|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 9
|
Once at a conference on the philosophy of language, a [#permalink]
 14 Feb 2009, 21:46
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Once at a conference on the philosophy of language, a professor delivered a lengthy and tiresome address the central thesis of which was that “yes” and related slang words such as “yeah” can be used only to show agreement with a proposition. At the end of the paper, a listener in the back of the auditorium stood up and shouted in a sarcastic voice, “Oh, yeah?” This constituted a complete refutation of the paper. The listener argued against the paper by (A) offering a counter-example (B) pointing out an inconsistency (C) presenting an analogy (D) attacking the speaker’s character (E) citing additional evidence Pls explain
_________________
Thanks
rampuria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 842
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 0
|
B?
weird question
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 205
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
rampuria wrote: Once at a conference on the philosophy of
language, a professor delivered a lengthy
and tiresome address the central thesis of
which was that “yes” and related slang
words such as “yeah” can be used only to
show agreement with a proposition. At
the end of the paper, a listener in the back
of the auditorium stood up and shouted in
a sarcastic voice, “Oh, yeah?” This constituted
a complete refutation of the paper.
The listener argued against the paper by
(A) offering a counter-example - oh yeah in a sarcastic way is not a counter example.
(B) pointing out an inconsistency - there is no inconcistenct given in the passage
(C) presenting an analogy - analogy can't refute the paper.
(D) attacking the speaker’s character
(E) citing additional evidence - no additional evidence given by listener.
Pls explain D The listener argued against by attacking the speaker's character. lengthy and tiresome address the central thesis - clearly says the professors character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 106
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 2
|
in for A
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1304
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
58
[0], given: 0
|
A rampuria wrote: Once at a conference on the philosophy of
language, a professor delivered a lengthy
and tiresome address the central thesis of
which was that “yes” and related slang
words such as “yeah” can be used only to
show agreement with a proposition. At
the end of the paper, a listener in the back
of the auditorium stood up and shouted in
a sarcastic voice, “Oh, yeah?” This constituted
a complete refutation of the paper.
The listener argued against the paper by
(A) offering a counter-example
(B) pointing out an inconsistency
(C) presenting an analogy
(D) attacking the speaker’s character
(E) citing additional evidence
Pls explain
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 263
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 9
|
ritula wrote: A rampuria wrote: Once at a conference on the philosophy of
language, a professor delivered a lengthy
and tiresome address the central thesis of
which was that “yes” and related slang
words such as “yeah” can be used only to
show agreement with a proposition. At
the end of the paper, a listener in the back
of the auditorium stood up and shouted in
a sarcastic voice, “Oh, yeah?” This constituted
a complete refutation of the paper.
The listener argued against the paper by
(A) offering a counter-example
(B) pointing out an inconsistency
(C) presenting an analogy
(D) attacking the speaker’s character
(E) citing additional evidence
Pls explain RITULA, WHY NOT B?
_________________
Thanks
rampuria
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 432
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 4
|
In for B
I don't see any 'counter example' but I see an inconsistency. In the beginning the argument states that 'yeah' can be used only to show agreement with.... At the end the listener says the same word 'yeah' to mean something else
Am I missing something?......(Don't tell me Oh yeah!)
Cheers,
Unplugged
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1304
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
58
[0], given: 0
|
Well, i chose A for the following reasons: The professor conveyed that yeah and yes can be used only to agreement. But since the listenerd sarcastically 'oh yeah', he wanted to say that i dnt agree with u still im saying 'yeah'. so he gave a counter example where these two words are used interchangeably even in disagreement. I think the usage of 'sarcastic' conveys this. This was my interpretation. Rest let us c wht does the OA say. rampuria wrote: ritula wrote: A rampuria wrote: Once at a conference on the philosophy of
language, a professor delivered a lengthy
and tiresome address the central thesis of
which was that “yes” and related slang
words such as “yeah” can be used only to
show agreement with a proposition. At
the end of the paper, a listener in the back
of the auditorium stood up and shouted in
a sarcastic voice, “Oh, yeah?” This constituted
a complete refutation of the paper.
The listener argued against the paper by
(A) offering a counter-example
(B) pointing out an inconsistency
(C) presenting an analogy
(D) attacking the speaker’s character
(E) citing additional evidence
Pls explain RITULA, WHY NOT B? |
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1442
Followers: 28
Kudos [?]:
153
[0], given: 1
|
ritula wrote: Well, i chose A for the following reasons:
The professor conveyed that yeah and yes can be used only to agreement. But since the listenerd sarcastically 'oh yeah', he wanted to say that i dnt agree with u still im saying 'yeah'. so he gave a counter example where these two words are used interchangeably even in disagreement. I think the usage of 'sarcastic' conveys this.
This was my interpretation. Rest let us c wht does the OA say. After getting rid off C,D,E, it is about letting one of A/B go. “yes” and related slang words such as “yeah” can be used only to show agreement with a proposition a listener in the back of the auditorium stood up and shouted in a sarcastic voice, “Oh, yeah?” This constituted a complete refutation of the paper Refuation means disagreement not just pointing out a flaw. Also he uses yeah with oh! which is an exclamation and not a preposition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 432
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 4
|
Can we have the OA pls?
Cheers,
Unplugged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 244
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
rampuria wrote: ritula wrote: A rampuria wrote: Once at a conference on the philosophy of
language, a professor delivered a lengthy
and tiresome address the central thesis of
which was that “yes” and related slang
words such as “yeah” can be used only to
show agreement with a proposition. At
the end of the paper, a listener in the back
of the auditorium stood up and shouted in
a sarcastic voice, “Oh, yeah?” This constituted
a complete refutation of the paper.
The listener argued against the paper by
(A) offering a counter-example
(B) pointing out an inconsistency
(C) presenting an analogy
(D) attacking the speaker’s character
(E) citing additional evidence
Pls explain RITULA, WHY NOT B? c,d,e can not be an answer. Now, between A and B: The listener is not suggesting that the professor's argument is inconsistent. What is the inconsistency. The listener does not agree and hence sarcastically asks oh yeah? This refutes the professor's argument that yeah can only be used to agree with a proposition. Hence, the listener offers a counter example and refutes the professor's premise.
_________________
-----------------------
tusharvk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 775
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
33
[0], given: 99
|
IMO A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 1003
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
40
[0], given: 5
|
What's the OA and the source please? Some of these questions are just strange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 320
Location: Hungary
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 3
|
My answer is A. He points out a counter-example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 119
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
50
[0], given: 0
|
It is obviously A, and this is obviously an LSAT question or an imitation of an LSAT question. The professor's claim was that "yes", "yeah" and so on can ONLY be used to indicate agreement with a proposition. That's "proposition", meaning "claim" or "statement", not "preposition", which is a grammatical term. Note that this is a universal if-then claim: If anyone uses the words "yes", "yeah", etc. he or she is necessarily indicating agreement with a statement. Note that the claim is universal, with NO exceptions for tone of voice, context, etc. The listener clearly used "yeah", and was clearly indicating DISagreement. This is a counterexample: The claim says it cannot happen, but it did. Because the claim was universal, one counterexample is enough to refute it completely. It is certainly not (B). There was no inconsistency in the professor's argument. It was internally consistent; it consists of a single if-then statement which does not contradict itself. It just happened to be wrong, as the counterexample proves.
_________________
Grumpy
Kaplan Canada LSAT/GMAT/GRE teacher and tutor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 288
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 0
|
Babu Rampuria, it's time for the OA...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 39
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 4
|
Vote for (A), too.
Still waiting for the OA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 317
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
33
[0], given: 13
|
+1 for A. He used an exclamation to show the counter example and he did not show any inconsistency in using the thesis with prepositions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 853
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
127
[0], given: 106
|
agree with a
_________________
Consider kudos for the good post ... 
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 55
Location: Washington DC
Schools: Kellogs, Darden, Stern, Tepper
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 15
|
IMO - A, what is the official answer?
_________________
Give and Take Kudos! if you are benefitted from a post!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar
Topics:
|
 |
|
|
Once at a conference on the philosophy of language, a
|
Paul |
11 |
26 Mar 2004, 13:48 |
 |
|
|
At a conference on the origins of language, the complexity
|
Balvinder |
8 |
30 May 2007, 05:44 |
|
|
|
|
At a conference on the origins of language, the complexity
|
vshaunak@gmail.com |
3 |
25 Jun 2007, 04:13 |
|
|
|
|
At a conference on the origins of language, complexity of
|
rishi2377 |
4 |
29 Sep 2007, 07:02 |
|
|
|
|
Over time, phrases in the English language that were once
|
Chetangupta |
6 |
05 Jul 2011, 06:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|
close
