Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 May 2016, 12:29
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 164
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 69

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2012, 00:25
Answer is provided by many guys appropriately. Just trying to explain the difference between usage of fewer and less.

Fewer:
Fewer is used with countable nouns: people, animals, chairs, shoes.

1.You know fewer people than I do.
2.There should be fewer books on the table.
3.I have fewer ideas than everyone else.
4.Fewer of us show up each year.



Less
Less is used for uncountable, usually abstract nouns: money, happiness, snow, idealism.

1.I hope less snow falls this year.
2.We need more money and less debt.
3.I have less computer savvy than you.
4.You should spend less of your time complaining.


Less is also used with adjectives and adverbs:

1.I'm less happy than I used to be.
2.He runs less quickly than you.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 464
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V0
GPA: 3.23
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 350 [0], given: 11

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2013, 00:43
Ankit04041987 wrote:
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.

A. movies—less than those
B. movies—fewer than have been
C. movies, which is less than those
D. movies, a number lower than the people
E. movies, fewer than the ones



Only seven HAVE BEEN KILLED by Animal A- less/fewer than HAVE BEEN by Animal B.

C,D and E are out because "which", "a number", "fewer" touch the movies. By touch rule, these phrases modify the movies. This is incorrect.
Now, we are left with A and B. We need to maintain parallelism and only B uses HAVE BEEN...

Answer: B
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1435
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 272

Kudos [?]: 1150 [0], given: 809

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2013, 05:08
Can someone throw some light on why E is wrong and when to use the touch rule of modifier ...
_________________

ISB Class of 2017 | ISB Preparation Kit
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ISB Class of 2016 | GMAT Retake Debrief
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ISB Class of 2015 | GMAT Debrief
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1123
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 169

Kudos [?]: 1700 [1] , given: 219

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2013, 06:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
ankurgupta03 wrote:
Can someone throw some light on why E is wrong and when to use the touch rule of modifier ...


There is a verb tense error in E

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.

B. movies—fewer than have been (killed)
E. movies, fewer than the ones (killed)

The touching rule is used for noun-modifiers and has only few exceptions:
1)parallel structure like
noun, which(touches the noun) .... and which (does not touch the noun, but is in a parallel structure)
2)noun with modifiers or prepositional phrases like
the car of the year (prep phrase) that won the championship(refers to the car even if it touches the noun "year")

At the moment I cannot remember any other case... hope this answers your question!
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 335
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 470 [0], given: 136

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2013, 08:23
Zarrolou wrote:
2)noun with modifiers or prepositional phrases like
the car of the year (prep phrase) that won the championship(refers to the car even if it touches the noun "year")

At the moment I cannot remember any other case... hope this answers your question!


Above Rule does have exceptions, and depends on the meaning of the sentence.
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2035
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q0 V
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 465 [0], given: 355

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2014, 18:41
anon1 wrote:
Vips0000 wrote:
So going by this logic, would you consider 'fish' as countable or uncountable? you can surely count fish but cant add S at the end (or if you do, it would be a blunder :-D )
I think MGMAT's strategy with this is best: just see if counting 1 , 2, 3 etc makes sense with it. eg. 1 bottle , 2 bottles, 3 bottles etc. or 1 fish, 2 fish, 3 fish.


Ah yes, that's a good way of thinking about it. You are the man Vips.


Shouldn't one close the dash?

Cheers!
J :)
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 124
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q41 V31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 137

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2014, 01:11
anon1 wrote:
I don't understand why "less' can't be used with people.

I don't consider people a count noun.

We don't say "peoples"

My definition of a "count noun" is a noun that can be plural by adding an S. Like Bottle. There are 5 water bottles here. Am I wrong?

For example, wine is non-count. How much less wine do you want?

I guess we do say, there are "5 people" here... but no S at the end.


Can someone chime in ?


When we say 5 people, we can count 5 people, can't we? :)
_________________

Its not over..

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1229
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 528

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2015, 07:09
by realizing the illogic elements in the answer choices, we can go to the OA.

but we should learn the usage in the oa and a problem arise.

what is the subject to the second part in oa?

we can not say that gmat oa is wrong but we should think that what we should learn from this oa.

the patterns presented by oa is editted many times by gmac persons and is worth learning.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2015
Posts: 110
Concentration: Real Estate, International Business
GMAT 1: 600 Q33 V40
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 3

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2016, 14:35
I simplified the sentence to, "Fewer people have been killed by the shark than been stings"
Although D still looked tempting but numbers can't get killed by sharks.

Then I had to pick between B+ E.

"fewer than the ones" is unclear as to who "the ones" are. Movies? Sharks? People?
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great   [#permalink] 20 Feb 2016, 14:35

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 29 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
25 Experts publish their posts in the topic Only seven people this century have been killed by the great stallone 35 25 Oct 2008, 16:43
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great mlchang616 5 23 Apr 2007, 00:51
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great GMAThopeful 10 27 Mar 2007, 10:28
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great KC 12 23 Oct 2006, 20:09
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great apollo168 12 04 Sep 2006, 23:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.