yes its getting that horrid wait-listed email . This limbo is frustrating as hell . Somewhere...
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Wow! MBA life is hectic indeed. Time flies by. It is hard to keep track of the time. Last week was high intense training Yeah, Finance, Accounting, Marketing, Economics...