One way for reducing commuting time for those who work in : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 10:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# One way for reducing commuting time for those who work in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 88
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

One way for reducing commuting time for those who work in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2003, 04:30
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

One way for reducing commuting time for those who work in the cities is to increase the speed at which traffic moves downtown. This can be accomplished by raising the tolls on the tunnels and bridges connecting the city with other communities. This will discourage auto traffic into the city and will encourage people to use public transportation instead.

Which of the following, if true, would LEAST weaken the argument above?

(A) Nearly all of the traffic in the center of the city is commerical traffic which will continue despite the toll increases
(B) Some people now driving alone into the city would choose to car pool with each other rather than use public transportation
(C) Any temporary improvement in traffic flow would be lost because the improvement itself would attract more cars
(D) The numbers of commuters who would be deterred by the toll increases would be insignificant
(E) The public transportation system is not able to handle any significant increase in the number of commuters using the system
If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 41
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2003, 04:41
Is the correct answer choice (B) ?
Only choice (B) voices the same opinion as the argument.
Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 88
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2003, 21:43

But what is the problem with E? it is doesn't weaken the argument also.
(I would say that is almost irrelevant to the argument).

Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 41
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2003, 21:57
If public tranportaion is not able to handle any significant increase in the number of commuters using the system, the commuters will be forced to use auto traffic. Hence the argument that commuters will be encouraged to use public transport thereby reducing traffic will not hold good. Hence, (E) weakens the argument considerably. As the question is trying to find the reason that would LEAST weaken the argument presented, (E) can not be the correct response.

Hope this helps.
Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 88
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2003, 23:17
Thanks a lot!

I've just misunderstood the question!
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5238
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2006, 04:28
Hint: LEAST WEAKEN = MOST STRENGTHEN.

(B) simply does it the best
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2006, 06:13
Yup B...
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 330
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2006, 07:30
And y not (C) .
Director
Joined: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 720
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2006, 08:02
sangarelli wrote:
And y not (C) .

raising the tolls on the tunnels and bridges connecting the city with other communities will discourage auto traffic into the city and will encourage people to use public transportation instead But improvement in traffic flow would be lost because the improvement itself would attract more cars Argument is weakened
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 5
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2006, 13:30
Yeah, I agree with B, because at first I thought that the question was asking what would most weaken the argument, and I crossed B off first. So, when I realized what the question was asking, I had to pick B, as it doesn't really weaken the argument at all.
21 Aug 2006, 13:30
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 2 16 Feb 2012, 18:03
1 Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 6 04 Dec 2011, 18:38
1 Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 14 02 Sep 2011, 04:57
3 Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 16 16 Aug 2010, 12:55
11 Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 33 22 May 2010, 02:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by