On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at : GMAT Problem Solving (PS)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 16:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 96
Location: India
Schools: LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 78 [7] , given: 6

On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2009, 02:56
7
KUDOS
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

32% (02:13) correct 68% (01:34) wrong based on 296 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at a time. There are a total of 25 horses. There is no way of timing the races. What is the minimum number of races we need to conduct to get the top 3 fastest horses?

A. 5
B. 7
C. 8
D. 10
E. 11
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The Legion dies, it does not surrender.

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 419
Location: Sydney, Australia
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 20

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2009, 06:45
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
On every race we get the top 3 out of 5.

First 5 Races = Take 3 from each race = 15
Next 3 Races = Take 3 from each race = 9
At this point I figured that we only need 3 horses and we have 2 races. So take the top 2.
Next 2 Races = Take 2 from each race = 4
Last race we get the top 3.

Total races = 5+3+2+1 = 11
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 96
Location: India
Schools: LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 78 [1] , given: 6

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2009, 08:50
1
KUDOS
Its not E. Bit more complicated then that
_________________

The Legion dies, it does not surrender.

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36540
Followers: 7072

Kudos [?]: 93033 [22] , given: 10541

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2009, 09:13
22
KUDOS
Expert's post
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I came down to 7. I mean that I can do the task in 7 races.

First 5 races: all horses by five. We'll have the five winners.

Race 6: the winners of previous five races. We'll have the 3 winners.
Now it's obvious that #1 here is the fastest one (gold medal).
For the silver and bronze we'll have 5 pretenders:
1. #2 from the last sixth race,
2. #3 from the last sixth race,
3. the second one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
4. the third one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
5. the second one from the race with the one which took the silver in the sixth race

Race 7: these five horse: first and second in this one will have the silver and bronze among all 25.

Good Q. +1
_________________
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 96
Location: India
Schools: LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2009, 10:35

Good solution Buneul.
_________________

The Legion dies, it does not surrender.

SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2492
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 734 [0], given: 19

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2009, 20:57
jax91 wrote:
On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at a time. There are a total of 25 horses. There is no way of timing the races. What is the minimum number of races we need to conduct to get the top 3 fastest horses?

A)5
B)7
C)8
D)10
E)11

Nice work by both "yangsta8" and "Bunuel". Both solutions are equally logical...

The OA could be controversial as the question is not clear about the method how 1/2/3 are selected...

yangsta8 wrote:
On every race we get the top 3 out of 5.

First 5 Races = Take 3 from each race = 15
Next 3 Races = Take 3 from each race = 9
At this point I figured that we only need 3 horses and we have 2 races. So take the top 2.
Next 2 Races = Take 2 from each race = 4
Last race we get the top 3.

Total races = 5+3+2+1 = 11

Bunuel wrote:
I came down to 7. I mean that I can do the task in 7 races.

First 5 races: all horses by five. We'll have the five winners.

Race 6: the winners of previous five races. We'll have the 3 winners.
Now it's obvious that #1 here is the fastest one (gold medal).
For the silver and bronze we'll have 5 pretenders:
1. #2 from the last sixth race,
2. #3 from the last sixth race,
3. the second one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
4. the third one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
5. the second one from the race with the one which took the silver in the sixth race

Race 7: these five horse: first and second in this one will have the silver and bronze among all 25.

Good Q. +1

_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 302
Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 194

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2010, 12:18
Why 7 races? I think we can do it in just 6 races, as shown on the picture.
The 6th race will determine the best three winners (Gold, Silver, and Bronze) of the previous 5 races...

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36540
Followers: 7072

Kudos [?]: 93033 [2] , given: 10541

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2010, 12:31
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Financier wrote:
Why 7 races? I think we can do it in just 6 races, as shown on the picture.
The 6th race will determine the best three of winners of the previous 5 races...

We want to get the top 3 fastest horses. The trick here is that though the horse #1 from 6th race will be the fastest one, so gold medal owner but the horse #2 and #3 from this race may not be the second and the third fastest horses out of 25.

For the silver and bronze we would have 5 pretenders:
1. #2 from the 6th race;
2. #3 from the 6th race;
3. the second horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;
4. the third horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;
5. the second horse from the first round race with horse #2 in the 6th.

So total 7 races are needed.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 210
Schools: ISB, HEC, Said
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 28

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2010, 06:09
Nice question.. Thanks for posting
Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Posts: 70
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 18

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2010, 03:03
Bunuel wrote:

For the silver and bronze we would have 5 pretenders:
1. #2 from the 6th race;
2. #3 from the 6th race;
3. the second horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;
4. the third horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;
5. the second horse from the first round race with horse #2 in the 6th.

So total 7 races are needed.

Bunuel,

It is uncertain to me that how we can be sure to pick horses for 7th race..

Isn't a possibility that second horse from Gold Medal winner group can be slower than the second horse in Bronze Medal winner group?

Lets say: The Gold medal horse took 2 mins, second horse in the Gold medal group took 5 mins to cover the race. While Bronze medal horse took 3 mins and second horse from Bronze medal group took 4 mins.

In that case, we need to change this:
"second horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;" with "second horse from the first round race with the Bronze medal winner;"

_________________

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36540
Followers: 7072

Kudos [?]: 93033 [1] , given: 10541

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2010, 04:19
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
samark wrote:
Bunuel wrote:

For the silver and bronze we would have 5 pretenders:
1. #2 from the 6th race;
2. #3 from the 6th race;
3. the second horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;
4. the third horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;
5. the second horse from the first round race with horse #2 in the 6th.

So total 7 races are needed.

Bunuel,

It is uncertain to me that how we can be sure to pick horses for 7th race..

Isn't a possibility that second horse from Gold Medal winner group can be slower than the second horse in Bronze Medal winner group?

Lets say: The Gold medal horse took 2 mins, second horse in the Gold medal group took 5 mins to cover the race. While Bronze medal horse took 3 mins and second horse from Bronze medal group took 4 mins.

In that case, we need to change this:
"second horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;" with "second horse from the first round race with the Bronze medal winner;"

The trick here is that we should choose the horses for the last race so that each horse to be pretender for either the Silver or the Bronze medal.

Now, second horse from the first round race with horse #3 in the 6th race could be faster than the second horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner, but if it is so could this horse get any medal? It's obviously slower than horse #3 and also slower that horse #2 (from the last race) so there is no sense to include this horse in the last race. Similar logic works for other horses.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Posts: 70
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 18

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2010, 22:40
Bunuel wrote:
samark wrote:
Bunuel wrote:

For the silver and bronze we would have 5 pretenders:
1. #2 from the 6th race;
2. #3 from the 6th race;
3. the second horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;
4. the third horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;
5. the second horse from the first round race with horse #2 in the 6th.

So total 7 races are needed.

Bunuel,

It is uncertain to me that how we can be sure to pick horses for 7th race..

Isn't a possibility that second horse from Gold Medal winner group can be slower than the second horse in Bronze Medal winner group?

Lets say: The Gold medal horse took 2 mins, second horse in the Gold medal group took 5 mins to cover the race. While Bronze medal horse took 3 mins and second horse from Bronze medal group took 4 mins.

In that case, we need to change this:
"second horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner;" with "second horse from the first round race with the Bronze medal winner;"

The trick here is that we should choose the horses for the last race so that each horse to be pretender for either the Silver or the Bronze medal.

Now, second horse from the first round race with horse #3 in the 6th race could be faster than the second horse from the first round race with the Gold medal winner, but if it is so could this horse get any medal? It's obviously slower than horse #3 and also slower that horse #2 (from the last race) so there is no sense to include this horse in the last race. Similar logic works for other horses.

Hope it's clear.

Yes, after much head banging and heated discussion with my fellow study partner. Thanks!
_________________

Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2009
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2010, 04:51
if the runner up in the first race is the fastest among all except the winner of the first race.How could you leave that horse?
Manager
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 220
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 166

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2011, 22:56
nice question
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 506
Schools: Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 674 [0], given: 276

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2012, 03:32
Bunuel wrote:
I came down to 7. I mean that I can do the task in 7 races.

First 5 races: all horses by five. We'll have the five winners.

Race 6: the winners of previous five races. We'll have the 3 winners.
Now it's obvious that #1 here is the fastest one (gold medal).
For the silver and bronze we'll have 5 pretenders:
1. #2 from the last sixth race,
2. #3 from the last sixth race,
3. the second one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
4. the third one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
5. the second one from the race with the one which took the silver in the sixth race

Race 7: these five horse: first and second in this one will have the silver and bronze among all 25.

Good Q. +1

Hi Bunuel,

I have a doubt regarding the solution. The question is asking for Fastest 3 horses & not the Top 3 Winners.
Let me put it this way.
Suppose 2 separate races were conducted & timing (in minutes) of these 10 horses are as follows:
Race 1 - 5, 6, 7, 8 , 9, 10 minutes
Race 1 - 8 , 9, 10, 11, 12 minutes

Now you are picking 5 from race-1 & 8 from race 2 because these 2 horses are winners. But these 2 horses are not the fastest horses. The 2 fastest horses from this scenario would be 5 & 6 min.

Kindly throw some light this logic.
_________________

If you like my Question/Explanation or the contribution, Kindly appreciate by pressing KUDOS.
Kudos always maximizes GMATCLUB worth
-Game Theory

If you have any question regarding my post, kindly pm me or else I won't be able to reply

Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 149
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.61
WE: Consulting (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 103

### Show Tags

29 May 2013, 20:10
Bunuel wrote:
I came down to 7. I mean that I can do the task in 7 races.

First 5 races: all horses by five. We'll have the five winners.

Race 6: the winners of previous five races. We'll have the 3 winners.
Now it's obvious that #1 here is the fastest one (gold medal).
For the silver and bronze we'll have 5 pretenders:
1. #2 from the last sixth race,
2. #3 from the last sixth race,
3. the second one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
4. the third one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
5. the second one from the race with the one which took the silver in the sixth race

Race 7: these five horse: first and second in this one will have the silver and bronze among all 25.

Good Q. +1

Hi Bunnel,

Is this a GMAT-kind question?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36540
Followers: 7072

Kudos [?]: 93033 [0], given: 10541

### Show Tags

30 May 2013, 00:03
cumulonimbus wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
I came down to 7. I mean that I can do the task in 7 races.

First 5 races: all horses by five. We'll have the five winners.

Race 6: the winners of previous five races. We'll have the 3 winners.
Now it's obvious that #1 here is the fastest one (gold medal).
For the silver and bronze we'll have 5 pretenders:
1. #2 from the last sixth race,
2. #3 from the last sixth race,
3. the second one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
4. the third one from the race with the Gold medal winner from the first five races,
5. the second one from the race with the one which took the silver in the sixth race

Race 7: these five horse: first and second in this one will have the silver and bronze among all 25.

Good Q. +1

Hi Bunnel,

Is this a GMAT-kind question?

No, I don't think so.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 9

Re: On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2013, 13:55
It is also possible that one group could be made up of all the fastest horses well another group could have the slowest horse. In this case, the selection of #1's from the first five races is distorted.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 464
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 58

Re: On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2013, 01:50
Isn't it possible to make just one race?
All the horses run the same track, and after 5 races we can get the results for all horses.
Now we can just choose based on the timing the top 3 fastest horses.....
Why is this wrong?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36540
Followers: 7072

Kudos [?]: 93033 [0], given: 10541

Re: On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2013, 01:53
ronr34 wrote:
Isn't it possible to make just one race?
All the horses run the same track, and after 5 races we can get the results for all horses.
Now we can just choose based on the timing the top 3 fastest horses.....
Why is this wrong?

On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at a time...
_________________
Re: On a race track a maximum of 5 horses can race together at   [#permalink] 21 Sep 2013, 01:53

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In a horse race, the winning horse's nose crosses the finish line 6 3 16 Jan 2017, 08:32
4 On a track for remote controlled racing cars 5 14 Nov 2016, 06:34
11 In a horse race, horse A runs clockwise 5 08 May 2014, 08:40
2 Goldenrod and No Hope are in a horse race with 6 contestants 16 12 Jul 2011, 01:11
34 Goldenrod and No Hope are in a horse race with 6 contestants 18 10 Aug 2009, 19:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by