Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 22:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 85
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [2] , given: 29

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2012, 23:05
2
This post received
KUDOS
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

47% (01:29) correct 53% (00:25) wrong based on 441 sessions
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those
B. movies—fewer than have been
C. movies, which is less than those
D. movies, a number lower than the people
E. movies, fewer than the ones
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2012, 23:44
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those

Problem one - Less is normally used for uncountable things. People is countable. This kills C as well.
Even while using less than, verb forms should be parallel. Have been killed is not parallel to killed. Kills D and E

B. movies—fewer than have been
Perfect.
C. movies, which is less than those
Less than used again. Verb form not parallel.
D. movies, a number lower than the people
Lower is does not mean less. Lower is more closer to shorter/smaller.
E. movies, fewer than the ones
Verb form error.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 8

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2012, 23:52
ShalabhAr wrote:
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those

Problem one - Less is normally used for uncountable things. People is countable. This kills C as well.
Even while using less than, verb forms should be parallel. Have been killed is not parallel to killed. Kills D and E

B. movies—fewer than have been
Perfect.
C. movies, which is less than those
Less than used again. Verb form not parallel.
D. movies, a number lower than the people
Lower is does not mean less. Lower is more closer to shorter/smaller.
E. movies, fewer than the ones
Verb form error.



in B should it not be fewer than those who have been killed by bee sting
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [1] , given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2012, 23:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
You are not looking for a perfect answer. Just the one that is not wrong. :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2012
Posts: 17
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 00:01
Even i have a doubt on this one :

Is "fewer than have been" correct ??
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [1] , given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 00:31
1
This post received
KUDOS
Its not wrong just because it doesn't 'sound' right. Use the grammar rules. Other four are definitely wrong.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 00:49
When should be use hyphen "-"? I think comma is needed after movies. Please exlpain.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 00:51
Hyphen can be used as a comma. If you are referring to the holy grail (read Manhattan SC), you would find it right there.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 8

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 01:08
ShalabhAr wrote:
Hyphen can be used as a comma. If you are referring to the holy grail (read Manhattan SC), you would find it right there.


Why is E wrong ? what verb form error ??

Hyphen can be used as anything! colon, semi colon, comma etc.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 01:16
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
have been killed vs killed. Not parallel.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2012
Posts: 17
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 07:04
ShalabhAr wrote:
Its not wrong just because it doesn't 'sound' right. Use the grammar rules. Other four are definitely wrong.


so you mean to say that the phrase "fewer than have been" is grammatically correct ??
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 07:54
Well, what's wrong with it? Verb form parallel, fewer usage apt. The only problem you have in it is a missing pronoun. Right? Its more concise than you prefer I guess but still is correct.

Posted from my mobile device Image
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2012
Posts: 37
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 16:37
I was thinking the coma signal whatever after it is a modifying phrase. "movies" was before the coma so it's modifying phrase was modifying movies, which is incorrect.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 141
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 97

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2012, 21:37
im still vvondering vvhat is the right reasoning to this

B seems vvierd
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2012
Posts: 67
Schools: Tepper '15 (WL)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 7

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 09:28
I don't agree with B for the same aforementioned reasons. Regardless if it "sounds" incorrect, you are saying that the number is fewer than...what?
Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 267

Kudos [?]: 1701 [4] , given: 249

Premium Member
Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 09:51
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In this case, B is the choice purely because of //ism between have been killed by the great white shark and fewer than have been killed by bee stings. Hence, those killed in A and C or the people killed in D and the ones killed in E are not structurally parallel to have been killed. In B, which really means fewer than those who have been killed, the phrase -those who - remains elliptic and understood.

Let us not confuse that some numbers are being compared here. People, the victims of GWS are being compared with people, the victims of the bee sting. E is additionally wrong in denigrating people as fewer than the ones; it should say fewer than who or those.

_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 151
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 17

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink] New post 26 Nov 2012, 20:37
I don't understand why "less' can't be used with people.

I don't consider people a count noun.

We don't say "peoples"

My definition of a "count noun" is a noun that can be plural by adding an S. Like Bottle. There are 5 water bottles here. Am I wrong?

For example, wine is non-count. How much less wine do you want?

I guess we do say, there are "5 people" here... but no S at the end.


Can someone chime in ?
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2012
Posts: 73
Schools: Jones '15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [1] , given: 5

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2012, 06:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those people are countable, less is used for non-countable things - INCORRECT!!
B. movies—fewer than have been CORRECT!!!
C. movies, which is less than thoseless should not be used for countable things - INCORRECT!!
D. movies, a number lower than the peoplenumber should not be compared with people - INCORRECT!!
E. movies, fewer than the onescomma makes this modifier, fewer than the pones seems to modify movies - INCORRECT!!

IMO, answer is B
2 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 648
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 368 [2] , given: 23

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2012, 20:34
2
This post received
KUDOS
anon1 wrote:
I don't understand why "less' can't be used with people.

I don't consider people a count noun.

We don't say "peoples"

My definition of a "count noun" is a noun that can be plural by adding an S. Like Bottle. There are 5 water bottles here. Am I wrong?

For example, wine is non-count. How much less wine do you want?

I guess we do say, there are "5 people" here... but no S at the end.

Can someone chime in ?

So going by this logic, would you consider 'fish' as countable or uncountable? you can surely count fish but cant add S at the end (or if you do, it would be a blunder :-D )
I think MGMAT's strategy with this is best: just see if counting 1 , 2, 3 etc makes sense with it. eg. 1 bottle , 2 bottles, 3 bottles etc. or 1 fish, 2 fish, 3 fish.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!! ;-)
Black Friday Debrief

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 151
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 17

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2012, 20:38
Vips0000 wrote:
So going by this logic, would you consider 'fish' as countable or uncountable? you can surely count fish but cant add S at the end (or if you do, it would be a blunder :-D )
I think MGMAT's strategy with this is best: just see if counting 1 , 2, 3 etc makes sense with it. eg. 1 bottle , 2 bottles, 3 bottles etc. or 1 fish, 2 fish, 3 fish.


Ah yes, that's a good way of thinking about it. You are the man Vips.
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great   [#permalink] 28 Nov 2012, 20:38
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great apollo168 12 04 Sep 2006, 22:11
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great joemama142000 2 17 Apr 2006, 01:41
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great perezhan 2 07 May 2005, 22:49
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great perezhan 7 22 Mar 2005, 13:23
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great NEWKID 1 10 Nov 2004, 20:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 27 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.