Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 17:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

one's belief's

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

one's belief's [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 16:00
Ques from 1000CR doc

Some statisticians claim that the surest way to increase the overall correctness of the total set of oneтАЩs beliefs is: never change that set, except by rejecting a belief when given adequate evidence against it. However, if this were the only rule one followed, then whenever one were presented with any kind of evidence, one would have to either reject some of oneтАЩs beliefs or else leave oneтАЩs beliefs unchanged. But then, over time, one could only have fewer and fewer beliefs. Since we need many beliefs in order to survive, the statisticiansтАЩ claim must be mistaken.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

(A) presumes, without providing any justification, that the surest way of increasing the overall correctness of the total set of oneтАЩs beliefs must not hinder oneтАЩs ability to survive
(B) neglects the possibility that even while following the statisticiansтАЩ rule, one might also accept new beliefs when presented with some kinds of evidence
(C) overlooks the possibility that some large sets of beliefs are more correct overall than are some small sets of beliefs
(D) takes for granted that one should accept some beliefs related to survival even when given adequate evidence against them
(E) takes for granted that the beliefs we need in order to have many beliefs must all be correct beliefs
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 201
Location: Colombia, South America
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: one's belief's [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 16:16
hsgmat wrote:
Ques from 1000CR doc

Some statisticians claim that the surest way to increase the overall correctness of the total set of oneтАЩs beliefs is: never change that set, except by rejecting a belief when given adequate evidence against it. However, if this were the only rule one followed, then whenever one were presented with any kind of evidence, one would have to either reject some of oneтАЩs beliefs or else leave oneтАЩs beliefs unchanged. But then, over time, one could only have fewer and fewer beliefs. Since we need many beliefs in order to survive, the statisticiansтАЩ claim must be mistaken.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

(A) presumes, without providing any justification, that the surest way of increasing the overall correctness of the total set of oneтАЩs beliefs must not hinder oneтАЩs ability to survive
(B) neglects the possibility that even while following the statisticiansтАЩ rule, one might also accept new beliefs when presented with some kinds of evidence
(C) overlooks the possibility that some large sets of beliefs are more correct overall than are some small sets of beliefs
(D) takes for granted that one should accept some beliefs related to survival even when given adequate evidence against them
(E) takes for granted that the beliefs we need in order to have many beliefs must all be correct beliefs



Is this a weakening argument type?

if yes I would go with B
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2005
Posts: 33
Location: Toronto, ON
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 16:16
I'm gonna go with B.

The statisticians claim never said anything about notbeing able to add new beliefs.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1126
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 17:40
a little strange at the begining but if you just stick to the stem it seems it is a clear B

- never change that set, except by rejecting a belief when given adequate evidence against it.
- But then, over time, one could only have fewer and fewer beliefs.
- Since we need many beliefs in order to survive, the statisticiansтАЩ claim must be mistaken.

B is the only answer that explain a way to accept new beliefs so that you will always have many beliefs and therefore survive.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 405
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2005, 20:11
hsgmat,

Your questions are hurting my brain. =). The scope shift occurs in the last statement.

a) Out of scope
b) No
c) Out of scope
d) No

I believe the answer should be E. In order for the argument to be viable, the original beliefs must be all correct.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 254
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 12:00
B !

This ensures that the persons beliefs are not axhausted as per the stat. argument.

Please post OA !
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 13:52
B it is.
_________________

hey ya......

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 14:13
OA is A. No explanation provided.

While I had taken the test I had chosen B. The argument states that one needs MANY beliefs to survive. 'B' shows the possibility that one can add new beliefs..
  [#permalink] 02 Nov 2005, 14:13
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Greek tragedy, one of the enduring pillars of our belief GetThisDone 19 28 Apr 2012, 21:35
3 Greek tragedy, one of the enduring pillars of our belief serbiano 9 28 Jan 2010, 00:07
4 For over 300 years, one of the most enduring beliefs among seofah 17 04 Jun 2009, 07:55
Greek tragedy, one of the enduring pillars of our belief AugiTh 4 23 Jul 2007, 12:45
It is a deep-rooted belief in the scholarly circles that one Praetorian 6 21 Jul 2005, 20:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

one's belief's

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.