Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Oct 2014, 12:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

One form of reasoning holds that by eliminating all possible

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 0

One form of reasoning holds that by eliminating all possible [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2004, 11:43
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
One form of reasoning holds that by eliminating all possible explanations until only one remains, that one should be accepted. Critics argue that the flaw in this form of reasoning is that one cannot know about all possible explanations.

Which of the following examples best supports this criticism?
a) the possible causes of heart disease
b) the possible results of rolling dice
c) the possible family members who left the house unlocked
d) the possible candidates running for mayor of Atlanta, Georgia
e) the possible countries with nuclear weapons
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 187
Location: illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2004, 11:53
This is a very general type of question and by POE, I am down to A and E.
One can argue that there might be other countries that may be secretly having Nuclear Weapons (WMD's Like IRAQ :lol: )....and at the same time there might be some reason undetected by DOCTORS that might lead to heart disease...

Given that argument is talking about cause and effect kind of relationship, I will go for A...

Fingers crossed.

B) We know the Possible results of rolling Dice....
C)The possible member is ONE of the Family members.
D) We may know that
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 291
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2004, 11:54
Interesting Paul.........would pick E......also A is a good contender but B, C, D can be reasoned as knowing all the possibilities.......!!
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 21
Location: USA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2004, 12:01
My answer is E.
Till now the possible causes of heart disease are well defined.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2004, 12:41
I will go with E.

It is impossible to determine the intentions of the country. Whereas the all possible causes of hart attack can be know because heart does not have a mind of its own and scientists will eventually find all of them.
Then Again A could be right because of cause and effect relationship.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 28
Location: Texas
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2004, 13:10
The answer is A. There may be yet unknown heart diseases, not just the ones that we know the causes of today.

Say no to E. You can list all the countries in the world. This would be the list of all possible countries that could have nukes.

D is actually more interesting, depending on the requirements to run for mayor, the list of possible candidates could include every person on the planet but the list could still be made.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2004, 13:15
Jumbee wrote:
The answer is A. There may be yet unknown heart diseases, not just the ones that we know the causes of today.

Say no to E. You can list all the countries in the world. This would be the list of all possible countries that could have nukes.

D is actually more interesting, depending on the requirements to run for mayor, the list of possible candidates could include every person on the planet but the list could still be made.


:pray This was best explanation! OA is A
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2004, 13:15
I agree with Jumbee. E is wrong. Actually E is similar to C.

I support A now.
  [#permalink] 06 Apr 2004, 13:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Let T_n be the number of all possible triangles formed by arunspanda 1 26 Mar 2014, 05:17
According to Soren Kierkegaard, the reason to hold veenu08 3 27 Aug 2013, 20:18
2 A is a set holding only all possible solutions of x, and B Asifpirlo 5 06 Aug 2013, 11:15
13 Experts publish their posts in the topic Possible Reasons for Unexpected Verbal Scores VeritasPrepKarishma 11 23 Jul 2013, 22:00
One form of reasoning holds that by eliminating all possible sangarelli 11 03 Oct 2006, 00:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

One form of reasoning holds that by eliminating all possible

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.