Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 26 Aug 2016, 23:59

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 7
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Yale '14 (II)
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 32 [3] , given: 6

On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Feb 2012, 14:32
3
KUDOS
32
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:45) correct 33% (00:44) wrong based on 769 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

(1) xyz < 0
(2) xy < 0
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 34449
Followers: 6273

Kudos [?]: 79596 [27] , given: 10022

Re: Does z lie between x and y on a number line? [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Feb 2012, 16:21
27
KUDOS
Expert's post
29
This post was
BOOKMARKED
jj97cornell wrote:
On a number line the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on a number line?

(1) xyz < 0
(2) xy < 0

On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

The distance between x and y is greater than the distance between $$x$$ and $$z$$, means that we can have one of the following four scenarios:
A. y--------z--x (YES case);
B. x--z--------y (YES case);
C. y--------x--z (NO case);
D. z--x--------y (NO case)'

The question asks whether we have scenarios A or B ($$z$$ lies between $$x$$ and $$y$$).

(1) $$xyz <0$$ --> either all three are negative or any two are positive and the third one is negative. If we place zero between $$y$$ and $$z$$ in case A (making $$y$$ negative and $$x$$, $$z$$ positive), then the answer would be YES but if we place zero between $$y$$ and $$x$$ in case C, then the answer would be NO. Not sufficient.

(2) $$xy<0$$ --> $$x$$ and $$y$$ have opposite signs. The same here: We can place zero between $$y$$ and $$x$$ in case A and the answer would be YES but we can also place zero between $$y$$ and $$x$$ in case C and the answer would be NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Both case A (answer YES) and case C (answer NO) satisfy the statements. Not sufficient.

A. y----0----z--x (YES case) --> $$xyz<0$$ and $$xy<0$$;
C. y----0----x--z (NO case) --> $$xyz<0$$ and $$xy<0$$.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Manager
Status: Employed
Joined: 17 Nov 2011
Posts: 100
Location: Pakistan
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.2
WE: Business Development (Internet and New Media)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 121 [8] , given: 10

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Feb 2012, 16:36
8
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
1. Statement 1 tells us that $$xyz<0$$

Which basically means that either all 3 are negative or one of them is negative. We can draw two scenarios of a number line where z is between $$x$$ and $$y$$ and where $$z$$ is on the right of $$x$$ and $$y$$ on the left of $$x$$ and maintain the condition that all three are negative. Hence Insufficient.

2. Statement 2 tells us that $$xy<0$$

Which basically means that either $$x$$ is negative or $$y$$ is negative. No statement about $$z$$ so obviously insufficient.

Now together we know that if either $$x$$ or $$y$$ are negative, and one of them is positive, $$z$$ has to be positive. So again we draw two scenarios on the number line and we find that two cases are possible, one where $$z$$ is in the middle and one where it is not. Hence both statements combined are insufficient as well.

Answer. E .. I am attaching a diagram to illustrate.

[img]
Attachment:
Number%20Line.jpg
[/img]
Attachments

Number Line.jpg [ 105.17 KiB | Viewed 43834 times ]

_________________

"Nowadays, people know the price of everything, and the value of nothing." Oscar Wilde

Last edited by omerrauf on 03 Feb 2012, 17:04, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

On the number line, the distance between x and y [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jan 2013, 23:15
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

(1) xyz<0
(2) xy<0
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 34449
Followers: 6273

Kudos [?]: 79596 [0], given: 10022

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jan 2013, 04:14
kiyo0610 wrote:
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

(1) xyz<0
(2) xy<0

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above.
_________________
Current Student
Joined: 18 May 2013
Posts: 41
Concentration: Real Estate, Finance
GMAT 1: 660 Q V
GPA: 3.73
WE: Analyst (Real Estate)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Oct 2013, 14:28
omerrauf wrote:
1. Statement 1 tells us that $$xyz<0$$

Which basically means that either all 3 are negative or one of them is negative. We can draw two scenarios of a number line where z is between $$x$$ and $$y$$ and where $$z$$ is on the right of $$x$$ and $$y$$ on the left of $$x$$ and maintain the condition that all three are negative. Hence Insufficient.

2. Statement 2 tells us that $$xy<0$$

Which basically means that either $$x$$ is negative or $$y$$ is negative. No statement about $$z$$ so obviously insufficient.

Now together we know that if either $$x$$ or $$y$$ are negative, and one of them is positive, $$z$$ has to be positive. So again we draw two scenarios on the number line and we find that two cases are possible, one where $$z$$ is in the middle and one where it is not. Hence both statements combined are insufficient as well.

Answer. E .. I am attaching a diagram to illustrate.

[img]
Attachment:
Number%20Line.jpg
[/img]

Thanks for the diagram. I selected C mostly because I was unsure how to handle both statements together. I clearly see it now
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 291

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2013, 02:12
Bunuel, I have a question. Among the 4 cases why are C & D a "no case".
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 34449
Followers: 6273

Kudos [?]: 79596 [2] , given: 10022

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2013, 03:25
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
mohnish104 wrote:
Bunuel, I have a question. Among the 4 cases why are C & D a "no case".

Because in cases C and D z does not lie between x and y. Remember that the questions asks whether z lies between x and y on a number line.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 59
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GPA: 3.87
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 1

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2013, 21:41
Bunuel, couldn't it also be possible that the variables are arranged so x is between z and y? For example z->x->y, instead of only x->y->z? It's kind of an incidental point because I got it right, but I want to make sure I am figuring it up the proper way.

Also, when the statements xyz or xy, is that to say how the numbers are located with reference to zero, or is it saying to multiply the numbers?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 34449
Followers: 6273

Kudos [?]: 79596 [0], given: 10022

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Oct 2013, 01:40
Stoneface wrote:
Bunuel, couldn't it also be possible that the variables are arranged so x is between z and y? For example z->x->y, instead of only x->y->z? It's kind of an incidental point because I got it right, but I want to make sure I am figuring it up the proper way.

Also, when the statements xyz or xy, is that to say how the numbers are located with reference to zero, or is it saying to multiply the numbers?

We know that the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. This can happen in 4 ways, shown in my post. You can see there that x CAN be between z and y in cases C and D.

As for xyz it means x*y*z.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 291
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 46

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2014, 02:17
Bunuel wrote:
jj97cornell wrote:
On a number line the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on a number line?

(1) xyz < 0
(2) xy < 0

On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

The distance between x and y is greater than the distance between $$x$$ and $$z$$, means that we can have one of the following four scenarios:
A. y--------z--x (YES case);
B. x--z--------y (YES case);
C. y--------x--z (NO case);
D. z--x--------y (NO case)'

The question asks whether we have scenarios A or B ($$z$$ lies between $$x$$ and $$y$$).

(1) $$xyz <0$$ --> either all three are negative or any two are positive and the third one is negative. If we place zero between $$y$$ and $$z$$ in case A (making $$y$$ negative and $$x$$, $$z$$ positive), then the answer would be YES but if we place zero between $$y$$ and $$x$$ in case C, then the answer would be NO. Not sufficient.

(2) $$xy<0$$ --> $$x$$ and $$y$$ have opposite signs. The same here: We can place zero between $$y$$ and $$x$$ in case A and the answer would be YES but we can also place zero between $$y$$ and $$x$$ in case C and the answer would be NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Both case A (answer YES) and case C (answer NO) satisfy the statements. Not sufficient.

A. y----0----z--x (YES case) --> $$xyz<0$$ and $$xy<0$$;
C. y----0----x--z (NO case) --> $$xyz<0$$ and $$xy<0$$.

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel while combining both a and b , can't we say that now out of x,y and z only one can be negative and out of x and y only one can be negative. Thus z has to be positive.
Now based on this understanding and which of x or y is negative , we notice that we can still not determine the answer. Hence insufficient
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2013
Posts: 137
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 125

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Oct 2014, 20:51
Hi Bunuel,
I could not follow No case for these 2 cases
C. y--------x--z (NO case);
D. z--x--------y (NO case)'

you responded to this question already that Z lies between x and Y . But that is the question stem. so I thought to consider those cases as well. Am i missing anything?

Bunuel wrote:
jj97cornell wrote:
On a number line the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on a number line?

(1) xyz < 0
(2) xy < 0

On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

The distance between x and y is greater than the distance between $$x$$ and $$z$$, means that we can have one of the following four scenarios:
A. y--------z--x (YES case);
B. x--z--------y (YES case);
C. y--------x--z (NO case);
D. z--x--------y (NO case)'

The question asks whether we have scenarios A or B ($$z$$ lies between $$x$$ and $$y$$).

(1) $$xyz <0$$ --> either all three are negative or any two are positive and the third one is negative. If we place zero between $$y$$ and $$z$$ in case A (making $$y$$ negative and $$x$$, $$z$$ positive), then the answer would be YES but if we place zero between $$y$$ and $$x$$ in case C, then the answer would be NO. Not sufficient.

(2) $$xy<0$$ --> $$x$$ and $$y$$ have opposite signs. The same here: We can place zero between $$y$$ and $$x$$ in case A and the answer would be YES but we can also place zero between $$y$$ and $$x$$ in case C and the answer would be NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Both case A (answer YES) and case C (answer NO) satisfy the statements. Not sufficient.

A. y----0----z--x (YES case) --> $$xyz<0$$ and $$xy<0$$;
C. y----0----x--z (NO case) --> $$xyz<0$$ and $$xy<0$$.

Hope it's clear.

_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kindly press +1 Kudos if my post helped you in any way

Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2015
Posts: 99
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 2.3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 6

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Sep 2015, 08:02
Hi Bunuel, does the case x---z----------y also satisfy both conditions?

with zero between x and z, we have -++, which is negative, and which contains differing signs for x & y.
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 1672
GPA: 3.82
Followers: 114

Kudos [?]: 938 [0], given: 0

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Sep 2015, 09:50
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem.
Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

(1) xyz < 0
(2) xy < 0

In the original condition we have 3 variables (x,y,z) and 1 equation ( the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z.). We need 2 more equations to match the number of variables and equations, and since there is 1 each in 1) and 2), C has high probabilty of being the answer.

Using both 1) & 2) together we have x=-1, y=2, z=0 which gives us answer yes, while z=-2, x=-1, y=2 gives us answer no. Therefore the conditions are not sufficient and the answer is E.

Normally for cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with 2 variable, or 3 variables and 1 equation, or 4 variables and 2 equations, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore C has a high chance of being the answer, which is why we attempt to solve the question using 1) and 2) together. Here, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the key questions. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer according to DS definition, we solve the question assuming C would be our answer hence using ) and 2) together. (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
_________________

MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
Find a 10% off coupon code for GMAT Club members.
Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself

Intern
Joined: 08 Feb 2016
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 12

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Apr 2016, 06:18
Using (I) and (II) alone, it is easy to figure that each statement alone is not sufficient.

Combining (I) and (II), we have xyz < 0 and xy < 0, this implies that z is positive
(if z is negative then xyz is > 0 [since xy < 0 as per (II)] and xyz > 0 violates (I). Hence z cannot be negative).
When combining (I) and (II) we can take two cases
x is -ve or y is -ve [both cannot have the same sign as this violates (II)].

We will have the below 3 cases for x is -ve and y is -ve. No single solution exists and hence both together not sufficient. Answer is E.

Thanks
Attachments

z between x and y.jpg [ 47.42 KiB | Viewed 5615 times ]

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater   [#permalink] 20 Apr 2016, 06:18
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
On the number line, what is the distance between the point 2x and the 2 14 Jan 2016, 12:34
13 What is the distance between x and y on the number line? 11 25 Mar 2012, 18:30
1 Distance between x and y is greater than distance between x 5 18 May 2011, 15:18
9 On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater 7 10 May 2010, 09:34
29 On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater 8 01 Nov 2006, 23:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by