Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Aug 2014, 14:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

One can be at home and be in the backyard, that is, not in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
One can be at home and be in the backyard, that is, not in [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2005, 17:43
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
One can be at home and be in the backyard, that is, not in one's house at all. One call also be in one's house but not at home, if one owns the house but rents it out to others, for example. So one's being at home is not required for one's being in one's own house.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship between the argument's conclusion and its claim that one can be at home without being in one's house?

A) The claim is required to establish the conclusion
B) The claim represents the point the conclusion is intended to refute.
C) The claim is compatible with the truth or falsity of the conclusion
D) The claim points out an ambiguity in the phrase "at home"
E) The claim is inadvertently contradicts the conclusion.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 870
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jun 2005, 09:47
Is it D

Claim: House + Backyard = Home

Conclusion: Own house + (Backyard) = Home
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 92
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 30 Jun 2005, 10:19
agree with D. that's what they are trying to do i.e. to say that "at home" is a vague statement
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2005, 15:38
Bumping up this thread for more participation
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2005, 19:54
i'll go with E
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2005, 05:07
I 'll go with C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2005, 16:55
anyone else .....
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 6
Location: Hong Kong
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2005, 00:23
D for me.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2005, 00:52
What's the OA? Neone?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2005, 06:35
A = One being at home
B = One being inside one's house

Claim states that A can happen with or without B

Conclusion states that A is not required for B to be true.

To me the claim is just a rewording of the conclusion. Because if the conclusion is true, then the claim is true. If the conclusion is false, then B => A negating the claim.

C would be my choice.

We can also eliminate the other choices:

A is false because the claim is not necessary at all to make the conclusion, it is just a rephrased conclusion.

B is clearly false

D is false because, there is no word-play here

E is also false
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2005, 10:23
AJB77 wrote:
A = One being at home
B = One being inside one's house

Claim states that A can happen with or without B

Conclusion states that A is not required for B to be true.

To me the claim is just a rewording of the conclusion. Because if the conclusion is true, then the claim is true. If the conclusion is false, then B => A negating the claim.

C would be my choice.

We can also eliminate the other choices:

A is false because the claim is not necessary at all to make the conclusion, it is just a rephrased conclusion.

B is clearly false

D is false because, there is no word-play here

E is also false


AJB, I have a couple of follow up questions:

You say that A can happen with or without B

From the passage content (1st line) we know that A can happen without B. However nothing is said about A can happen with B correct?

All we know is

A is not dependant on B
B is not dependant on A.

I just want to make sure that i havent missed anything.

If the conclusion is negated, then we get A is required for B. If this were true, then like you said it contradicts the B !=> A paradigm. But the question just asks about the claim "one can be at home without being in one's house" [A !=> B]. So how is the claim compatible with the falsity of the conclusion? The claim has no effect on the 'falsity" on the conclusion. Ergo its "compatible"? Is that what AC C is saying?

BTW the OA is C. So you've nailed it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2005, 17:08
See, to be honest, I was not 100% sure of C, but I figured with confidence that the rest were definitely wrong and chose C, even if I was a bit shaky. Once I chose C, I tried to make an argument for it.

To me "X is compatible with truth and falsity of Y" means that (If Y -> X AND IF ~Y -> ~X)

X = "One's being at home is not required for one's being in one's own house."

~X = "One's being at home is required for one's being in one's own house." which NEGATES the claim "One can be at home and not be in one's house at all"
  [#permalink] 05 Jul 2005, 17:08
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Carlotta can drive from her home to her office by one of two seabhi 3 24 Feb 2014, 05:26
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Can a stay-at-home mom get into a top B school lahai1dj 2 20 Dec 2012, 08:53
Home security is blossoming for toy makers that can match getgyan 2 03 Oct 2012, 20:13
2 homes ritula 1 08 Feb 2009, 23:11
In the game of Funball, each batter can either hit a home vij101 1 29 Jul 2006, 21:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

One can be at home and be in the backyard, that is, not in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.