One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 05:28

# STARTING SOON:

Live Chat with Admission Manager and Current Student of NUS SIngapore - Join Chat Room to Participate.

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 37
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 12

One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 00:59
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (02:10) correct 31% (01:27) wrong based on 364 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous import and export of the same items, a phenomenon
known as “redundant trade.” In California, for example, domestic cherries are exported to Canada and Japan,
while a nearly equivalent number of cherries are imported from Chile, Italy, and Germany. California also exports
and imports nearly identical amounts of lettuce and almonds. Although shipping fresh fruits and vegetables is an
expensive undertaking, there is a justifiable economic rationale for redundant trade.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion above?

• Undertaking free trade with one’s political allies helps to maintain international goodwill.
• In recent years, consumers in California boycotted domestic cherries, demanding better working conditions for agricultural laborers in the state.
• Local growers could sell their products at a premium in domestic markets.
• The economic globalization of redundant trade allows for the sharing of cultural norms and values.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 37
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 12

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 01:06
Experts, can you please tell me why option 'C' is incorrect.

The conclusion states that Although shipping fresh fruits and vegetables is an expensive undertaking, there is a justifiable economic rationale for redundant trade.

C: In recent years, consumers in California boycotted domestic cherries, demanding better working conditions for agricultural laborers in the state.
If this is the case then, it means that there is no market for these cherries in California and hence the producers are exporting them to other countries. This way they can at least make some money instead of letting all the produce go unsold in California. In my opinion, This justifies the economic rationale and hence should support the argument.

I have a good reason why the OA could be incorrect. But I'd like to hear an expert's opinion first before posting further comments.

Thanks
Turtle
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3089
Followers: 783

Kudos [?]: 6524 [0], given: 1012

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 03:58
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous import and export of the same items, a phenomenon

Ok a fact. Information

In California, for example, domestic cherries are exported to Canada and Japan,
while a nearly equivalent number of cherries are imported from Chile, Italy, and Germany. California also exports
and imports nearly identical amounts of lettuce and almonds.

An example HOW redundant trade works

Although shipping fresh fruits and vegetables is an
expensive undertaking, there is a justifiable economic rationale for redundant trade.

The conclusion states: though RT is expensive a positive side take place

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion above?

Correct. redundant trade could open other trade channels to access to other goods. In other words: RT helps to strengthen the linkages between firms, traders and so on to establish OTHER ctrade channels for other GOODS. Obtaining something else (is a strategy) toward RT

• Undertaking free trade with one’s political allies helps to maintain international goodwill.

International goodwill is out of scope. Here we are talking about strategy

• In recent years, consumers in California boycotted domestic cherries, demanding better working conditions for agricultural laborers in the state.

This is a good argument: better work conditions for worker. Unfortunately this is not related at all with the strategy to add new commercial channels to buy OTHER goods from other countries, more cheap

• Local growers could sell their products at a premium in domestic markets.

What is done into domestic market (local market, inside the nation) is out of scope

• The economic globalization of redundant trade allows for the sharing of cultural norms and values.

Culturals norms and so on......is not the point.

Hope this helps
_________________
Intern
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 37
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 12

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 04:12
In recent years, consumers in California boycotted domestic cherries, demanding better working conditions for agricultural laborers in the state.

This is a good argument: better work conditions for worker. Unfortunately this is not related at all with the strategy to add new commercial channels to buy OTHER goods from other countries, more cheap

MY RESPONSE
Question: Why should it be? As long as i see that there is an economic rationale, I shouldn't be worried about how that economic advantage is being achieved.

Another point about the OA (Yes, The OA is A): The OA merely states that "Establishing international ties through trade facilitates access to other desired goods that are more efficiently produced abroad."

facilitates access to goods that are more efficiently produced abroad. Now just because they are produced efficiently, there is no guarantee that importing them will be cheaper. What if the transportation costs are prohibitive? What if the import duty is obscene?

See, These are just possibilities which could be true. I am NOT saying they are true. I am merely pointing out the inherent weaknesses of this answer choice?

Am I clear?

Cheers
Turtle
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3089
Followers: 783

Kudos [?]: 6524 [0], given: 1012

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 07:05
When you try to strengthen or weaken an argument you do not do this only attacking the conclusion but the overall argument NEVER do only one thing. You have to understand what's going on, to understand the whole situation.

Infact: One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous import and export of the same items, a phenomenon

Although shipping fresh fruits and vegetables is an expensive undertaking, there is a justifiable economic rationale for redundant trade.

In recent years, consumers in California boycotted domestic cherries, demanding better working conditions for agricultural laborers in the state.

Is not related, if not far far far away from the real point.

This is how you have to attack CR. This exam work in that away. What you and I think is irrelevant if not for the argument at stake.

regards
_________________
Intern
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 37
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 12

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 08:41
I am sorry, I am unable to follow what you are saying !
Intern
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 37
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 12

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 10:06
Well carcass, I disagree with your logic that an answer choice should be rejected (in strengthen & weaken questions) if it 'seems' unrelated, in favor of a choice that is related.

More importantly. All weaken / Strengthen questions have a 'Fact - Conclusion' or a 'Fact-Reason' (a causes b type) relationship. One can never meddle with the facts i.e. one cannot strengthen or weaken a fact. One always needs to attack the conclusion.

And secondly, The questions I posted previously still remain unanswered

Cheers
Turtle
MBA Section Director
Status: On vacation...
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 3946
Location: India
City: Pune
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 392

Kudos [?]: 2880 [3] , given: 2159

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 10:21
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
Its A.

Analysis :- (Premise) redundant trade is one feature of global food economy. Its example is california imported x numbers of cherries from chile, italy, and germany while at the same time it exported nearly equal numbers of cherries - produced by it own - to canada and japan. The same thing happen with lettuce and almonds as well. (Counter Premise) exporting food products is an expensive undertaking, However (Conclusion) there is a justifiable rational for redundant trade.

Clearly we need to find that rational which encourages redundant trade. Any choice that focuses on other aspects of this practice such as price difference, quality difference in imported/exported products, consumers choices, social factors, political/diplomatic requirement would support the conclusion.

A) Correct. This choice states that such trade helps the government to establish international ties and with that it can have access to the commodities that are more efficiently produced in other countries. So this trade can be a political/diplomatic requirement.

C) This is a shell game answer. The consumers' boycott may be the reason for importing cherries, but what about lettuce and almonds? We want to know the rational behind redundant trade taking place everywhere. Consumers' boycott may only be the reason for such trade taking in california but it cant for trade taking place at other places/countries (NOTE that the stimulus is discussing global food economy, not that of california alone)

D) This choice weakens the argument

E) I am confused with this choice. Although I don’t find any strong reason to eliminate this, I will not go with it as long as Choice A is there. Because choice A provides the Monetary reason while this choice provides cultural reason.

Regards,

Abhijit.
_________________
Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 490
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 348

Kudos [?]: 1921 [2] , given: 82

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 10:27
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
StrivingTurtle wrote:
One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous import and export of the same items, a phenomenon
known as “redundant trade.” In California, for example, domestic cherries are exported to Canada and Japan,
while a nearly equivalent number of cherries are imported from Chile, Italy, and Germany. California also exports
and imports nearly identical amounts of lettuce and almonds. Although shipping fresh fruits and vegetables is an
expensive undertaking, there is a justifiable economic rationale for redundant trade.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion above?

• Undertaking free trade with one’s political allies helps to maintain international goodwill.
• In recent years, consumers in California boycotted domestic cherries, demanding better working conditions for agricultural laborers in the state.
• Local growers could sell their products at a premium in domestic markets.
• The economic globalization of redundant trade allows for the sharing of cultural norms and values.

Hi Turtle,

The conclusion asks for a justifiable economic rationale behind "redundant trade". So, you can easily eliminate the answer choices that present a non-economic rationale. (B), (C) and (E) present a non-economic rationale for conducting "redundant trade"

(B) Undertaking free trade with one’s political allies helps to maintain international goodwill.

International good will is not an economic benefit that a county can derive from "redundant trade". So, this will not strengthen our conclusion.

(C) In recent years, consumers in California boycotted domestic cherries, demanding better working conditions for agricultural laborers in the state.

This choice presents an issue of betterment of working conditions for agricultural laborers. Another non economic reason, betterment of conditions would be a more of an ethical issue than a economic issue.

(E) The economic globalization of redundant trade allows for the sharing of cultural norms and values.

This choice is a clear non-economic rationale, thus incorrect. In fact it is a cultural rationale.

(D) Local growers could sell their products at a premium in domestic markets.

This is an economic reason, so we can not reject this choice straight away. (D) is the most difficult to prove incorrect of all the incorrect answer choices. If local growers could sell their products at a higher price in domestic markets, then it means that they will get a lower price in foreign markets. Therefore "redundant trade" will not be so viable economically. In fact, (D) could easily be the answer to the question stem which asks for a "justifiable reason not to practice redundant trade"

Quote:
facilitates access to goods that are more efficiently produced abroad. Now just because they are produced efficiently, there is no guarantee that importing them will be cheaper. What if the transportation costs are prohibitive? What if the import duty is obscene?

When you say - "What if the transportation costs are prohibitive?" and "What if the import duty is obscene?", you are making additional assumptions. By this way we can make any choice a strengthener or a weakener

Note: While strengthening or weakening the argument you should prove that a choice is correct/ incorrect without making any additional assumptions

Using this logic, one could say that (E) is correct because, What if sharing cultural norms and values prevents war between countries, saving them lot of money, thus an economic rationale. But, this is not correct; we have made an extra assumption that "sharing cultural norms and values prevents war between countries".

Therefore, (A) is correct because it gives an economic rationale for using "redundant trade". Notice that we can prove this without making any additional assumptions.

I hope this clears your doubt,

Vercules
_________________

Intern
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 37
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 12

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 10:34
Vercules, Understood now !!

Thank you.
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3089
Followers: 783

Kudos [?]: 6524 [0], given: 1012

Re: Strengthen question (not too easy!!) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 11:45
StrivingTurtle wrote:
Vercules, Understood now !!

Thank you.

Well I do not see a huge different between my explanation and vercules's.

Quote:
Well carcass, I disagree with your logic that an answer choice should be rejected (in strengthen & weaken questions) if it 'seems' unrelated, in favor of a choice that is related.

In S or W questions you have to find an answer that is OR a bit more true respect the conclusion OR a bit less respect the conclusion and that S or W do not destroy the argument. So from this, a question that is not related to the conclusion OR the conclusion + the argument (i.e. the context) HOW could be the answer ?? This is still unclear for me.....

The most important thing, aside this fact, is that you understood. My personal opinion is that this test is better achiveable if we have notion of market, demand, elasticity, offer and so on.....after all is an exam for Business School.

regards
_________________
Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 3
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-15-2013
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 2

Re: One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2013, 08:30
I would just like to put a point why 'C' must be wrong option

C -In recent years, consumers in California boycotted domestic cherries, demanding better working conditions for agricultural laborers in the state.

"In California, for example, domestic cherries are exported to Canada and Japan,
while a nearly equivalent number of cherries are imported from Chile, Italy, and Germany." This is mentioned in the Question.

If people Boycott cherries then why would they import them from other countries..?

One might say they are boycotting domestic cherries for improving Labour conditions and hence are purchasing imported cherries, but that any way doesn't solve the cause why people abandon cherries.

Coming to the point raised on the economic gain of making money from cherries rather than wasting the produce - we are not talking about a particular year's produce when people started boycotting, rather both boycotting and production continued for few years - "In recent years, consumers in California boycotted domestic cherries,"

If we talk about the gains regarding improving labour conditions - this might not be an economic gain and not a rationale definitely for economic gain as was already explained above..!

I am sure you got this by now, but just to make it clear to someone who read this discussion.
Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 225
Location: India
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 34

Re: One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2013, 08:13
It is clearly A,

Why ? Because the argument says that there is a justifiable economic rationale behind the redundant trade.

Only option A fits the requirement.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10533
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2014, 17:03
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 163
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 73

Re: One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2016, 06:30
Option A it is ... good explanation by experts in the posts above !
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Re: One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous   [#permalink] 02 May 2016, 06:30
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
62 Zero CO2 economy - a tricky one 42 02 Sep 2013, 00:15
17 One feature of the global food economy is the simultaneous 22 06 Feb 2012, 22:16
21 Some experts warn that global warming will reduce food 21 05 Jun 2011, 08:17
3 One-year-olds ordinarily prefer the taste of sweet food to 11 31 Mar 2008, 04:20
One-year-olds ordinarily prefer the taste of sweet food to 4 24 Sep 2007, 14:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by