Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

xyz < 0. All this tells us that either one or three of the numbers is negative and none of them are zero.

So, you can have x = 1, y = 8, z = -3, where the distance between XY is greater than the distance between XZ. Here, z does not lie between x and y.

But you can also have x = -1, y = -8, z = -3, where the distance between XY is greater than the distance between XZ, but where z lies between the two on the number line. Insufficient.

Statement 2:

xy < 0

All this tells us is that either x or y is negative and neither is zero. Taking x = -1, y = 8, z = -3, where the distance between XY is greater than the distance between XZ. Here, z does not lie between them on the number line.

But, taking x = 1, y = -8, z = -3, you fulfill the distance requirement and z falls between x and y on the number line. Insufficient.

Both Statements:

Taking both statements together, we learn that either x or y is negative and everything else is positive. Taking x = -1, y = 8, z = 2, we find that z lies between the points on the number line and fulfills the distance requirement. However, taking x = 8, y = -1, z = 10, z no longer lies between the two points but XY is still greater than XZ. Still insufficient.

xyz < 0. All this tells us that either one or three of the numbers is negative and none of them are zero.

So, you can have x = 1, y = 8, z = -3, where the distance between XY is greater than the distance between XZ. Here, z does not lie between x and y.

But you can also have x = -1, y = -8, z = -3, where the distance between XY is greater than the distance between XZ, but where z lies between the two on the number line. Insufficient.

Statement 2:

xy < 0

All this tells us is that either x or y is negative and neither is zero. Taking x = -1, y = 8, z = -3, where the distance between XY is greater than the distance between XZ. Here, z does not lie between them on the number line.

But, taking x = 1, y = -8, z = -3, you fulfill the distance requirement and z falls between x and y on the number line. Insufficient.

Both Statements:

Taking both statements together, we learn that either x or y is negative and everything else is positive. Taking x = -1, y = 8, z = 2, we find that z lies between the points on the number line and fulfills the distance requirement. However, taking x = 8, y = -1, z = 10, z no longer lies between the two points but XY is still greater than XZ. Still insufficient.

So, answer E.

Thanks for your detailed explanations, very helpful and yes the OE is E

Bunuel, the expert, is there a better way to solve this problem. I just took the Prep test and took me a long time to test each number. Is theer a quicker way to do this?

Bunuel, the expert, is there a better way to solve this problem. I just took the Prep test and took me a long time to test each number. Is theer a quicker way to do this?

This is a hard problem. Below is another way of solving it:

On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

The distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z, means that we can have one of the following four scenarios: A. y--------z--x (YES case) B. x--z--------y (YES case) C. y--------x--z (NO case) D. z--x--------y (NO case)

The question asks whether we have scenarios A or B (z lie between x and y ).

(1) xyz <0 --> either all three are negative or any two are positive and the third one is negative. We can place zero between y and z in case A (making y negative and x, z positive), then the answer would be YES or we can place zero between y and x in case C, then the answer would be NO. Not sufficient.

(2) xy<0 --> x and y have opposite signs. The same here: We can place zero between y and x in case A, then the answer would be YES or we can place zero between y and x in case C, then the answer would be NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Cases A (answer YES) and case C (answer NO) both work even if we take both statement together, so insufficient.

A. y----0----z--x (YES case) --> xyz<0 and xy<0; C. y----0----x--z (NO case) --> xyz<0 and xy<0

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jan 2013, 03:24

4

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

Best technique is to draw and visualize their positions in the numberline...

1. xyz < 0 Try x and y and z as all negative... <---(z)---x--(z)---y-----0------------>

Just this scenario is already giving us two possibilities... INSUFFICIENT

2. xy < 0 This means x and y has opposite signs...

<----(z)---x--(z)--0-------y------>

Just this scenario is already giving us two possibilities... INSUFFICIENT

Now, let us combine... If x and y has opposite signs then for xyz to be negative z must be positive...

scenario 1: <---------x-----0-(z)-------y--------------> YES z is in between scenario 2: <---------y-----0-----(z)-------x------(z)-------> NO z is not in between

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Apr 2014, 20:29

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Aug 2015, 19:07

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Sep 2016, 14:02

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...